Decker & Decker

Case [2022] FedCFamC1F 563


Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia

(DIVISION 1)

Decker & Decker [2022] FedCFamC1F 563

File number(s): SYC6644/2021
Judgment of: WILSON J
Date of judgment: 11 August 2022
Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – MAJOR COMPLEX FINANCIAL PROCEEDINGS LIST – wife seeking orders under s 79A to set aside consent orders – husband seeking orders for the summary dismissal of the wife’s s 79A application – husband’s summary dismissal application dismissed.
Legislation:

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 131(1) and 131(2)(g)

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 45A, s 79 and s 79A

Cases cited:

Bacall & Zagar [2020] FamCA 350

Beck v Beck (2004) 31 Fam LR 467

Bigg v Suzi (1998) 22 Fam LR 700

Dalton & Nagle [2021] FamCA 376

Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawcher (2011) 243 CLR 588

Eaby v Speelman [2015] FamCAFC 104

Ebner v Pappas (2014) 53 Fam LR 397

Gong & Zao [2021] FamCAFC 110

Hadwich v Scaddon (2020) 61 Fam LR 202

Harford & Spalding [2021] FamCA 636

Harris v Caladine (1991) 172 CLR 84

Herbert & Herbert (No 3) [2020] FamCA 603

Herbert & Herbert [2021] FamCAFC 108

Honeysett v R (2014) 253 CLR 122

Hsiao v Fazari (2020) 270 CLR 588

In the Marriage of Gebert (1990) 14 Fam LR 62

In the Matter of Patching (1995) 18 Fam LR 675

Jaynes & Rundle [2020] FamCAFC 292

Jess & Jess (No 4) [2022] FedCFamC1F 530

Lindon v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) (1996) 70 ALJR 541

Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705

Marvel v Marvel (2010) 43 Fam LR 348

Min & Orton [2021] FamCA502

Mohsen & Collings (No 2) [2021] FamCA 170

Munnings v Australian Government Solicitor (1994) 68 ALJR 169

Pelerman v Pelerman (2000) 26 Fam LR 505

Redmond v Redmond [2014] FamCAFC 155

Ritter and Ritter [2020] FamCAFC 86

SS & AH [2010] FamCAFC 13

Statvia & Statvia [2015] FamCAFC 170

The Juliana (1822) 165 ER 1560

Thorne v Kennedy ( 2017) 263 CLR 104

Webster v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598

Division: Division 1 First Instance
Number of paragraphs: 66
Date of hearing: 12 July 2022
Place: Melbourne
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr G. Dickson QC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Barkus Doolan Winning
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr J. Lloyd QC
Solicitor for the Respondent: Uther Webster & Evans

ORDERS

SYC 6644 of 2021

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)

BETWEEN:

MR DECKER

Applicant

AND:

MS DECKER

Respondent

order made by:

WILSON J

DATE OF ORDER:

11 AUGUST 2022

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The husband’s summary dismissal application of the wife’s s 79A application is dismissed.

2.On or before 4:00pm on 25 August 2022 any application for costs must be filed and served with supporting evidence.

3.On or before 4:00pm on 8 September 2022 any affidavit material in opposition to the material filed pursuant to paragraph 2 hereof must be filed and served.

4.On or before 4:00pm on 22 September 2022 the parties must file and serve written submissions on costs.

5.The…

Continue reading Decker & Decker

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Decker & Decker [2022] FedCFamC1F 563
Case
[2022] FedCFamC1F 563
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In Decker & Decker, the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia dismissed the husband's application for summary dismissal of the wife's application to set aside consent orders under s 79A of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). The husband's application was grounded in s 45A of the Family Law Act, which permits the court to make a decree for one party if the other party has no reasonable prospect of successfully defending the proceedings. The wife contended that the husband's failure to disclose key documents in the lead up to the settlement of the property settlement proceeding on 21 November 2019 amounted to a miscarriage of justice. The court found that there were significant factual disputes that must be determined at trial and that the wife's application for relief under s 79A(1)(a) was wholly arguable. The court took the view that the wife's application was arguable and that it would be antithetical to the interests of justice for her case to be summarily terminated. The court dismissed the husband's summary dismissal application and directed that any application for costs must be filed and served with supporting evidence by 4:00pm on 25 August 2022. Any affidavit material in opposition must be filed and served by 4:00pm on 8 September 2022. Written submissions are to be filed and served by 4:00pm on 22 September 2022. The question of costs will be decided on the papers thereafter.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.