| [2016] FWCA 1982 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Decipha Pty Ltd
(AG2016/2344)
DECIPHA ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Graphic Arts | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 31 MARCH 2016 |
Application for approval of the Decipha Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Decipha Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Decipha Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 April 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 22 October 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE418405 PR578503>
ANNEXURE A
- AGLC
- Decipha Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 1982
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 1982
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the FWC involved the legitimacy of the bargaining process that led to the agreement and whether the agreement itself satisfied the statutory requirements for approval. Key points of contention included whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated and whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees. The FWC had to determine if the bargaining process was free from coercion and if the agreement met the "better off overall test," ensuring employees were not worse off under the new agreement.
In rendering its decision, the FWC examined the evidence presented regarding the bargaining process and the terms of the agreement. The Commission found that the bargaining process was genuine and that the agreement was negotiated in good faith. The FWC also concluded that the agreement met the better off overall test and was fair and reasonable for the employees. Consequently, the FWC approved the Decipha Enterprise Agreement 2015, confirming its compliance with the statutory requirements.
The final orders of the FWC approved the Decipha Enterprise Agreement 2015, ensuring that it would come into effect as of the date specified in the agreement. The decision underscored the importance of a genuine bargaining process and the necessity for agreements to meet the statutory criteria for approval.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.