Dean's Mac's Hotel Pty Ltd t/as Mac's Hotel

Case [2014] FWCA 8892


[2014] FWCA 8892
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s 185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Dean's Mac's Hotel Pty Ltd t/as Mac's Hotel
(AG2014/10078)

MAC'S HOTEL/UNITED VOICE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014-2018

Hospitality industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS

SYDNEY, 9 DECEMBER 2014

Application for approval of the Mac's Hotel/United Voice Enterprise Agreement 2014-2018.

[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’), filed by Dean’s Mac’s Hotel Pty Ltd t/as Mac’s Hotel (the ‘applicant’) which seeks the approval of the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the Mac’s Hotel/United Voice Enterprise Agreement 2014-2018 (the ‘Agreement’). The Agreement was negotiated with United Voice (South Australian Branch) (the ‘Union’) and is to cover 34 employees who are employed at the applicant’s hotel in Mount Gambier, South Australia.

[2] The employees were last notified of their representational rights on 15 October and voting for the Agreement’s approval took place between 23 and 25 November 2014. The time limits under s 181(2) of the Act are thereby satisfied. In a ballot, 22 of the 24 employees who cast a valid vote, agreed to approve the Agreement. The application for approval of the Agreement was lodged on 28 November 2014, thereby satisfying s 185(3) of the Act.

[3] In the Employer’s Declaration in support of the application (Form F17) Mr P Johnson identified the Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2010 [MA000009], the Hotels, Clubs, Etc., Award [AN150066] and the Clerks’ (Clubs, Hotels and Motels) Award 1979 [160075] as the relevant reference instruments for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test (the ‘BOOT’). Mr Johnsonsaid that the Agreement does contain some terms that are less beneficial than those under the reference instruments, including reduced penalty rates for casual employees for work performed on Sundays and public holidays. However, the Agreement provides for a number of terms and conditions that are more beneficial than those under the reference instruments, including higher rates of pay, increased casual loading and more generous penalty rates for permanent employees for work performed on Saturdays and Sundays. I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the BOOT. The Agreement provides for the mandatory flexibility and consultation terms at clauses 15 and 16 respectively, and a disputes resolution procedure at clause 17 provides for conciliation and arbitration by the Commission.

[4] At a hearing of the application on 8 December 2014, Mr O Webb and Mr T Evans of the Australian Hotels Associationappeared with Ms J Kember for the applicant. The Union did not appear, but had filed a Declaration in relation to the application (Form 18) supporting the approval of the Agreement and giving notice that it wishes to be covered by the Agreement (s 183). For the purposes of s 201(2) of the Act, I note that the Union is to be covered by the Agreement. Mr Webb outlined the main features of the Agreement and submitted that all of the legislative requirements for approval of the Agreement have been satisfied. The Agreement should therefore be approved by the Commission. He explained that rates of pay are to be increased by 3.5% on 1 July 2015, 1 July 2016 and 1 July 2017.

[5] Having heard the applicant’s submissions and upon reviewing the terms of the preapproval process documentation and the Agreement itself, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular ss 180, 186, 187 and 188, in so far as relevant to this application, have been met. Accordingly, I approve a single enterprise agreement known as the Mac’s Hotel/United Voice Enterprise Agreement 2014-2018.Pursuant to s 54 of the Act, the Agreement shall operate from 15 December 2014 and have a nominal expiry date of 30 June 2018.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE411671  PR558785>

Details
AGLC
Dean's Mac's Hotel Pty Ltd t/as Mac's Hotel [2014] FWCA 8892
Case
[2014] FWCA 8892
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, Dean's Mac's Hotel Pty Ltd, trading as Mac's Hotel, applied for the approval of the Mac's Hotel/United Voice Enterprise Agreement 2014-2018. United Voice, a union representing employees, was also a party to the application. The dispute centred on whether the terms of the enterprise agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it met the requirements for approval under the Act. The Commission was tasked with examining the agreement's provisions, particularly those concerning minimum wage rates, leave entitlements, and procedural fairness in the workplace.

The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the enterprise agreement's provisions met the statutory requirements for approval and if they ensured fairness and compliance with the Fair Work Act. The Commission needed to determine if the agreement provided for minimum terms and conditions, including wages and leave entitlements, and whether it allowed for procedural fairness in the workplace. Additionally, the Commission considered whether the agreement was made in good faith and if it met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act.

The Commission found that the Mac's Hotel/United Voice Enterprise Agreement 2014-2018 met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. The agreement provided for minimum terms and conditions, including wages and leave entitlements, which aligned with the minimum standards set out in the National Employment Standards. The Commission also noted that the agreement contained provisions for procedural fairness in the workplace, ensuring that employees had a voice in workplace decisions. Furthermore, the Commission was satisfied that the agreement was made in good faith and met the requirements for approval under the Act.

Consequently, the Fair Work Commission approved the Mac's Hotel/United Voice Enterprise Agreement 2014-2018. The approval was made under the Fair Work Act, ensuring that the agreement would now serve as a binding contract between the employer and the employees represented by United Voice. This decision provided clarity and certainty for both parties regarding the terms and conditions of employment moving forward.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.