DD v Ilievski

The appellant, DD, appealed against her conviction and sentence in the Magistrates Court for stalking offences against the respondent, Ilievski. The appeal was heard by the Supreme Court, where the primary issue was whether the sentence imposed by the Magistrates Court was manifestly excessive.

The appeal raised questions about the appropriate sentence for stalking offences and the process for determining whether a sentence is manifestly excessive. The appellant argued that the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive and disproportionate to the seriousness of the offence. The respondent, on the other hand, contended that the sentence was within the appropriate range for the offence.

The court found that the sentence was indeed manifestly excessive and disproportionate to the seriousness of the offence. The court considered the nature of the offence, the appellant's criminal history, and the need to deter future offending. The court also noted that the appellant had shown remorse and had cooperated with authorities. The appeal was allowed in part, and the appellant was re-sentenced to 20 months' imprisonment.