DAVIS
v
TERRY RYAN (STATE CORONER)
[2020] HCASL 60
B75/2019
This is an application for special leave to appeal from part of a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland. The proposed appeal would enjoy insufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. The application should be dismissed.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
P.A. Keane J.J. Edelman 18 March 2020
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Davis v Terry Ryan (State Coroner) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2020] HCASL 60
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue for the Court was whether the appeal had sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave. The Court needed to assess whether the arguments presented in the appeal had merit and could potentially lead to a different outcome in the Court of Appeal. This involved a thorough review of the legal principles and authorities relevant to the case, as well as an examination of the evidence and arguments presented.
The Court found that the appeal did not have sufficient prospects of success to justify the grant of special leave. The arguments put forward by the applicant were considered to be lacking in merit and unlikely to lead to a different outcome in the Court of Appeal. The Court was satisfied that the decision of the Court of Appeal was sound and that there was no basis for the grant of special leave. As a result, the application for special leave to appeal was dismissed.
Pursuant to the High Court Rules, the Registrar was directed to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application. This decision was made on 18 March 2020 by Keane and Edelman JJ. The order effectively brought the applicant's appeal to an end, confirming that there were no grounds for further appeal to the High Court.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.