DAVIES & Anor v Lazer Safe Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

DAVIES & ANOR

v

LAZER SAFE PTY LTD

[2019] HCASL 302
P25/2019

  1. The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from a decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia (Greenwood, White and Burley JJ).  The application raises no issue of principle sufficient to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. Accordingly, special leave to appeal should be refused.    

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.

S.J. Gageler
11 September 2019
P.A. Keane
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read DAVIES & Anor v Lazer Safe Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] HCASL 302
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Davies & Anor v Lazer Safe Pty Ltd, the applicants sought special leave to appeal a decision rendered by the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia. The case involved a dispute that pertained to the interpretation and application of certain statutory provisions, and the extent of the liability of the respondent company. The applicants, Davies and another party, were challenging the Full Court's ruling which upheld a lower court decision.

The legal issues before the court primarily revolved around the interpretation of specific statutory provisions and the extent of liability of Lazer Safe Pty Ltd. The applicants argued that the Full Court had erred in their interpretation of the relevant laws and in the assessment of the company's liability. The applicants sought to overturn the Full Court's decision, which had found in favour of the respondent company.

In its decision, the court found that the application did not raise any issue of principle that would warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. The court considered that the Full Court's interpretation and application of the statutory provisions were correct, and that the assessment of the respondent company's liability was also appropriate. The court therefore dismissed the application for special leave to appeal, and directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.