Savcor Pty Ltd v Cathodic Protection International APS
[2005] VSCA 213
Citation 1
…exercised for good reason”.[1] [1] Ramsay v Madgwicks (a firm) [1989] VR 1 at page 6; See also Savcor v Cathodic Protection International APS (2005) 12 VR 639 at 651 18 An application under Rule 5.12 is not a “pleading summons” and any perusal of the Statement of Claim by the Court is to ascertain the substance of…
Tyson v Morgan
[1998] QSC 90
Citation 2
…ars and nine months had expired between the time the cause of action allegedly rose and the date the application was made to renew the Writ. [18] [1998] QSC 90 31 The judge described the lack of activity on behalf of those acting on behalf of the plaintiff and ultimately found he was not satisfied that reasonabl…
Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor
[1996] HCA 25
Citation 3
…icular, the judgment of McHugh J, wherein he reinforced the importance of limitation periods, particularly in relation to limitation of actions. [13] (1996) 186 CLR 541 28 In Irving v Carbines ,[14] the Full Court also stated: “If the failure of the plaintiff's original solicitor to serve the summons within a year af…
Van Leer Australia Pty Ltd v Palace Shipping KK
[1981] HCA 11
Citation 4
…ings against Simsmetal, the alleged charterer of the ship, and the defendant, which was alleged to be the Japanese owner of the ship. [3] (1981) 180 CLR 337 20 The plaintiff issued the writ in November 1978, nearly a year after the arrival of the steel. The writ was served on Simsmetal in September 1979 but notice of…