Davidson and Cox

Case [2015] FCCA 1908


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

DAVIDSON & COX [2015] FCCA 1908
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Contravention – whether reasonable excuse.

Legislation:  

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), ss.60B, 65N, 70NAC, 70NAD, 70NAE, 70NAF

Childers & Leslie [2008] FamCAFC 5
In the Marriage of Gaunt (1978) FLC 90-468
O’Brien & O’Brien (1993) FLC 92-396
Stevenson & Hughes (1993) FLC 92-363
Stavros & Stavros (1984) FLC 91-562
Davidson & Cox [2014] FCCA 3147
Applicant: MR DAVIDSON
Respondent: MS COX
File Number: HBC 95 of 2013
Judgment of: Judge Baker
Hearing dates: 3 June 2015 & 12 June 2015
Date of Last Submission: 12 June 2015
Delivered at: Hobart
Delivered on: 16 June 2015

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Ms Ryan
Solicitors for the Applicant: PWB Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Munro
Solicitors for the Respondent: John Munro & Associates
Counsel for the Independent Children’s Lawyer: Mr Fitzgerald
Solicitors for the Independent Children’s Lawyer: Fitzgerald & Browne

THE COURT FINDS THAT:

  1. The Mother without reasonable excuse contravened Order 2(b) of the Orders made on 21 November 2014 and amended on 11 December 2014 on the following occasions:

    (a)9 January 2015 at 3:00 pm;

    (b)16 January 2015 at 3:00 pm;

    (c)23 January 2015 at 3:00 pm;

    (d)30 January 2015 at 3:00 pm;

  2. The Mother without reasonable excuse contravened Order 4(h) of the Orders made on 18 December 2013 on the following occasions:

    (a)8 January 2015 at 6:30 pm – 7:30 pm;

    (b)13 January 2015 at 6:30 pm – 7:30 pm;

    (c)15 January 2015 at 6:30 pm – 7:30 pm;

    (d)20 January 2015 at 6:30 pm – 7:30 pm;

    (e)22 January 2015 at 6:30 pm – 7:30 pm;

    (f)27 January 2015 at 6:30 pm – 7:30 pm;

    (g)29 January 2015 at 6:30 pm – 7:30 pm.

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

  1. This matter be adjourned to 15 July 2015 at 10:00 for hearing of the Application in a Case filed by the Mother on 8 April 2015.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Davidson & Cox is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA

AT HOBART

HBC 95 of 2013

MR DAVIDSON

Applicant

And

MS COX

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Revised from Transcript

  1. This is a contravention application of the father of the child X, born (omitted) 2007. 

  2. There are eleven allegations.  The respondent mother admitted that she has contravened the orders made on 21 November 2014 and amended on 11 December 2014, but asserted that she has a reasonable excuse in respect of each allegation.

Evidence

  1. The applicant father relied on the following documents: 

    ·   His affidavit filed 2 March 2015;

    ·   affidavits of Ms J filed 5 November 2014 and 2 March 2015;

    ·   affidavit of Andrew John Munro filed 18 November 2014;

    ·   Memorandum of Family Consultant dated 17 November 2014;

    ·   Reasons for Judgment dated 21 November 2014;

    ·   written submissions;

    ·   subpoenaed documents in list of exhibits.

  2. The respondent mother relied on:

    ·   her affidavit filed…

Continue reading Davidson and Cox

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Davidson and Cox [2015] FCCA 1908
Case
[2015] FCCA 1908
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Davidson and Cox, heard before Judge Baker, the dispute concerned an application filed by the Mother on 8 April 2015.

The court was required to determine the date for the hearing of the Mother's application.

Judge Baker ordered that the matter be adjourned to 15 July 2015 at 10:00 for the hearing of the application.

Orders

Orders of the court

3.

This matter be adjourned to 15 July 2015 at 10:00 for hearing of the Application in a Case filed by the Mother on 8 April 2015.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.