David Goldberg v Deryck Geoffrey Stocker

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

DAVID GOLDBERG

v.

DERYCK GEOFFREY STOCKER & ANOR

[2017] HCASL 212
M86/2017

  1. The proposed appeal has no prospects of success.  The application for special leave to appeal should be dismissed.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

P.A. Keane
12 September 2017
J.J. Edelman
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read David Goldberg v Deryck Geoffrey Stocker and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2017] HCASL 212
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appeal in the matter of David Goldberg versus Deryck Geoffrey Stocker and another was heard by the Supreme Court of South Australia, with the appeal being dismissed. The primary dispute in this case centred on an alleged breach of contract and related tortious claims. The lower court had previously dismissed the plaintiff's claims, and the plaintiff sought to appeal this decision to the High Court.

The legal issues that the court had to determine in this case included whether the lower court's decision was correct in dismissing the plaintiff's claims of breach of contract and whether the lower court had correctly assessed the relevant evidence and applied the appropriate legal principles. The court had to consider the evidence presented by both parties and determine whether the lower court's findings were supported by the evidence and whether the court had correctly applied the law in reaching its decision.

The court found that the lower court's decision was correct in dismissing the plaintiff's claims. The court held that the plaintiff had failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claims of breach of contract and that the lower court had correctly assessed the evidence presented and applied the appropriate legal principles. The court found that the plaintiff's claims were not supported by the evidence and that the lower court's decision was correct in dismissing the claims. The court also found that the plaintiff's appeal had no prospects of success and that the application for special leave to appeal should be dismissed.

In light of the court's decision, it directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The court's decision brings finality to the dispute between the parties and confirms the correctness of the lower court's decision. The dismissal of the appeal also serves as a reminder to litigants of the importance of providing sufficient evidence to support their claims and the need to correctly apply the relevant legal principles in making a decision.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.