Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: Davi Developments Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Council [2007] NSWLEC 106 PARTIES: APPLICANT
RESPONDENT
Davi Developments Pty Ltd
Leichhart CouncilFILE NUMBER(S): 10620 of 2006 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- Modification application - Whether substantial comencement - whether work relied upon lawful - whether substantially the same development. LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 96
Local Government Act 1919CASES CITED: Coalcliff Community Association Inc v Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning and Others (1999) 106 LGERA 243;
Day v Pinglen Pty Ltd (1981) 148 CLR 289;
Drummoyne Municipal Council v Page (1973) NSWLR 566;
Drummoyne Municipal Council v Lebnan (1974) 131 CLR 350;
Elizabeth Securities Pty Limited, Joseph Michael Malouf and Phozzie Anthony Malouf and as Executors of the will of Naaman George Malouf deceased (NSWLEC, 25/05/1982, unreported, Cripps J);
Irongates Developments Pty Ltd v Richmond–Evans Environmental Society Inc (1992) 81 LGERA 132;
Minister for Natural Resources v NSW Aboriginal Land Council (1987) 9 NSWLR 154 ;
Moto Projects (No. 2) Pty Limited v North Sydney Council (1999) 106 LGERA 298;
North Sydney Council v Michael Standley and Associates Pty Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 468DATES OF HEARING: 26/02/2007
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
5 March 2007LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: APPLICANT
N Hemmings QC
SOLICITORS
Allens Arthur RobinsonRESPONDENT
S Duggan (Barrister)
SOLICITORS
Pike Pike & Fenwick
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALESTalbot J
5 March 2007
JUDGMENT10620 of 2006 Davi Developments Pty Ltd v Leichardt Muncipal Council
1 Talbot J: On 22 December 2005, the applicant company made an application to modify development consent No. 3736 granted by the respondent council on 24 December 1970. The application to modify the consent has not been determined. The company has appealed to this Court on the basis of a deemed refusal of its application. In general terms the application for modification seeks an approval for the reduction of one floor, deletion of the lift overrun and the reconfiguration of the units with a rearrangement of the car park plan in respect of the existing proposal for a seven storey residential flat building with two levels for parking under.
2 The approval issued by the council on 24 December 1970 permitted demolition of two existing cottages on the subject land and erecting thereon the seven storey residential flat building with two levels for parking under in accordance with the particulars set out in an application to carry out development under the town planning provisions of the Local Government Act 1919 lodged with the council 27 January 1970 “as amended by letter dated 7 December 1970”.
3 A building application was subsequently lodged with the council on 23 December 1971. This application was considered by the council at its meeting on 21 March 1972 when consideration was deferred for 14 days to permit an inspection by the Works Committee of Council. At its meeting on 4 April 1972, the council resolved to adopt…
Continue reading Davi Developments Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Council
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Davi Developments Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Council [2007] NSWLEC 106
- Case
- [2007] NSWLEC 106
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the proposed modifications were consistent with the approved development consent and whether the modifications complied with the relevant planning and environmental laws. The court had to consider the relevant statutory provisions, the terms of the original development consent, and the principles of planning and environmental law. The court was also required to determine whether the proposed modifications would have a significant impact on the environment and the character of the surrounding area.
After considering the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, the court found that the proposed modifications did not comply with the approved development consent and the relevant planning and environmental laws. The court held that the modifications would result in a significant increase in the height of the building, which was not permitted under the approved development consent. The court also found that the modifications would have a significant impact on the environment and the character of the surrounding area. Accordingly, the court dismissed the application and refused the requested modification of the development consent. The court reserved the costs of the determination of the preliminary issues and allowed the exhibits to be returned.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The application is dismissed; 2. The application for modification of development consent No. 3736 is determined by refusal of consent; 3. The costs of determination of the preliminary issues are reserved; 4. The exhibits may be returned.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.