Davey v Herbst and Bray
Case
•
[2011] ACTCA 27
•December 23, 2011
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Davey v Herbst and Bray [2011] ACTCA 27
[2011] ACTCA 27
December 23, 2011
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicants, Davey and Bray, sought a stay of enforcement of judgments and costs orders made in ACT Magistrates Court proceedings and ACT Supreme Court proceedings. The application was heard by the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the applicants had established sufficient grounds to warrant a stay of enforcement of the existing judgments and costs orders. This involved considering the principles governing the grant of such stays, particularly in circumstances where an appeal is pending or contemplated.
The Court's reasoning focused on the established legal principles for granting a stay of execution, which typically require demonstrating a strong likelihood of success on appeal and that the applicant would suffer irreparable harm if the stay were not granted. The Court found that the applicants had not satisfied these stringent requirements. Consequently, the application for a stay of enforcement was refused.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the applicants had established sufficient grounds to warrant a stay of enforcement of the existing judgments and costs orders. This involved considering the principles governing the grant of such stays, particularly in circumstances where an appeal is pending or contemplated.
The Court's reasoning focused on the established legal principles for granting a stay of execution, which typically require demonstrating a strong likelihood of success on appeal and that the applicant would suffer irreparable harm if the stay were not granted. The Court found that the applicants had not satisfied these stringent requirements. Consequently, the application for a stay of enforcement was refused.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Stay of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Davey v Herbst and Bray [2011] ACTCA 27
Most Recent Citation
Threlfall v TBS Building Services and Ors and VWA v City of Port Phillip and Ors (Ruling) [2012] VCC 981
Cases Citing This Decision
78
Beljajev v Director of Public Prosecutions
[1991] HCA 16
Ebert v Union Trustee Co of Australia Ltd
[1961] HCA 29
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
4
Kalifair Pty Ltd v Digi-Tech (Australia) Ltd
[2002] NSWCA 383
Benjamin v GB Franchising Australia Pty Ltd
[2008] ACTCA 11
Benjamin v GB Franchising Australia Pty Ltd
[2008] ACTCA 11