Darrell Olofia v Vjk Labour Solutions Pty Ltd
[2023] FWC 2959
•10 NOVEMBER 2023
| [2023] FWC 2959 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.365—General protections
Darrell Olofia
v
Vjk Labour Solutions Pty Ltd
(C2023/4585)
| VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI | SYDNEY, 10 NOVEMBER 2023 |
Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal – application dismissed.
On 1 August 2023, Mr Darrell Olofia (the applicant) made an application under s.365 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The application was filed by Mr Olofia’s Representative. The applicant alleges that he was dismissed in contravention of the general protection provisions in Part 3-1 of the Act.
The application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) (regulations) or by a completed application for waiver of the lodgement fee (waiver application). The applicant has not responded to correspondence from the Commission alerting him to this deficiency, nor has the deficiency been rectified. I have decided to dismiss the application for the following reasons.
Context
On 3 August 2023, the Commission emailed correspondence to Mr Olofia’s nominated email address advising that his application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if he wished to proceed with the application. The email further stated as follows:
“Please pay the application fee within 7 calendar days (or apply to have the fee waived) so we can progress your case.
If you don’t make payment within 7 days your application may be dismissed.”
On 7 August 2023, the Commission emailed correspondence to Mr Olofia’s nominated email address reminding that his application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if he wished to proceed with the application. The correspondence instructed the applicant on how to pay the application fee or make a waiver application and further stated as follows:
“Reminder: You need to pay the application fee (or apply to have the fee waived) or your application may be dismissed.”.
On 11 August 2023, the Commission attempted to contact Mr Olofia on his nominated telephone number. However, the call was not answered. A voicemail message was left advising Mr Olofia that payment of the required fee was still outstanding. The voicemail further advised if no payment was received within three days, his matter may be dismissed.
On 21 August 2023 an attempt was made to contact the Representative of Mr Olofia to obtain payment or a completed waiver form. The call was not answered. A voicemail message was left advising the filing fee for Mr Olofia’s matter is still outstanding.
On 1 September 2023, the Commission made a final attempt to contact Mr Olofia and his Representative via email correspondence. The correspondence warned if no payment was received, the matter may be dismissed without further notice.
To date, the applicant has not paid the lodgement fee or filed a completed waiver application.
Legislative framework
In relation to an application made pursuant to s.365 of the Act, s.367(1) provides that the application “must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.” At the time the application was made, the regulations prescribed a fee of $83.30. The regulations also allow for an application to be made for the fee to be waived.
Section 587 of the Act provides as follows:
587 Dismissing applications
(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:
(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.
…
(2) Despite paragraphs (1) (b) and (c), the FWC must not dismiss an application under section 365 or 773, or an application under section 527F that does not consist solely of an application for a stop sexual harassment order, on the ground that the application:
(a) is frivolous or vexatious; or
(b) has no reasonable prospects of success.
(3) The FWC may dismiss an application:
(a) on its own initiative; or
(b) on application.
Consideration and conclusion
The applicant has neither paid the lodgement fee nor sought a fee waiver. Accordingly, the application is not made in accordance with s.367 of the Act.
The applicant has taken no action to address the deficiency despite being notified of it by the Commission on multiple occasions. In these circumstances, I have decided to exercise my discretion to dismiss the application in accordance with s.587(1)(a) of the Act.
The application is dismissed.
VICE PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR768188>
0
0
0