Darley v Darley

DARLEY
v
DARLEY & ANOR
[2021] HCASL 171
B38/2021

An extension of time is necessary to enable this application for special leave to appeal to proceed. The application does not show any reason to doubt that the decision of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia was correct. To the extent that the applicant seeks to adduce "fresh evidence" before this Court, it is settled that this Court cannot receive fresh evidence upon appeal. The foreshadowed appeal has no prospect of success. Consequently, the application for special leave should be refused. That being so, it would be futile to grant an extension of time.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

P.A. Keane J.J. Edelman

9 September 2021

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The High Court of Australia was presented with an application for special leave to appeal from a decision of the Family Court of Australia. The applicants, Darley, sought to appeal a decision of the Full Court regarding a family law matter. The dispute involved issues pertinent to family law, such as parenting arrangements and possibly financial orders, but the specifics of the case were not detailed in the summary provided. The Full Court had already rendered its decision, and the applicants sought to challenge that decision on appeal to the High Court.

The legal issues before the High Court centred on whether the applicants had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant an extension of time to proceed with their appeal and whether the appeal itself had any prospects of success. The court had to consider the criteria for granting special leave to appeal, including the importance of the legal issues, the potential impact on the law, and whether the appeal had any reasonable prospect of success. The court also had to address whether the applicants could present any new evidence that had not been considered in the original proceedings.

The High Court found that the applicants had not provided any compelling reasons to extend the time limit for the appeal or to grant special leave to appeal. The court was of the view that the decision of the Full Court was correct and that the appeal had no reasonable prospects of success. Moreover, the High Court reiterated that it could not entertain new evidence on appeal, and the applicants had not shown how the proposed new evidence would change the outcome of the case. Consequently, the application for special leave to appeal was dismissed.

The High Court, therefore, dismissed the application for special leave to appeal and ordered that the Registrar draw up, sign, and seal an order to that effect. The order, made pursuant to rule 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), was signed by Justice Keane and Justice Edelman on 9 September 2021. This decision underscores the stringent criteria the High Court applies when considering applications for special leave to appeal, particularly in family law matters.

Keep reading for free

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established