Darley v Darley

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

DARLEY

v

DARLEY & ANOR

[2021] HCASL 172
B39/2021

  1. An extension of time is required to enable this application for special leave to appeal to proceed. The appeal foreshadowed by the application raises no question of principle of general importance and, in any event, enjoys insufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. The application should be refused. Consequently, it would be futile to grant the extension of time required to enable the application to proceed.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

P.A. Keane J.J. Edelman
9 September 2021
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Darley v Darley and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2021] HCASL 172
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The High Court was asked to consider an application for an extension of time in the case of Darley v Darley, an appeal against a decision from the Supreme Court of South Australia. The dispute involves a family law matter, specifically a property settlement between the parties, Darley and Darley. The applicant sought an extension of time to enable the application for special leave to appeal to proceed.

The legal issues before the court included whether the application for an extension of time should be granted and if the appeal itself had sufficient prospects of success and raised questions of principle of general importance. The court was required to assess the merits of the case and the potential impact of the appeal on broader legal principles.

In its reasoning, the court found that the appeal did not raise any questions of principle of general importance and had insufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. The court concluded that the application for an extension of time should be refused as it would be futile to grant the extension. The court emphasised that the appeal did not meet the criteria for special leave to appeal under the High Court Rules.

Consequently, the court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application for special leave to appeal. The decision was made by Keane and Edelman, Justices of the High Court, on 9 September 2021. The court's decision ensures that the appeal does not proceed without merit, preserving the integrity of the legal system.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.