| [2017] FWCA 827 [Note: a correction has been issued to this document] |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Dapto Leagues Club Ltd t/a Dapto Leagues Club
(AG2017/107)
DAPTO LEAGUES CLUB MANAGERS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT
Licensed and registered clubs | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS | SYDNEY, 8 FEBRUARY 2017 |
Application for approval of the Dapto Leagues Club Managers Enterprise Agreement.
[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’), filed by Dapto Leagues Club Ltd (the ‘applicant’) which seeks the approval of the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the Dapto Leagues Club Managers Enterprise Agreement (the ‘Agreement’). The Agreement was negotiated with the Club Managers’ Association of Australia (the ‘Union’) and is to cover managers who are engaged in the applicant’s licensed club in Dapto, NSW (currently 11 employees). For the purposes of s 186(3) of the Act, I am satisfied that the group of employees to be covered by this Agreement has been fairly chosen.
[2] The employees were last notified of their representational rights on 30 November 2016, and voting for the Agreement’s approval took place on 5 January 2017. The time limits under s 181(2) of the Act are thereby satisfied. In a secret ballot, all 10 of the employees who cast a valid vote, agreed to approve the Agreement. The application for approval of the Agreement was lodged on 16 January 2017, thereby satisfying s 185(3) of the Act.
[3] In the Employer’s Declaration in support of the application (Form F17) Mr G Tozer, who was previously the applicant’s President, identified the Registered and Licensed Clubs Award 2010 [MA000058] and the Club Managers (State) Award 2006 [AN120138] as the relevant reference instruments for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test (the ‘BOOT’). Mr Tozer said the Agreement provides for a number of more beneficial terms and conditions, including significantly higher wage rates of between 10-41%, the ability to cash out annual leave and more beneficial notice periods. Wages are to be increased by 2.5% or the Commission’s Minimum Wage Decisions on 1 July 2017, 2018 and 2019. I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the BOOT. The Agreement provides for the mandatory flexibility and consultation terms at clauses 12 and 39 respectively, and a disputes resolution procedure at clause 36 provides for conciliation and arbitration by the Commission.
[4] At a hearing of the application on 1 February 2017, Ms L Pike, of ClubsNSW,appeared for the applicant and Mr P Cooper for the Union. Ms Pike outlined the main features of the Agreement and submitted that all of the legislative requirements for approval of the Agreement have been satisfied and the Agreement should be approved by the Commission. I drew Ms Pike’s attention to the consultation clause at 39, which does not trigger in circumstances where the applicant intends to change an employee’s regular hours of work or roster. I also drew to Ms Pike’s attention that, while the Agreement specified that employee superannuation payments would be paid to a default superannuation fund, (unless otherwise directed by the employee), the Agreement did not identify the default fund. Ms Pike offered to provide an undertaking to rectify these matters. This was received in Chambers on 3 February 2017. Pursuant to s 191(1) of the Act, the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of this undertaking is attached to the Agreement and marked as ‘Annexure A’. The Union had filed a Declaration in relation to the application (Form 18) supporting the approval of the Agreement and giving notice that it wishes to be covered by the Agreement (s 183). For the purposes of s 201(2) of the Act, I note that the Union is to be covered by the Agreement.
[5] Having heard the parties’ submissions and upon reviewing the terms of the preapproval process documentation and the Agreement itself, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular ss180, 186, 187, 190 and 191, in so far as relevant to this application, have been met. Accordingly, I approve a single enterprise agreement known as the Dapto Leagues Club Managers Enterprise Agreement. Pursuant to s 54 of the Act, the Agreement shall operate from 8 February 2017 and have a nominal expiry date of 8 February 2020.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE423296 PR590113>
- AGLC
- Dapto Leagues Club Ltd t/a Dapto Leagues Club [2017] FWCA 827
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 827
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the procedural and substantive requirements of the Fair Work Act. Procedurally, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement had been made in good faith and if the requisite majority of employees had been consulted. Substantively, the Commission had to assess if the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and if it met the "better off overall test" as required by the legislation. The respondents argued that the agreement failed on both procedural and substantive grounds, while the applicants contended that the agreement was valid and met all legal requirements.
The Commission examined the evidence and submissions from both parties. It found that the agreement had been made in good faith and that there was sufficient consultation with the employees. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for a range of terms and conditions that were fair and reasonable, and it met the better off overall test. The Commission concluded that the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act and approved the agreement. The Full Bench found that the agreement was fit for its purpose and would provide for the fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment for the managers at the club.
The final orders of the Commission were that the Dapto Leagues Club Managers Enterprise Agreement be approved in accordance with the Fair Work Act. The agreement was to be registered with the Fair Work Commission, and it would come into effect on the date of the Commission's decision. The respondents' application for the approval of the agreement was dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.