| [2020] FWC 1001 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal
Danny Vlahiotis
v
Baravi Enterprises T/A Metro Joinery
(U2020/680)
COMMISSIONER BISSETT | MELBOURNE, 25 FEBRUARY 2020 |
Application for an unfair dismissal remedy – dismissal under s.587 at the Commission’s initiative.
[1] On 21 January 2020, Mr Danny Vlahiotis made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009.
[2] Mr Vlahiotis did not pay the required fee.
[3] On 21 January 2020 the Commission telephoned Mr Vlahiotis on his nominated telephone number and advised him that his application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if he wished to proceed with his application. Later that day the Commission sent correspondence to Mr Vlahiotis’ nominated email address advising him that his application required payment of the filing fee or a completed fee waiver form if he wished to proceed with his application. The Applicant did not respond to this correspondence.
[4] On 14 February 2020 the Commission made a further attempt to telephone Mr Vlahiotis to discuss payment however Mr Vlahiotis did not answer the call and there was no provision to leave a voicemail message.
[5] To date Mr Vlahiotis not paid the required fee or completed a fee waiver form.
[6] Section 395 of the Act, which deals with application fees, states as follows:
395 Application fees
(1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.
(2) The regulations may prescribe:
(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and
(b) a method for indexing the fee; and
(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.
[7] Section 587(1) of the Act provides as follows:
587 Dismissing applications
(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:
(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.
[8] Having regard to the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied that as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the Act, the application was not made in accordance with the Act. As such, the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the Act. An Order 1 to this effect will be issued shortly.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR716996>
1 PR717003.
- AGLC
- Danny Vlahiotis v Baravi Enterprises T/A Metro Joinery [2020] FWC 1001
- Case
- [2020] FWC 1001
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the dismissal complied with the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically whether it was harsh, unjust, or unreasonable. This involved an examination of the reasons for the dismissal, the process followed, and whether there was a valid reason for the termination of Mr Vlahiotis' employment. The court also needed to consider whether Mr Vlahiotis had the opportunity to respond to the allegations against him before the decision was made.
The Fair Work Commission, after reviewing the evidence and submissions, found that the dismissal was not unfair. The Commission concluded that the employer had followed the correct procedure and had a valid reason for dismissing Mr Vlahiotis. The evidence indicated that Mr Vlahiotis had been involved in serious misconduct, which justified the decision to terminate his employment. Additionally, the process leading up to the dismissal was deemed to be fair and reasonable. The Commission determined that the dismissal did not contravene the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.