Daniels v Burfield

Case •

[1995] HCATrans 11

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry

Adelaide         No A8 of 1993

B e t w e e n -

GRAHAM KEITH DANIELS

Applicant

and

GEOFFREY BURFIELD

Respondent

Costs order

MASON CJ
TOOHEY J
McHUGH J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT CANBERRA ON WEDNESDAY, 15 FEBRUARY 1995, AT 10.19 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

McHUGH J:   Chief Justice Mason, Justice Toohey and myself considered the submissions of the applicant in relation to the costs of the application for special leave.  Those submissions disclosed nothing which displaces the operation of the ordinary rule.  Accordingly, special leave is refused with costs.

AT 10.19 AM THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED SINE DIE

Key Legal Topics

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

  • Negligence & Tort

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Causation

  • Damages

  • Duty of Care

  • Negligence

  • Reliance

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0