Daniel O'keefe v Gary Campbell T/A Gaz Roofing

Case

[2014] FWC 239

9 JANUARY 2014

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2014] FWC 239

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Daniel O’keefe
v
Gary Campbell T/A Gaz Roofing
(U2013/14371)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOOLEY

MELBOURNE, 9 JANUARY 2014

Application for relief from unfair dismissal dismissed.

[1] On 10 October 2013, an application under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for a remedy for unfair dismissal was lodged by Mr Daniel O'keefe.

[2] Mr O'keefe did not pay the required fee.

[3] On 11 October 2013, the Fair Work Commission (Commission) attempted to contact Mr O'keefe. A voice message was left advising Mr O’keefe that his application required payment of the ($65.50) filing fee or a completed waiver form if he wished to proceed with his application.

[4] Section 395, which deals with application fees, provides:

    395 Application fees

    (1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.

    (2) The regulations may prescribe:

      (a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and

      (b) a method for indexing the fee; and

      (c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.

[5] On 14 October 2013, the Commission sent email correspondence to Mr O'keefe advising that his application required payment, as his credit card details had declined.

[6] Further attempts to contact Mr O’keefe were made on 31 October 2013 and 12 December 2013 without success. No response was received from Mr O'keefe and payment of the required fee has not been made.

[7] Section 587(1) of the Act provides:

    587 Dismissing applications

    (1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

      (a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

      (b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

      (c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.

[8] Having regard to the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied that as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the Act, the application was not made in accordance with the Act. As such, the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the Act. An Order to this effect will be issued shortly.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR546652>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0