Daniel Hall v Australia United Pty Ltd
[2025] FWC 1049
•14 APRIL 2025
| [2025] FWC 1049 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION AND ORDER |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal
Daniel Hall
v
Australia United Pty Ltd
(U2025/935)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT EASTON | SYDNEY, 14 APRIL 2025 |
Application for an unfair dismissal remedy - minimum employment period – dismissal under s.587(1)(c) at the Commission’s initiative - application has no reasonable prospects of success.
On 24 January 2025 Mr Daniel Hall made an unfair dismissal application to the Fair Work Commission under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). Mr Hall was employed by Australia United Pty Ltd until he was dismissed on 7 January 2025.
Australia United Pty Ltd raised the jurisdictional objection that Mr Hall did not complete the minimum employment period. Sections 382 and 383 of the Fair Work Act 2009 require an Applicant to be ‘an employee who has completed a period of employment with his or her employer of at least the minimum employment period’. The minimum employment period is 6 months if the former employer is not a small business. A small business is when the employer has fewer than 15 employees. In the case that an employer is a small business, the minimum employment period is 12 months.
Commission staff tried to contact Mr Hall on 18 February and 6 March 2025 by email and SMS about whether he wanted to continue his unfair dismissal claim. Mr Hall has not responded to the Commission’s correspondence.
Section 587 allows the Commission to dismiss an application on the Commission’s own initiative in the early stages of the proceedings for want of prosecution. If an applicant’s conduct or omissions show that they are no longer willing to participate in their own case the Commission is not required to persevere with the application (see Viavattene v Health Care Australia [2013] FWCFB 2532 at [39]).
I am satisfied that Mr Hall has had the opportunity to put a case for consideration on all matters material to the decision to dismiss the application under s.587. In the circumstances I am satisfied that the facility under s.587 can and should be engaged to dismiss Mr Hall’s application. I make the following order:
1. The application under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) made by Mr Daniel Hall on 24 January 2025 is dismissed.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR786088>
0