Dalry and Dalry - [2007] FMCAfam 171

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

DALRY & DALRY

[2007] FMCAfam 171

FAMILY LAW – Property – marriage of approximately twenty-three years in duration – children of marriage aged 23 and 20 – major asset cane farm acquired from husband’s parents in part through donation and in part through subsidised purchase – weight to be given to such contributions – weight to be given to home making and parenting contributions – valuation issues – cane farm valued as both a farming concern and as “life style” blocks – highest and best use – assessment of s.75(2) factors – just and equitable.

Family Law Act 1975, ss,79, 75(2)

Commonwealth v Milledge (1953) 90CLR 157
Spencer v Commonwealth (1907) 5 CLR 418
Lee Steere v Lee Steere (1998) FLC 91-626
Ferraro v Ferraro (1993) FLC 92-335
Clauson v Clauson (1995) FLC 92-595
Wardman & Hudson (1978) FLC 90-466
TWN & PAQ [2005] FamCA 677
Pierce & Pierce [1999] FLC 92-844
Russell v Russell (1999) FamCA 187
D & D [2003] FamCA 473
Smith & Smith (1991) FLC 92-261
Waters & Jurek (1995) FLC 92-635
GVR v VAR [2006] FamCA 894
Rosati v Rosati (1998) FLC 92-804
Gosper & Gosper (1987) FLC 91-818
Kessey & Kessey (1994) FLC 92-495

Applicant:

MR DALRY

Respondent:

MS DALRY

File No:

TVM 2169 of 2006

Delivered on:

2 April 2007

Delivered at:

Adelaide

Hearing dates:

20 & 21 February 2007

Judgment of:

Brown FM

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant:

Ms Pagani

Solicitors for the Applicant:

J Hamilton & Associates

Counsel for the Respondent:

Mrs Pack SC

Solicitors for the Respondent:

M.S. Kelly & Co

ORDERS

The husband pay to the wife the sum of $175,000.00 within sixty (60) days of the date of these orders.
Concurrently with order 1 hereof the wife transfer to the husband all her right, title and interest in the cane farm being Lot 1 on Registered Plan 71xxx and Lots 5 and 6 on Registered Plan 73xxx.
The husband retain all the plant and equipment associated with the cane farm referred to in order 2 hereof and which is currently in his possession.
The Holden motor vehicle be sold as soon as is practicable and the husband take all necessary steps to place the aforesaid vehicle on the market at a price to be agreed between the parties and after the selling costs have been paid, the proceeds be divided so that the husband receive 70% of the proceeds and the wife receives 30%.
The husband indemnify the wife and keep her forever indemnified in respect of all debts owed by the parties to the National Australia Bank and to Mrs D Senior (the husband’s mother).
Concurrently with order 1 hereof the husband transfer to the wife, at the husband’s expense, all his interest in the Telstra shares and AMP shares currently jointly owned by the parties.
Unless otherwise specified in these orders:
(a)Each party be solely entitled to the exclusion of the other to all other property and chattels of whatsoever…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Continue reading Dalry and Dalry

Details

AGLC: Dalry and Dalry [2007] FMCAfam 171
Case: [2007] FMCAfam 171
Decision Date: 2 April 2007

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Dalry and Dalry, the parties were engaged in a dispute following the breakdown of their marriage. The wife sought financial orders pursuant to the Family Law Act, specifically focusing on property settlement. The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia was tasked with resolving the intricacies of this settlement. The court was required to determine the division of the couple's property, including the cane farm, motor vehicle, shares, and bank accounts, as well as address the allocation of debts and liabilities between the parties.

The court addressed several key legal issues, including the principles of fairness and equality in property division, the valuation of assets, and the implications of each party retaining their respective liabilities. The court considered the contributions of each spouse to the acquisition and maintenance of the assets, as well as future earning capacities and needs. In making its determinations, the court balanced the equitable distribution of property with the need to provide for the wife's reasonable ongoing needs. The court also gave weight to the husband's capacity to meet the financial orders made against him.

After careful consideration, the court ordered that the husband pay the wife $175,000 within sixty days, transfer his interest in certain shares to her, and indemnify her against specific debts. The wife was to transfer her interest in the cane farm to the husband. The court also directed the sale of a motor vehicle, with the proceeds to be divided between the parties in specified proportions. The court further delineated that each party was to be solely responsible for any liabilities associated with the property they retained. Additionally, the court reserved the right for the wife to seek further orders if the husband failed to comply with the primary financial order.

Orders

Orders of the court

The husband pay to the wife the sum of $175,000.00 within sixty (60) days of the date of these orders.

Concurrently with order 1 hereof the wife transfer to the husband all her right, title and interest in the cane farm being Lot 1 on Registered Plan 71xxx and Lots 5 and 6 on Registered Plan 73xxx.

The husband retain all the plant and equipment associated with the cane farm referred to in order 2 hereof and which is currently in his possession.

The Holden motor vehicle be sold as soon as is practicable and the husband take all necessary steps to place the aforesaid vehicle on the market at a price to be agreed between the parties and after the selling costs have been paid, the proceeds be divided so that the husband receive 70% of the proceeds and the wife receives 30%.

The husband indemnify the wife and keep her forever indemnified in respect of all debts owed by the parties to the National Australia Bank and to Mrs D Senior (the husband’s mother).

Concurrently with order 1 hereof the husband transfer to the wife, at the husband’s expense, all his interest in the Telstra shares and AMP shares currently jointly owned by the parties.

Unless otherwise specified in these orders:

(a) Each party be solely entitled to the exclusion of the other to all other property and chattels of whatsoever nature and kind in the possession of such party as at the date of these orders and that for this purpose bank accounts are deemed to be in the possession of the person whose name appears on the bank records thereof, insurance policies are deemed to be in the possession of the beneficiary thereof and superannuation entitlements are deemed to be in the possession of the person who is named as the worker whose age working future provides the conditions for payment out of such entitlements.

(b) Each party be solely liable for and indemnify the other against any liability encumbering any item of property to which that party is entitled pursuant to these orders.

The parties have liberty to apply for consequential orders in the event the husband is unable to comply with order 1 hereof.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.