[2014] FWCA 633 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Dajwood Pty Ltd
(AG2013/10347)
DAJWOOD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 24 JANUARY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Dajwood Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 5 December 2013 by Dajwood Pty Ltd for the approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Dajwood Enterprise Agreement 2013 (“the Agreement”).
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE406560 PR547165>
- AGLC
- Dajwood Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 633
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 633
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the FWC were whether the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and if it contained the necessary minimum terms as stipulated by the Fair Work Act 2009. The employer argued that the agreement was a product of genuine negotiation and covered all the essential minimum terms, while the union contended that the agreement failed to meet the legislative requirements due to procedural flaws in the negotiation process and deficiencies in the terms themselves. The FWC had to determine if the process and content of the agreement met the statutory standards for approval.
The FWC found that the negotiation process had indeed been genuine, as evidenced by the employer's proactive engagement with the union and the steps taken to reach a consensus. The FWC also confirmed that the agreement contained all the necessary minimum terms required by the Fair Work Act 2009. Consequently, the FWC approved the Dajwood Enterprise Agreement 2013 and ordered its registration. This decision ensured that the agreement would now legally bind both parties, providing a framework for employment terms and conditions moving forward.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.