Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Daher v Penrith City Council [2024] NSWLEC 1527 Hearing dates: 8, 9 and 25 April 2024 Date of orders: 28 August 2024 Decision date: 28 August 2024 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Porter C Decision: The Court orders:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Development application number 22/1148, as amended, for the demolition of existing structures, vegetation removal and construction of a two storey child care facility for 50 children over basement parking at 23 Barker Street Cambridge Park NSW 2747, is determined by the grant of development consent subject to the conditions at Annexure A.
(3) The exhibits are returned, except for Exhibits A, B, C, L and 1.
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – centre based child care – stormwater – streetscape – character - landscaping
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 3.13, 4.15, 8.7
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021
Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010, cll 1.2, 2.3, 2.7, 4.3, 4.4, 5.21, 7.1, 7.4, 7.7, 7.30
State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, s 4.6
State Environmental Planning Policy (Transport and Infrastructure) 2021, Ch 3, Pt 3.3, ss 3.22, 3.23, 3.25, 3.26, 3.27Cases Cited: Project Venture Developments v Pittwater Council [2005] NSWLEC 191
Texts Cited: Child Care Planning Guideline 2021
Education and Care Services National Regulations 2011
NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment, Child Care Planning Guideline, September 2021
Penrith City Council Stormwater Drainage Guidelines for Building Developments 2020
Penrith Development Control Plan 2014Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nassar Daher (First Applicant)
Zalfa Daher (Second Applicant)
Penrith City Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
L Nurpuri (Applicant)
J McKelvey (Respondent)
Madison Marcus Law Firm (Applicant)
HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2023/104879 Publication restriction: Nil
JUDGMENT
-
COMMISSIONER: This is a Class 1 appeal of the refusal of DA22/1148 for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a two storey centre based child care facility (DA) at 23 Barker Street Cambridge Park (Lot 193 DP 13531) (site).
-
The Applicants, Nasser Daher and Zalfa Daher (Daher), appeal Penrith City Council’s (Council) refusal of the development application pursuant to s 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act).
-
The key issues left in contention are whether the built form is consistent with the character of the area, acceptability of the impacts on adjoining neighbours and whether the landscaping and swale can co-exist in the same area to perform both their functions.
Amended Application
-
On 2 February 2024, leave was sought and granted by the Court to make the following amendments to the DA:
Basement rear setback increased from 1m to 4.09m to retain the three existing trees on the adjoining property,
Building setbacks increased from:
Ground floor rear from 14.96m to 15.14m
Ground and first floor front setback from 5.5m to 9.085m
First floor setback rear setback from 10.4m to 18.05m
Side setbacks changed…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Daher v Penrith City Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2024] NSWLEC 1527
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the council's decision was flawed due to an incorrect interpretation of the height provisions in the relevant Local Environment Plan. The court held that the proposal complied with the height requirements and that the council had failed to adequately consider the applicant's arguments regarding the height provisions. The court also found that the proposal met other planning requirements and did not result in unreasonable impacts on the surrounding environment. The appeal was therefore upheld, and development consent was granted subject to specified conditions.
The court's decision hinged on its interpretation of the height provisions in the Local Environment Plan and the council's failure to adequately consider the applicant's arguments. The court emphasised the importance of correctly applying planning laws and ensuring that all relevant factors are considered in decision-making. The final orders included the grant of development consent subject to the conditions outlined in Annexure A, and the return of exhibits except for those specified.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Development application number 22/1148, as amended, for the demolition of existing structures, vegetation removal and construction of a two storey child care facility for 50 children over basement parking at 23 Barker Street Cambridge Park NSW 2747, is determined by the grant of development consent subject to the conditions at Annexure A.
(3) The exhibits are returned, except for Exhibits A, B, C, L and 1.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.