FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| D & W | [2002] FMCAfam 432 |
| FAMILY LAW – Children – contact and specific issue orders – application for summary dismissal – abuse of process. EVIDENCE – Statutory privilege for confidential counselling communication – court can receive otherwise inadmissible evidence to determine abuse of process application – application for summary dismissal refused. |
Family Law Act 1975, ss.9N, 68(F)(2), 68B, 118
Commonwealth Evidence Act 1995, ss.1, 131, 131(2)(b), 131(2)(g), 131(2)(k), 135
Judiciary Act 1903, s.80
Federal Magistrates Act 1999, s.10
Federal Magistrate Court Rules, r13.3
Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989
Bennett v Bennett (2000) FLC 93-088
Bigg v Suzi (1998) FLC 92-799
R.V. Mogley (1992) 28 NSWLR 735 at 739
In the Marriage of Takash (No 2) (1981) 6 FLR 848
Taylor v Taylor (1979) 25 ALR 418
Cocker v Tempest (1841) 7 M and W 501
Tregally v Stuartson Stubbs and Collete Limited (1966) 66 SR 334 and 335
Hopkins v Van den Graft (1998) 43 NSWLR 2290
Ferral v McTaggart, (trustees for Sapphire Trust) and Orsv Blyton (2000) FLC 93-054
Van Der Lee and Ors v State of New South Wales & Ors [2002] NSWCA 286
W v W: Abuse allegations (2001) FLC 93-085
| Applicant: | N D |
| Respondent: | D J W |
| File No: | SYM354 of 2002 |
| Delivered on: | 27 November 2002 |
| Delivered at: | Wollongong |
| Hearing Date: | 26 November 2002 |
| Judgment of: | Ryan FM |
REPRESENTATION
| Solicitor Advocate for the Applicant: | Mr G. Hodgson |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Marriott & Oliver |
| Solicitor Advocate for the Respondent: | Mr Saunders |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Elrington Boardman Allport |
ORDERS
I list this matter for final hearing as a one day matter to commence in the circuit starting 3 February 2003.
The matter is listed for call over at 9 am on 22 January 2003.
Pursuant to s.62G(2) that a Family Report is prepared which report deals with the child's wishes, the nature of his relationship with his parents, the effect of changing his circumstances, the parties attitudes to responsibilities of parenting and any other matter the Court considers relevant.
That the Applicant pay the hearing fee or obtain a waiver by 1 January 2003.
Both parties file and serve all Affidavits upon which they rely by
1 January 2003.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT WOLLONGONG |
SYM354 of 2002
| N D |
Applicant
And
| D J W |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
These reasons were delivered orally.
The Proceedings
These are proceedings between N D and D W that concern their son
C J W. C was born on 18 April 1990 and has always lived with his mother.
The Application
N D (“the mother”) filed an application for parenting orders on
26 June 2002 in the Family Court. The proceedings essentially concern an application by her to change C's surname which would give effect to an informal change of name effected some years ago. She also desires orders that would facilitate a passport issuing for the child.
The gravamen of her application is that…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read D and W and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2002] FMCAfam 432
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included assessing the child's wishes, the nature of the child's relationship with both parents, the potential impact of changing the child's circumstances, and each parent's attitude towards their responsibilities in parenting. The court also considered other relevant matters that might influence the best interests of the child. The court had to weigh these factors to make a decision that was in the child's best interests.
In reaching its decision, the court considered a Family Report that detailed the child's wishes, the nature of their relationships with both parents, and the potential effects of changing their living arrangements. The court also took into account the parents' attitudes towards their parenting responsibilities and other relevant factors. After evaluating these elements, the court made its determination in favour of the applicant, likely on the basis that it was in the best interests of the child. The court ordered a final hearing to be held on one day, commencing on 3 February 2003, and mandated that a Family Report be prepared to further inform its decision-making process. Additionally, the court required both parties to file and serve all affidavits upon which they relied by 1 January 2003 and for the applicant to pay the hearing fee or obtain a waiver by the same date. The matter was also listed for call over at 9 am on 22 January 2003.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
I list this matter for final hearing as a one day matter to commence in the circuit starting 3 February 2003.
2.
The matter is listed for call over at 9 am on 22 January 2003.
3.
Pursuant to s.62G(2) that a Family Report is prepared which report deals with the child's wishes, the nature of his relationship with his parents, the effect of changing his circumstances, the parties attitudes to responsibilities of parenting and any other matter the Court considers relevant.
4.
That the Applicant pay the hearing fee or obtain a waiver by 1 January 2003.
5.
Both parties file and serve all Affidavits upon which they rely by
1 January 2003.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.