FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| D & B | [2006] FMCAfam 437 |
| FAMILY LAW – Application to discharge child maintenance arrears – doctrines of res judicata and Anshun estoppel – just cause – circumstances of the parties – arrears varied – recommendation that penalty be waived if arrears paid within say five years. |
| Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 Family Law Act 1975, ss.66B, 66C, 66S, 66W |
| Cameron & Helie [2004] FMCAfam 685 Kelly & Kelly (1996) FLC 92-680 Lutzke & Lutzke (1979) FLC 90-714 P & D [2003] FMCAfam 461 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 Reid & Reid (1978) FLC 90-529 Roche & Glenn (2002) FLC 93-123 Spry & Roet (1977) FLC 90-301 Vakil & Vakil (1997) FLC 92-743 Wong v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 242 |
| Applicant: | RJD |
| Respondent: | CJB (McGEE) |
| File Number: | CAM 1247 of 2004 |
| Judgment of: | Mowbray FM |
| Hearing dates: | 18 February, 6 June, 11 July & 9 September 2005 |
| Date of last submission: | 23 September 2005 |
| Delivered at: | Canberra |
| Delivered on: | 21 August 2006 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr G Howard |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Farrar Gesini & Dunn |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Ms J Godtschalk |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Crowley Clifford Simpson |
ORDERS
The order of 4 July 2006 staying the father’s liability to pay child maintenance or any arrears of child maintenance be discharged.
Pursuant to section 66W(2)(b) of the Family Law Act 1975 the father’s obligation to pay maintenance between 1 July 2000 and 30 December 2004 for the children, DJD born 19 January 1984 and JAD born 30 December 1986, be reduced to that for which he would liable if the formula under the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 had been applied to the father’s taxable income for the relevant years.
I request that the Child Support Registrar give consideration to waiving all late payment penalties owed by the father if the arrears in maintenance debt are paid within say five years.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT CANBERRA |
CAM 1247 of 2004
| RJD |
Applicant
And
| CJB (McGEE) |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The applicant father asks the Court to discharge all of his child maintenance debt or alternatively to reduce the arrears. At the end of August 2005 he had a child maintenance debt of $8,964.94 and a late payment penalty debt of $4,981.68. The total outstanding was therefore $13,946.62. The respondent mother wants the application dismissed.
Background
The father was born in June 1955. He is thus now 51 years of age. The mother was born in March 1957. She is now 49 years of age.
The parties were married in June 1985 and separated approximately nine months later. They were divorced in December 1987.
There are two children of the marriage, the subject of this application, DJD born in January 1984 aged 22 and JAD born in December 1986 aged 19.
The father has two other children, LN born in April 1983 aged 23 and JD…
Continue reading D and B
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- D and B [2006] FMCAfam 437
- Case
- [2006] FMCAfam 437
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the father's obligation to pay maintenance could be reduced to that which he would be liable for under the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989. This required the court to consider the relevant provisions of the Family Law Act 1975, including section 66W(2)(b), and to determine if the father's obligation could be adjusted in accordance with the child support formula.
The court found that the father's obligation to pay maintenance should indeed be reduced to that which he would be liable for under the child support formula for the period between 1 July 2000 and 30 December 2004. The court considered it appropriate to discharge the father's liability to pay child maintenance or any arrears of child maintenance, and to request the Child Support Registrar to consider waiving any late payment penalties if the arrears were paid within a specified period.
The final orders of the court were to discharge the stay on the father's liability to pay child maintenance or any arrears of child maintenance, to reduce the father's obligation to pay maintenance for the specified period to that which he would be liable for under the child support formula, and to request the Child Support Registrar to consider waiving any late payment penalties if the arrears were paid within five years.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The order of 4 July 2006 staying the father’s liability to pay child maintenance or any arrears of child maintenance be discharged.
2.
Pursuant to section 66W(2)(b) of the Family Law Act 1975 the father’s obligation to pay maintenance between 1 July 2000 and 30 December 2004 for the children, DJD born 19 January 1984 and JAD born 30 December 1986, be reduced to that for which he would liable if the formula under the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 had been applied to the father’s taxable income for the relevant years.
3.
I request that the Child Support Registrar give consideration to waiving all late payment penalties owed by the father if the arrears in maintenance debt are paid within say five years.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.