Cycon Civil Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWCA 1735


[2025] FWCA 1735

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.218A - application to vary an agreement to correct or amend errors, defects or irregularities

Cycon Civil Pty Ltd

(AG2025/1347)

CYCON CIVIL PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) CIVIL & INFRASTRUCTURE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024 - 2027

(ODN AG2025/734) [AE528497]

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER PLATT

ADELAIDE, 26 MAY 2025

Application for variation of the CYCON CIVIL PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Civil & Infrastructure Enterprise Agreement 2024 - 2027

  1. On 7 May 2025, Cycon Civil Pty Ltd (the Applicant) made an application pursuant to s.218(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act), to vary the CYCON CIVIL PTY LTD and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Civil & Infrastructure Enterprise Agreement 2024 - 2027 (the Agreement) to correct or amend an obvious error, defect or irregularity.

  1. The Agreement was approved by the Commission on 28 March 2025 and commenced operation on 4 April 2025.[1] The Applicant is the Employer covered by the Agreement. The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) is also covered by the Agreement.

  1. The Applicant seeks the following variations to the Agreement (emphasised in bold):

·  The definition of ‘Employer’ in Clause 2:

Cycon Civil Group Pty Ltd
ABN: 20 550 903 881

·  The title of the Agreement:

‘Cycon Civil Group Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Civil & Infrastructure Enterprise Agreement 2024–2027’

  1. The Applicant submits the variations were caused as a result of administrative error and that the Agreement title and employer name should be varied to reflect the correct legal entity of the employer. The Applicant also submits the variations are consistent with the information that was communicated to employees during the vote. I note the Agreement title on the NERR which was submitted with the s.185 approval application is consistent with the proposed variation.

  1. I have sought the views of the CFMEU. No view was expressed. Accordingly, I have determined the matter based on the material filed.

  1. The errors, which were not identified until after the Agreement was approved, are errors of substance and would therefore fall within the scope of s.218A(1).

  1. The application is made in accordance with the requirements of s.218A(2)(b)(i) of the Act.

  1. I have determined to approve the variation sought which will operate from 26 May 2025.


COMMISSIONER


[1] [2025] FWCA 1075.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE528497  PR787591>

Details
AGLC
Cycon Civil Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 1735
Case
[2025] FWCA 1735
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Cycon Civil Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission to vary an enterprise agreement to correct errors that appeared after the agreement was approved. The applicant sought changes to the definition of ‘Employer’ and the title of the agreement to reflect the correct legal entity of the employer, as they believed the errors were due to administrative mistakes. The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union, which is also a party to the agreement, did not provide any views on the application.

The legal issues before the Commission were whether the errors in the agreement were obvious and whether the application complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission determined that the errors were of substance and would fall within the scope of s.218A(1) of the Act, and that the application met the requirements of s.218A(2)(b)(i). The Commission concluded that the application should be approved.

The Fair Work Commission approved the application to vary the agreement to correct the errors. The variations will operate from 26 May 2025. The Commission found that the errors were obvious and that the application was made in accordance with the requirements of the Act. The Commission did not receive any views from the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union on the application, so it determined the matter based on the material filed. The changes will correct the definition of ‘Employer’ and the title of the agreement to reflect the correct legal entity of the employer.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.