Curtis v Goodin (Liquidator)

Link copied
Case Copied 7 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Curtis v Goodin (Liquidator) [2020] FCA 335

File number: WAD 506 of 2019
Judge: COLVIN J
Date of judgment: 12 March 2020
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - application by liquidator for order under s 477(2B) of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - where liquidator seeks to enter into settlement agreement and leases - where liquidator deposed that settlement agreement and leases advance effective realisation of company's assets - where no suggestion of impropriety, lack of good faith or error of principle by liquidator - order made
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 477
Cases cited:

Hurst, in the matter of Liquor National Pty Ltd (in liq) [2019] FCA 1581

In the matter of One.Tel Limited [2014] NSWSC 457

Lewis & Templeton & Warehouse Sales Pty Ltd (in liq) v LG Electronics Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] VSC 63; (2016) 48 VR 450

Re Red Lancer Pty Ltd (in liq); Ex parte Bumbak [2019] WASC 450

Re The Bell Group Ltd (in Liq) [2009] WASC 235

Stewart, in the matter of Newtronics Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1375

Vickers, in the matter of York Street Mezzanine Pty Ltd (in liq) [2011] FCA 1028; (2011) 196 FCR 479

Date of hearing: 12 March 2020
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 9
Counsel for the Plaintiffs: Ms KM McNally
Solicitor for the Plaintiffs: McNally & Co
Counsel for the Defendants: Mr DW John
Solicitor for the Defendants: Herbert Smith Freehills

ORDERS

WAD 506 of 2019
BETWEEN:

ADAM CURTIS

First Plaintiff

KHALED ADNAN MOHAMMED SUHEIMAT

Second Plaintiff

KLAUDIA ELZBIETA LESZYK & SERGE EUGENE GREGORY GEBERT

Third Plaintiff

COREY FITZPATRICK
Fourth Plaintiff

AND:

PETER GOODIN AS LIQUIDATOR OF TORCREST DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 100 585 626) (IN LIQ)

First Defendant

TORCREST DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 100 585 626) (IN LIQ)

Second Defendant

JUDGE:

COLVIN J

DATE OF ORDER:

12 MARCH 2020

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.An order that the Interlocutory Application dated 11 March 2020 stand as an originating process.

2.An order under s 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that Peter Goodin as liquidator of Torcrest Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) (Torcrest) may enter into the following agreements on behalf of Torcrest:

(a)the Car Bay Lease with Adam Curtis which is Annexure PG24 to the Affidavit of Peter Goodin which is filed herein and dated 10 March 2020 (Goodin Affidavit);

(b)the Car Bay Lease with Klaudia Elzbieta Gebert (nee Leszyk) and Serge Gebert which is PG25 to the Goodin Affidavit;

(c)the Car Bay Lease with Khaled Adrian Mohammed Suheimat which is PG26 to the Goodin Affidavit;

(d)the Car Bay Lease with Corey Fitzpatrick which is PG27 of the Goodin Affidavit;

(e)the settlement agreement with the plaintiffs as recorded in the exchange of correspondence which is PG28 and PG29 to the Goodin Affidavit.

3.An order that the costs of this application be costs in the winding up of Torcrest.

Note:   Entry…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Curtis v Goodin (Liquidator) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2020] FCA 335
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Curtis v Goodin (Liquidator), the Federal Court was presented with an application by a liquidator seeking authorisation to enter into various agreements, including leases and a settlement agreement, on behalf of a liquidated company. The liquidator argued that these agreements would facilitate the effective realisation of the company’s assets, which was a pertinent consideration in the winding up of the company. The primary legal issue the court needed to address was whether the proposed agreements were in the best interests of the company's creditors and members, and if the liquidator’s actions were in compliance with the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

The court reviewed the affidavit deposed by the liquidator, Peter Goodin, and found that it provided sufficient evidence that the proposed settlement and leases would indeed promote an effective realisation of the company's assets. The court further noted that there was no suggestion of impropriety, lack of good faith, or any error of principle in the liquidator’s actions. The primary focus was on whether the proposed actions would benefit the company’s creditors and members, which the court determined they would. The liquidator's actions were deemed to be in line with the statutory requirements and the overarching objectives of the Corporations Act.

Based on the above findings, the court granted the liquidator’s application. The court made an order that the Interlocutory Application dated 11 March 2020 stand as an originating process, and authorised the liquidator to enter into the specified leases and the settlement agreement as detailed in the application. Additionally, the court ordered that the costs of the application be costs in the winding up of the company, in accordance with Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. An order that the Interlocutory Application dated 11 March 2020 stand as an originating process.

2. An order under s 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that Peter Goodin as liquidator of Torcrest Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) (Torcrest) may enter into the following agreements on behalf of Torcrest:

(a) the Car Bay Lease with Adam Curtis which is Annexure PG24 to the Affidavit of Peter Goodin which is filed herein and dated 10 March 2020 (Goodin Affidavit);

(b) the Car Bay Lease with Klaudia Elzbieta Gebert (nee Leszyk) and Serge Gebert which is PG25 to the Goodin Affidavit;

(c) the Car Bay Lease with Khaled Adrian Mohammed Suheimat which is PG26 to the Goodin Affidavit;

(d) the Car Bay Lease with Corey Fitzpatrick which is PG27 of the Goodin Affidavit;

(e) the settlement agreement with the plaintiffs as recorded in the exchange of correspondence which is PG28 and PG29 to the Goodin Affidavit.

3. An order that the costs of this application be costs in the winding up of Torcrest.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.