FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Curtis v Goodin (Liquidator) [2020] FCA 335
File number: WAD 506 of 2019 Judge: COLVIN J Date of judgment: 12 March 2020 Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - application by liquidator for order under s 477(2B) of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - where liquidator seeks to enter into settlement agreement and leases - where liquidator deposed that settlement agreement and leases advance effective realisation of company's assets - where no suggestion of impropriety, lack of good faith or error of principle by liquidator - order made Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 477 Cases cited: Hurst, in the matter of Liquor National Pty Ltd (in liq) [2019] FCA 1581
In the matter of One.Tel Limited [2014] NSWSC 457
Lewis & Templeton & Warehouse Sales Pty Ltd (in liq) v LG Electronics Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] VSC 63; (2016) 48 VR 450
Re Red Lancer Pty Ltd (in liq); Ex parte Bumbak [2019] WASC 450
Re The Bell Group Ltd (in Liq) [2009] WASC 235
Stewart, in the matter of Newtronics Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1375
Vickers, in the matter of York Street Mezzanine Pty Ltd (in liq) [2011] FCA 1028; (2011) 196 FCR 479
Date of hearing: 12 March 2020 Registry: Western Australia Division: General Division National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 9 Counsel for the Plaintiffs: Ms KM McNally Solicitor for the Plaintiffs: McNally & Co Counsel for the Defendants: Mr DW John Solicitor for the Defendants: Herbert Smith Freehills ORDERS
WAD 506 of 2019 BETWEEN: ADAM CURTIS
First Plaintiff
KHALED ADNAN MOHAMMED SUHEIMAT
Second Plaintiff
KLAUDIA ELZBIETA LESZYK & SERGE EUGENE GREGORY GEBERT
Third Plaintiff
COREY FITZPATRICK
Fourth PlaintiffAND: PETER GOODIN AS LIQUIDATOR OF TORCREST DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 100 585 626) (IN LIQ)
First Defendant
TORCREST DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 100 585 626) (IN LIQ)
Second Defendant
JUDGE:
COLVIN J
DATE OF ORDER:
12 MARCH 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.An order that the Interlocutory Application dated 11 March 2020 stand as an originating process.
2.An order under s 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that Peter Goodin as liquidator of Torcrest Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) (Torcrest) may enter into the following agreements on behalf of Torcrest:
(a)the Car Bay Lease with Adam Curtis which is Annexure PG24 to the Affidavit of Peter Goodin which is filed herein and dated 10 March 2020 (Goodin Affidavit);
(b)the Car Bay Lease with Klaudia Elzbieta Gebert (nee Leszyk) and Serge Gebert which is PG25 to the Goodin Affidavit;
(c)the Car Bay Lease with Khaled Adrian Mohammed Suheimat which is PG26 to the Goodin Affidavit;
(d)the Car Bay Lease with Corey Fitzpatrick which is PG27 of the Goodin Affidavit;
(e)the settlement agreement with the plaintiffs as recorded in the exchange of correspondence which is PG28 and PG29 to the Goodin Affidavit.
3.An order that the costs of this application be costs in the winding up of Torcrest.
Note: Entry…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Curtis v Goodin (Liquidator) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2020] FCA 335
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court reviewed the affidavit deposed by the liquidator, Peter Goodin, and found that it provided sufficient evidence that the proposed settlement and leases would indeed promote an effective realisation of the company's assets. The court further noted that there was no suggestion of impropriety, lack of good faith, or any error of principle in the liquidator’s actions. The primary focus was on whether the proposed actions would benefit the company’s creditors and members, which the court determined they would. The liquidator's actions were deemed to be in line with the statutory requirements and the overarching objectives of the Corporations Act.
Based on the above findings, the court granted the liquidator’s application. The court made an order that the Interlocutory Application dated 11 March 2020 stand as an originating process, and authorised the liquidator to enter into the specified leases and the settlement agreement as detailed in the application. Additionally, the court ordered that the costs of the application be costs in the winding up of the company, in accordance with Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. An order that the Interlocutory Application dated 11 March 2020 stand as an originating process.
2. An order under s 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that Peter Goodin as liquidator of Torcrest Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) (Torcrest) may enter into the following agreements on behalf of Torcrest:
(a) the Car Bay Lease with Adam Curtis which is Annexure PG24 to the Affidavit of Peter Goodin which is filed herein and dated 10 March 2020 (Goodin Affidavit);
(b) the Car Bay Lease with Klaudia Elzbieta Gebert (nee Leszyk) and Serge Gebert which is PG25 to the Goodin Affidavit;
(c) the Car Bay Lease with Khaled Adrian Mohammed Suheimat which is PG26 to the Goodin Affidavit;
(d) the Car Bay Lease with Corey Fitzpatrick which is PG27 of the Goodin Affidavit;
(e) the settlement agreement with the plaintiffs as recorded in the exchange of correspondence which is PG28 and PG29 to the Goodin Affidavit.
3. An order that the costs of this application be costs in the winding up of Torcrest.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.