Curry v The State of Western Australia
Case
•
[2023] WASCA 10
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Curry v The State of Western Australia [2023] WASCA 10
[2023] WASCA 10
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Simon Patrick Curry appealed against his sentence for conspiring to pervert the course of justice. The Court of Appeal considered two grounds of appeal. The first ground of appeal asserted that the appellant's sentence infringed the parity principle when regard was had to the sentences imposed on co-offenders Steven Taylor and Gary Rodgers. The second ground of appeal asserted that the appellant's overall total effective sentence infringed the first limb of the totality principle. The Court of Appeal found that neither ground of appeal was meritorious. The appeal was dismissed. Leave to appeal was refused.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Sentencing
-
Parity Principle
-
Totality Principle
-
Contempt of Court
-
Criminal Liability
-
Mens Rea & Intention
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Labrook v Director of Public Prosecutions (WA) [2025] WASC 106
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Labrook v Director of Public Prosecutions (WA)
[2025] WASC 106
May v Director of Public Prosecutions for Western Australia
[2023] WASC 117
Labrook v Director of Public Prosecutions (WA)
[2025] WASC 106
Cases Cited
11
Statutory Material Cited
0
Curry v The State of Western Australia
[2022] WASCA 36
Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen
[2011] HCA 49
Stanley v The State of Western Australia
[2018] WASCA 229