FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Currie, in the matter of Auto Electrical Distributors (Aust) Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Auto Electrical Distributors (Aust) Pty Ltd (In Liq) [2014] FCA 885
Citation: Currie, in the matter of Auto Electrical Distributors (Aust) Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Auto Electrical Distributors (Aust) Pty Ltd (In Liq) [2014] FCA 885
Parties: IAN ALEXANDER CURRIE AS LIQUIDATOR OF AUTO ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS (AUST) PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 076 531 916 v AUTO ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS (AUST) PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 076 531 916 File number: QUD 184 of 2014 Judge: DOWSETT J Date of judgment: 25 July 2014 Cases cited: Divitkos in Re Ex DVD Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) [2014] FCA 696 cited Date of hearing: 25 July 2014 Place: Brisbane Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: No Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 1 Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Bennett & Philp Lawyers Solicitor for the Defendant: Defendant did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
QUD 184 of 2014
IN THE MATTER OF AUTO ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS (AUST) PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 076 531 916
BETWEEN: IAN ALEXANDER CURRIE AS LIQUIDATOR OF AUTO ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS (AUST) PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 076 531 916
PlaintiffAND: AUTO ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS (AUST) PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 076 531 916
Defendant
JUDGE:
DOWSETT J
DATE OF ORDER:
25 JULY 2014
WHERE MADE:
BRISBANE
THE COURT DIRECTS THAT:
1.the plaintiff is authorised to pay the balance of the funds in the liquidation of the defendant (after payment of his proper fees and disbursements) to Nourlangie Pty Ltd ACN 010 118 804 pursuant to s 511 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); and
2.the Court orders that the plaintiff’s costs of and incidental to this application be costs in the liquidation of the defendant.
Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
QUD 184 of 2014
IN THE MATTER OF AUTO ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS (AUST) PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 076 531 916
BETWEEN: IAN ALEXANDER CURRIE AS LIQUIDATOR OF AUTO ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS (AUST) PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 076 531 916
PlaintiffAND: AUTO ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS (AUST) PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 076 531 916
Defendant
JUDGE:
DOWSETT J
DATE:
25 JULY 2014
PLACE:
BRISBANE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Having regard to the reasons of White J in Divitkos in Re Ex DVD Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) [2014] FCA 696 and the earlier decisions there referred to, I am satisfied to proceed upon the basis that the secured creditor is entitled to be subrogated to the rights of the employees whose claims against the company it met, and in those circumstances to give the directions sought.
I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Dowsett. Associate:
Dated: 20 August 2014
- AGLC
- Currie, in the matter of Auto Electrical Distributors (Aust) Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Auto Electrical Distributors (Aust) Pty Ltd (In Liq) [2014] FCA 885
- Case
- [2014] FCA 885
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the secured creditor, who had previously met the claims of employees against the company, was entitled to be subrogated to those employees' rights and thus entitled to the remaining funds. The court had to decide whether the secured creditor could be subrogated to the rights of the employees under section 511 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
Justice Dowsett determined that, following the reasoning in Divitkos in Re Ex DVD Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) [2014] FCA 696, the secured creditor was entitled to be subrogated to the rights of the employees. The court accepted that the secured creditor had a right to be paid from the remaining funds in the liquidation. Consequently, the court authorised the liquidator to pay the balance of the funds to Nourlangie Pty Ltd, the secured creditor, after deducting the liquidator's proper fees and disbursements. Additionally, the court ordered that the plaintiff's costs of and incidental to the application be costs in the liquidation of the defendant.
The court's decision and the final orders were that the liquidator was authorised to distribute the remaining funds to the secured creditor, Nourlangie Pty Ltd, and that the liquidator's costs were to be treated as costs in the liquidation of the defendant company. The court's ruling was based on the established legal principle of subrogation, which allows a creditor who has paid a debt to step into the shoes of the debtor's creditor.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.