FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| CUNNINGHAM v GREEN | [2011] FMCA 515 |
| BANKRUPTCY – Application by respondent trustee in bankruptcy for distribution of dividends – failure by bankrupt to file statement of affairs – obligations imposed upon trustees pursuant to s.146 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). |
| Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss.51(1), 140(1), 146 |
| Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Thor [2006] FMCA 1637 Re Shaw; Ex parte Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [1999] FCA 968 Re Sturt; Ex parte Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2001] FCA 1649 |
| Applicant: | JOHN WILLIAM CUNNINGHAM |
| Respondent: | TONI JOY GREEN |
| File Number: | BRG 471 of 2011 |
| Judgment of: | Burnett FM |
| Hearing date: | 22 June 2011 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 22 June 2011 |
| Delivered at: | Brisbane |
| Delivered on: | 22 June 2011 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Ferguson Cannon Lawyers |
| There was no appearance by the Respondent |
ORDERS
That pursuant to s.146 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) a distribution of dividends be made available to those creditors of the bankrupt estate of the Respondent who prove their debts in accordance with Part VI Division 5 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), as if the bankrupt had filed a statement of affairs in accordance with the prescribed form and those creditors had been stated to be creditors in it.
That the costs of the Applicant be taxed from the bankrupt estate of the Respondent.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT BRISBANE |
BRG 471 of 2011
| JOHN WILLIAM CUNNINGHAM |
Applicant
And
| TONI JOY GREEN |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Revised from transcript)
This application by the respondent, Toni Joy Green’s trustee in bankruptcy, John William Cunningham, seeks orders pursuant to s.146 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) (the Act) for the distribution of dividends to be made to creditors of the bankrupt estate of the bankrupt in favour of those whose debts have been proved in accordance with Part VI Division 5 of the Act. Section 146 provides that where a bankrupt has failed to file a statement of his or her affairs as required by this Act, the court may, on the application of the trustee, upon such terms as it thinks fit, order that distribution of dividends among the creditors who have proved their debts shall proceed in accordance with this division, as if the bankrupt had filed a statement of his or her affairs, and those creditors had been stated to be creditors in it.
In this instance the bankrupt was sequestrated by order of the court made on 11 February 2009. The applicant trustee was also appointed on that date. Following appointment, the trustee made numerous requests and attempts for the bankrupt to complete and file a statement of affairs. Notwithstanding those efforts, no statement of affairs has been filed. In addition, the Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia also attempted to locate the bankrupt to prosecute her for failing to make out her statement and file her statement of affairs pursuant to s.51(1) of the Act. It seems nothing has come of those efforts.
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Cunningham v Green and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2011] FMCA 515
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the absence of a statement of affairs by the Respondent precluded the distribution of dividends to creditors, and if so, what alternative mechanism could be applied to ensure creditors were compensated. The court also considered the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) and the implications of the Respondent's failure to comply with the statutory requirement to file a statement of affairs.
In determining the matter, the court held that the absence of a statement of affairs did not prevent the distribution of dividends to creditors who could prove their debts. The court reasoned that the Act provided a mechanism for creditors to prove their debts in the absence of a formal statement of affairs. The court found that it was appropriate to treat the creditors as if they had been stated in a hypothetical statement of affairs. This interpretation ensured that creditors were not disadvantaged by the Respondent's non-compliance. Consequently, the court ordered that dividends be distributed to those creditors who could substantiate their claims, and that the costs of the application be borne by the Respondent's estate.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That pursuant to s.146 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) a distribution of dividends be made available to those creditors of the bankrupt estate of the Respondent who prove their debts in accordance with Part VI Division 5 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), as if the bankrupt had filed a statement of affairs in accordance with the prescribed form and those creditors had been stated to be creditors in it.
2.
That the costs of the Applicant be taxed from the bankrupt estate of the Respondent.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.