CSR Limited

Case [2014] FWCA 8337


[2014] FWCA 8337
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

CSR Limited
(AG2014/9386)

CSR BRADFORD BRENDALE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Manufacturing and associated industries

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT DRAKE

SYDNEY, 21 NOVEMBER 2014

Application for approval of the CSR Bradford Brendale Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the CSR Bradford Brendale Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by CSR Limited. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Agreement was lodged within 14 days after it was made.

[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to the application for approval have been met.

[4] The Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers that organisation.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s54 of the Act, will operate from 28 November 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 April 2017.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE411298  PR558060>

Details
AGLC
CSR Limited [2014] FWCA 8337
Case
[2014] FWCA 8337
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, CSR Limited, sought approval of the CSR Bradford Brendale Enterprise Agreement 2014 from the Fair Work Commission. The agreement sought to regulate the terms and conditions of employment for certain employees. The dispute centred on whether the agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it was appropriately made.

The key legal issues before the court were whether the agreement was genuinely a product of agreement between the parties, and whether it met the procedural requirements of the Fair Work Act. This included assessing whether proper consultation had occurred and whether the agreement covered the necessary matters. Additionally, the court needed to consider whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and whether it complied with the ‘better off overall test’.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was genuinely made by the parties and satisfied the procedural requirements of the Act. The agreement had been the result of genuine bargaining, and the parties had properly consulted with each other. The Commission also determined that the agreement covered the necessary matters and met the ‘better off overall test’, ensuring that employees were not disadvantaged by the agreement. Consequently, the court approved the enterprise agreement.

The Fair Work Commission granted approval of the CSR Bradford Brendale Enterprise Agreement 2014. The decision underscores the importance of genuine bargaining and proper consultation in the creation of enterprise agreements. The court's approval of the agreement reflects its compliance with the requirements of the Fair Work Act, including the ‘better off overall test’. This case serves as a reminder of the rigorous standards that must be met for an enterprise agreement to be approved by the Commission.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.