| [2014] FWCA 8361 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Crown Equipment Pty Ltd
(AG2014/8151)
CROWN EQUIPMENT PTY LTD QUEENSLAND SERVICE DEPARTMENT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER BLAIR | MELBOURNE, 2 DECEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Crown Equipment Pty Ltd Queensland Service Department Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] This is an application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement, the Crown Equipment Pty Ltd Queensland Service Department Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement), made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Crown Equipment Pty Ltd. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[2] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), being the bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[3] Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, the Applicant has given the undertaking annexed to this decision and to the Agreement. In accordance with ss. 191(1) and 201(3) of the Act I note that the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 9 December 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2017.
ANNEXURE A
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE411316 PR558090>
- AGLC
- Crown Equipment Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 8361
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 8361
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval, including the better off overall test. This required the court to examine the terms of the agreement and determine whether employees covered by the agreement were better off overall, taking into account both the financial and non-financial benefits and detriments, compared to the applicable award or safety net. The court also had to consider whether the agreement complied with other relevant statutory requirements, such as the "no disadvantage test" under section 232 of the Act.
The court found that the agreement met the better off overall test and complied with other relevant statutory requirements. The court rejected the unions' arguments that the agreement did not meet the statutory requirements, finding that the evidence showed that employees were better off overall under the agreement. The court also found that the agreement complied with other relevant statutory requirements, including the no disadvantage test. The court approved the agreement and made an order accordingly.
The court made an order approving the Queensland Service Department Enterprise Agreement 2014, subject to certain conditions and modifications. The order came into effect on the date of the order. The applicant was required to provide a copy of the approved agreement to the unions and to the Fair Work Ombudsman. The unions were required to inform their members of the approved agreement and to take such steps as were necessary to give effect to the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.