Crisafio v Cornerstone Holdings Pty Ltd

Case [2016] FWC 1424


[2016] FWC 1424

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.365—General protections
Mary Crisafio
v

Cornerstone Holdings Pty Ltd T/A Cornerstone Cartage Contractors

(C2015/8307)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE SYDNEY, 3 MARCH 2016
Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal.

[1] An application pursuant to s.365 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) was made by

Ms Mary Crisafio (the Applicant) alleging she was dismissed by Cornerstone Holdings Pty

Ltd T/A Cornerstone Cartage Contractors (the Respondent) in contravention of Part 3-1 of the

Act.

[2]        On 2 March 2016, I issued a certificate pursuant to s.368 of the Act certifying that the

Fair Work Commission (the Commission) is satisfied that all reasonable attempts to resolve

the dispute have been, or are likely to be, unsuccessful.

[3]        I am now aware that the Respondent alleges that the application was not lodged within

21 days after the dismissal took effect.

[4] Before it deals with a dispute lodged pursuant to s.365 of the Act the Commission

must be satisfied that it has been lodged in time or allow a further period pursuant to s.366(2).

[5]        It is appropriate, in the interest of fairness and efficiency, to revoke the certificate to

allow the issues pursuant to s.366 of the Act to be determined.

[6]        Accordingly, pursuant to s.603 of the Act, I hereby revoke, on my own initiative, the

certificate, pursuant to s.368 of the Act, issued on 2 March 2016.

[7]        The matter will now be programmed as part of the jurisdictional roster.

[2016] FWC 1424

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR577677>

Details
AGLC
Crisafio v Cornerstone Holdings Pty Ltd [2016] FWC 1424
Case
[2016] FWC 1424
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Crisafio v Cornerstone Holdings Pty Ltd involved an application by Ms Mary Crisafio against Cornerstone Holdings Pty Ltd T/A Cornerstone Cartage Contractors, under section 365 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Ms Crisafio alleged that she was dismissed by the Respondent in contravention of Part 3-1 of the Act. The matter was heard by Deputy President Lawrence in Sydney on 3 March 2016.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the application by Ms Crisafio had been lodged within the required 21-day period following her dismissal. The Fair Work Commission must be satisfied that a section 365 application is lodged in time, or alternatively, allow a further period for lodging the application under section 366(2). The Respondent argued that the application was not lodged within the 21-day period. The Deputy President determined that it was appropriate, in the interest of fairness and efficiency, to revoke the certificate and allow the jurisdictional issues to be determined.

In light of the above, the Deputy President revoked the certificate issued on 2 March 2016, pursuant to section 603 of the Act. The matter will now be programmed as part of the jurisdictional roster, allowing the jurisdictional issues to be addressed. This decision ensures that the appropriate procedural steps are followed, and the application will be assessed in accordance with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.