[2016] FWC 1424
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
| s.365—General protections |
| Mary Crisafio |
| v |
Cornerstone Holdings Pty Ltd T/A Cornerstone Cartage Contractors
(C2015/8307)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE | SYDNEY, 3 MARCH 2016 |
| Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal. |
[1] An application pursuant to s.365 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) was made by
Ms Mary Crisafio (the Applicant) alleging she was dismissed by Cornerstone Holdings Pty
Ltd T/A Cornerstone Cartage Contractors (the Respondent) in contravention of Part 3-1 of the
Act.
[2] On 2 March 2016, I issued a certificate pursuant to s.368 of the Act certifying that the
Fair Work Commission (the Commission) is satisfied that all reasonable attempts to resolve
the dispute have been, or are likely to be, unsuccessful.
[3] I am now aware that the Respondent alleges that the application was not lodged within
21 days after the dismissal took effect.
[4] Before it deals with a dispute lodged pursuant to s.365 of the Act the Commission
must be satisfied that it has been lodged in time or allow a further period pursuant to s.366(2).
[5] It is appropriate, in the interest of fairness and efficiency, to revoke the certificate to
allow the issues pursuant to s.366 of the Act to be determined.
[6] Accordingly, pursuant to s.603 of the Act, I hereby revoke, on my own initiative, the
certificate, pursuant to s.368 of the Act, issued on 2 March 2016.
[7] The matter will now be programmed as part of the jurisdictional roster.
[2016] FWC 1424
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR577677>
- AGLC
- Crisafio v Cornerstone Holdings Pty Ltd [2016] FWC 1424
- Case
- [2016] FWC 1424
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the application by Ms Crisafio had been lodged within the required 21-day period following her dismissal. The Fair Work Commission must be satisfied that a section 365 application is lodged in time, or alternatively, allow a further period for lodging the application under section 366(2). The Respondent argued that the application was not lodged within the 21-day period. The Deputy President determined that it was appropriate, in the interest of fairness and efficiency, to revoke the certificate and allow the jurisdictional issues to be determined.
In light of the above, the Deputy President revoked the certificate issued on 2 March 2016, pursuant to section 603 of the Act. The matter will now be programmed as part of the jurisdictional roster, allowing the jurisdictional issues to be addressed. This decision ensures that the appropriate procedural steps are followed, and the application will be assessed in accordance with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.