| [2014] FWCA 5528 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Cripps Nubake Pty Ltd
(AG2014/1464)
CRIPPS NUBAKE HOBART SUPERMARKET MERCHANDISERS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Tasmania | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 19 AUGUST 2014 |
Application for approval of the Cripps Nubake Hobart Supermarket Merchandisers Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Cripps Nubake Hobart Supermarket Merchandisers Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Cripps Nubake Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement and will be appended to the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 19 August 2014 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 26 August 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 25 August 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE409595 PR554247>
ANNEXURE A
- AGLC
- Cripps Nubake Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 5528
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 5528
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the enterprise agreement complied with the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Court had to determine whether the agreement was fairly and properly negotiated, whether it contained the appropriate minimum terms and conditions, and whether it complied with the procedural requirements for making an enterprise agreement. The Court also needed to assess whether the agreement met the public interest test, ensuring it would not have a detrimental effect on the broader community.
The Fair Work Commission carefully reviewed the evidence presented by both parties. It found that the agreement had been fairly and properly negotiated, contained the required minimum terms and conditions, and complied with the procedural requirements. Furthermore, the Commission was satisfied that the agreement would not have an adverse effect on the public interest. As a result, the Court approved the Cripps Nubake Hobart Supermarket Merchandisers Enterprise Agreement 2014.
The Fair Work Commission approved the enterprise agreement, and the Court ordered that it be registered with the Fair Work Commission. This registration makes the agreement legally binding on the parties involved, ensuring that the terms and conditions outlined in the agreement are enforced.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.