Criminal Practice Amendment Rule (No. 1) 2003 (Qld)

Case
No judgment structure available for this case.

Criminal Practice Amendment Rule (No. 1) 2003
Queensland Subordinate Legislation 2003 No. 42 Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 CRIMINAL PRACTICE AMENDMENT RULE (No. 1) 2003 TABLE OF PROVISIONS Section Page 1 Short title . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2 Rule amended . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 Amendment of sch 3 (Forms for indictments, informations and complaints—statement of offences under the Code) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
r1 2 r3 Criminal Practice Amendment Rule (No. 1) 2003 No. 42, 2003 1 Short title This rule may be cited as the Criminal Practice Amendment Rule (No. 1) 2003 . 2 Rule amended This rule amends the Criminal Practice Rules 1999. 3 Amendment of sch 3 (Forms for indictments, informations and complaints—statement of offences under the Code) (1) Schedule 3, chapter 16— insert— Form 74A—Retaliation against a (family member of a) judicial officer ( or juror or witness) (Section 119B. Retaliation against judicial officer, juror, witness or family) 1. Caused (or threatened to cause) an injury or detriment to EF, a judicial officer ( or MN, a member of the family of EF, a judicial officer), without reasonable cause, in retaliation because EF as a judicial officer [ describe the thing done ]. 2. Caused (or threatened to cause) an injury or detriment to EF, a juror ( or MN, a member of the family of EF, a juror), without reasonable cause, in retaliation because EF as a juror in [ state the judicial proceeding ] [ describe the thing done ]. 3. Caused (or threatened to cause) an injury or detriment to EF, a witness ( or MN, a member of the family of EF, a witness), without reasonable cause, in retaliation because EF as a witness in [ state the judicial proceeding ] [ describe the thing done ].’. (2) Schedule 3, form 75, item 1, ‘Being the holder of a judicial office, namely [ describe it ], corruptly’— omit, insert— ‘Corruptly’. (3) Schedule 3, form 75, items 2 and 3, ‘the holder of a judicial office’— omit, insert—
r3 3 r3 Criminal Practice Amendment Rule (No. 1) 2003 No. 42, 2003 ‘a judicial officer’. (4) Schedule 3, form 77— omit, insert— Form 77—Corruption of a juror (Section 122. Corruption of jurors) 1. Attempted by threat ( or by intimidation or by [ describe the benefit or promise, or other corrupt means ]) to influence EF, a juror ( or a person to be sworn as a juror) in EF’s conduct as a juror, in [ state the judicial proceeding ]. 2. Accepted [ describe the benefit or promise ] on account of his ( or her) capacity as a juror ( or a person to be sworn as a juror) [ describe thing done or to be done ] in [ state the judicial proceeding ].’. (5) Schedule 3, form 213, ‘ an animal ’— omit, insert— stock ’. (6) Schedule 3, form 213, ‘ see s.398(2) ’— omit, insert— see s.1, definition “stock” and s.398(2) . (7) Schedule 3, form 225, ‘ of value exceeding omit, insert— valued at more than ’. (8) Schedule 3, form 225, ‘exceeded’— omit, insert— ‘was more than’. (9) Schedule 3, form 279, ‘ an animal ’— omit, insert— stock ’. (10) Schedule 3, form 279, ‘ cattle ’— omit, insert— stock ’.
r3 4 r3 Criminal Practice Amendment Rule (No. 1) 2003 No. 42, 2003 (11) Schedule 3, form 280, ‘ a stolen animal ’— omit, insert— stolen stock ’. (12) Schedule 3, form 280, ‘ cattle ’— omit, insert— stock ’. (13) Schedule 3, form 283, ‘ an animal ’— omit, insert— stock ’. ENDNOTES 1. Made by the Attorney-General on 20 March 2003. 2. Notified in the gazette on 21 March 2003. 3. Laid before the Legislative Assembly on . . . 4. The administering agency is the Department of Justice and Attorney-General. © State of Queensland 2003
Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0