Criminal Law Amendment Act (No. 1) 1998 (WA)

Case
No judgment structure available for this case.

WESTERN AUSTRALIA

CRIMINAL LAW AMENDMENT

ACT (No. 1) 1998

No. 38 of 1998

AN ACT to amend —

The Criminal Code; and

the Sentencing Act 1995;

and to amend various other Acts as a consequence.

[Assented to 25 September 1998.]

The Parliament of Western Australia enacts as follows:

No. 38]

Criminal Law Amendment Act (No. 1) 1998

s. 1

PART 1 — PRELIMINARY

Short title

1. This Act may be cited as the Criminal Law Amendment

Act (No. 1) 1998.

Criminal Law Amendment Act (No. 1) 1998

[No. 38

s. 2

PART 2 — THE CRIMINAL CODE

The Code

2.   In this Part ‘‘the Code’’ means The Criminal Code*.

[* Reprinted as at 21 April 1997 as the Schedule to the

Criminal Code Act 1913 appearing in Appendix B to

the Criminal Code Compilation Act 1913.

For subsequent amendments see Act No. 19 of 1997.]

Section 236 amended

3. (1) The second paragraph of section 236 of the Code is amended by deleting ‘‘his aid and under his direction,’’ and substituting —

‘‘

aid of, and under the direction of, the medical

practitioner,

’’.

After the second paragraph of section 236 of the Code the following paragraphs are inserted —

(2)

‘‘

When a person is in lawful custody upon a charge of committing any offence of such a nature and alleged to have been committed under such circumstances that there are reasonable grounds for believing that a sample of the person’s blood, hair (from any part of the body), nails or saliva, or of any matter on the person’s body or obtainable by a buccal swab, will afford evidence as to the commission of the offence, it is lawful for —

(a)

a legally qualified medical practitioner; or

(b)

a nurse as defined in the Nurses Act 1992,

No. 38]

Criminal Law Amendment Act (No. 1) 1998

s. 4

acting at the request of a police officer, and for any person acting in good faith in aid of, and under the direction of, the person acting at the request of the police officer, to take the sample from the person so in custody and to use such force as is reasonably necessary for that purpose.

Where —

(a)

apersonisfoundnotguiltyofanoffencein respect of which a sample has been taken under this section; and

(b)

thepersonrequeststhatthesampleandany genetic information arising from the taking of the sample be destroyed,

the sample and any genetic information arising from the taking of the sample is to be destroyed in his presence after the time for an appeal from the finding has expired or an appeal from the finding has been resolved in his favour.

’’.

Chapter XXXIIIB repealed and a Chapter substituted and consequential amendments

4. (1) Chapter XXXIIIB of the Code is repealed and the

following Chapter is substituted —

‘‘

CHAPTER XXXIIIB — STALKING

Interpretation

338D. (1) In this chapter —

‘ ‘circumstances of aggravation’’ means circumstances in which —

(a)

immediatelybeforeorduringor immediately after the commission of the

Criminal Law Amendment Act (No. 1) 1998

[No. 38

s. 4

offence, the offender is armed with any dangerous or offensive weapon or instrument or pretends to be so armed; or

(b)

the conduct of the offender in committing the offence constituted a breach of —

(i)

an order made or registered under the Restraining Orders Act 1997 or to which that Act applies; or

(ii)

aconditiononwhichbailhasbeen granted to the offender;

‘‘intimidate’’, in relation to a person, includes —

(a)

tocausephysicalormentalharmtothe person;

(b)

to cause apprehension or fear in the person;

(c)

to prevent the person from doing an act that the person is lawfully entitled to do, or to hinder the person in doing such an act;

(d)

to compel the person to do an act that the person is lawfully entitled to abstain from doing;

‘‘pursue’’, in relation to a person, includes —

(a)

to repeatedly communicate with the person, whether directly or indirectly and whether in words or otherwise;

(b)

to repeatedly follow the person;

No. 38]

Criminal Law Amendment Act (No. 1) 1998

s. 4

(c)

to repeatedly cause the person to receive unsolicited items;

(d)

towatchorbesettheplacewherethe person lives or works or happens to be, or the approaches to such a place;

(e)

whether or not repeatedly, to do any of the foregoing in breach of a restraining order or bail condition.

(2) For the purpose of deciding whether an accused

person has pursued another person —

(a)

theaccusedisnottoberegardedashaving communicated with or followed that person on a particular occasion if it is proved by or on behalf of the accused that on that occasion the accused did not intend to communicate with or follow that person;

(b)

an act by the accused on a particular occasion is not to be taken into account for the purpose of deciding whether the accused watched or beset a place where that person lived, worked or happened to be, or the approaches to such a place, if it is proved by or on behalf of the accused that on that occasion the accused did not know it was such a place.

Stalking

338E. (1) A person who pursues another person with intent to intimidate that person or a third person, is guilty of a crime and is liable —

(a)

where the offence is committed in circumstances of aggravation, to imprisonment for 8 years; and

Criminal Law Amendment Act (No. 1) 1998

[No. 38

s. 4

(b)

in any other case, to imprisonment for 3 years.

Summary conviction penalty:

(c)

inacasetowhichparagraph(a)applies: Imprisonment for 2 years or a fine of $8 000;

(d)

inacasetowhichparagraph(b)applies: Imprisonment for 18 months or a fine of $6 000.

A person who pursues another person in a manner that could reasonably be expected to intimidate, and that does in fact intimidate, that person or a third person is guilty of a simple offence.

(2)

Penalty: Imprisonment for 12 months or a fine of

$4 000.

(3) It is a defence to a charge under this section to

prove that the accused person acted with lawful authority.

’’.

Schedule 2 to the Bail Act 1982 is amended in item 1 by

deleting the entry relating to section 338D of the The Criminal

Code and substituting the following —

(2)

‘‘ s. 338E

Stalking ’’.

(3) Schedule 1 to the Criminal Law (Mentally Impaired Defendants) Act 1996 is amended in item 1 by deleting the entry relating to section 338D (1) (d) of The Criminal Code and substituting the following —

‘‘

s. 388E (1) (a)

Stalking committed in circumstances of

aggravation

’’.

No. 38]

Criminal Law Amendment Act (No. 1) 1998

s. 5

Section 598AA inserted

5. After section 598A of the Code the following section is

inserted —

‘‘

Stalking; alternative verdict

598AA. (1) Upon an indictment charging a person with an offence under section 338E (1) the person may be convicted of a simple offence under section 338E (2).

Where a charge under section 338E (1) is dealt with

summarily the person charged may be convicted summarily

of an offence under section 338E (2).

(2)

’’.

Criminal Law Amendment Act (No. 1) 1998

[No. 38

s. 6

PART 3 — SENTENCING ACT 1995

Section 91 amended

6. Section 91 (3) of the Sentencing Act 1995* is repealed and the following subsections are substituted —

‘‘

A court that sentences an offender to strict security life imprisonment must order that the offender be imprisoned for the whole of the offender’s life if it is necessary to do so in order to meet the community’s interest in punishment and deterrence.

(3)

In determining whether an offence is one for which an order under subsection (3) is necessary, the only matters relating to the offence that are to be taken into account are —

(4)

(a)

thecircumstancesofthecommissionofthe offence; and

(b)

any aggravating factors.

’’.

[* Act No. 77 of 1995.]

______________

By Authority: JOHN A. STRIJK, Government Printer

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0