Criminal Code 2002 (ACT)
Criminal Code 2002
A2002-51
Republication No 57
Effective: 16 November 2025
Republication date: 16 November 2025
Last amendment made by A2025‑29
About this republication
The republished law
This is a republication of the Criminal Code 2002 (including any amendment made under the Legislation Act 2001, part 11.3 (Editorial changes)) as in force on 16 November 2025. It also includes any commencement, amendment, repeal or expiry affecting this republished law to 16 November 2025.
The legislation history and amendment history of the republished law are set out in endnotes 3 and 4.
Kinds of republications
The Parliamentary Counsel’s Office prepares 2 kinds of republications of ACT laws (see the ACT legislation register at type="disc">
authorised republications to which the Legislation Act 2001 applies
unauthorised republications.
The status of this republication appears on the bottom of each page.
Editorial changes
The Legislation Act 2001, part 11.3 authorises the Parliamentary Counsel to make editorial amendments and other changes of a formal nature when preparing a law for republication. Editorial changes do not change the effect of the law, but have effect as if they had been made by an Act commencing on the republication date (see Legislation Act 2001, s 115 and s 117). The changes are made if the Parliamentary Counsel considers they are desirable to bring the law into line, or more closely into line, with current legislative drafting practice.
This republication does not include amendments made under part 11.3 (see endnote 1).
Uncommenced provisions and amendments
If a provision of the republished law has not commenced, the symbol U appears immediately before the provision heading. Any uncommenced amendments that affect this republished law are accessible on the ACT legislation register ( For more information, see the home page for this law on the register.
Modifications
If a provision of the republished law is affected by a current modification, the symbol M appears immediately before the provision heading. The text of the modifying provision appears in the endnotes. For the legal status of modifications, see the Legislation Act 2001, section 95.
Penalties
At the republication date, the value of a penalty unit for an offence against this law is $160 for an individual and $810 for a corporation (see Legislation Act 2001, s 133).
Criminal Code 2002
Contents
Page
Chapter 1 Preliminary
1 Name of Act 2
3 Dictionary 2
4 Notes 2
5 Codification 2
Chapter 2 General principles of criminal responsibility
Part 2.1 Purpose and application—ch 2
6 Purpose—ch 2 3
7 Application—ch 2 3
8 Delayed application of ch 2 to certain offences 3
10 Definitions—applied provisions and application date 4
Part 2.2 The elements of an offence
Division 2.2.1 General—pt 2.2
11 Elements 5
12 Establishing guilt of offences 5
Division 2.2.2 Physical elements
13 Definitions—conduct and engage in conduct 6
14 Physical elements 6
15 Voluntariness 6
16 Omissions 7
Division 2.2.3 Fault elements
17 Fault elements 7
18 Intention 7
19 Knowledge 8
20 Recklessness 8
21 Negligence 9
22 Offences that do not provide fault elements 9
Division 2.2.4 Cases where fault elements are not required
23 Strict liability 9
24 Absolute liability 10
Part 2.3 Circumstances where there is no criminal responsibility
Division 2.3.1 Lack of capacity—children
25 Children under 14—criminal responsibility 11
26 Children 12 and over but under 14—knowledge that conduct wrong 11
Division 2.3.2 Lack of capacity—mental impairment
27 Definition—mental impairment 12
28 Mental impairment and criminal responsibility 12
29 Mental impairment and other defences 13
Division 2.3.3 Intoxication
30 Intoxication—interpretation 13
31 Intoxication—offences involving basic intent 14
32 Intoxication—negligence as fault element 15
33 Intoxication—relevance to defences 15
34 Involuntary intoxication 16
Division 2.3.4 Mistake and ignorance
35 Mistake or ignorance of fact—fault elements other than negligence 16
36 Mistake of fact—strict liability 17
38 Claim of right 17
Division 2.3.5 External factors
39 Intervening conduct or event 18
40 Duress 18
41 Sudden or extraordinary emergency 19
42 Self-defence 19
43 Lawful authority 20
Division 2.3.6 Lawful purpose
43A Lawful possession 20
Part 2.4 Extensions of criminal responsibility
44 Attempt 22
45 Complicity and common purpose 23
45A Joint commission 24
46 Commission by proxy 26
47 Incitement 27
48 Conspiracy 28
Part 2.5 Corporate criminal responsibility
49 General principles 31
50 Physical elements 31
51 Corporation—fault elements other than negligence 31
52 Corporation—negligence 33
53 Corporation—mistake of fact—strict liability 33
54 Corporation—intervening conduct or event 34
55 Evidence of negligence or failure to exercise appropriate diligence 34
Part 2.6 Proof of criminal responsibility
56 Legal burden of proof—prosecution 35
57 Standard of proof—prosecution 35
58 Evidential burden of proof—defence 35
59 Legal burden of proof—defence 37
60 Standard of proof—defence 37
61 Use of averments 38
Part 2.7 Geographical application
62 Application and effect—pt 2.7 39
63 Interpretation—pt 2.7 39
64 Extension of offences if required geographical nexus exists 40
65 Geographical application—double criminality 40
66 Geographical application—procedure 40
67 Geographical application—suspicion etc that offence committed 42
Chapter 3 Theft, fraud, bribery and related offences
Part 3.1 Interpretation for ch 3
300 Definitions—ch 3 43
301 Person to whom property belongs for ch 3 46
302 Dishonesty a matter for trier of fact 46
Part 3.2 Theft and related offences
Division 3.2.1 Interpretation for pt 3.2
303 Dishonesty for pt 3.2 47
304 Appropriation of property for pt 3.2 47
305 Person to whom property belongs for pt 3.2 48
306 Intention of permanently depriving for pt 3.2 49
307 General deficiency 50
Division 3.2.2 Indictable offences for pt 3.2
308 Theft 50
309 Robbery 50
310 Aggravated robbery 51
311 Burglary 51
312 Aggravated burglary 52
313 Receiving 52
314 Receiving—meaning of stolen property 53
315 Going equipped for theft etc 54
316 Going equipped with offensive weapon for theft etc 54
318 Taking etc motor vehicle without consent 55
Division 3.2.3 Summary offences for pt 3.2
319 Dishonestly taking territory property 56
320 Dishonestly retaining territory property 57
321 Minor theft 58
322 Removal of articles on public exhibition 58
322A Making off without payment 59
323 Making off without payment—minor offence 59
324 Unlawful possession of stolen property 60
Part 3.3 Fraudulent conduct
Division 3.3.1 Interpretation for pt 3.3
325 Definitions—pt 3.3 62
Division 3.3.2 Obtaining property by deception
326 Obtaining property by deception 62
327 Dishonesty for div 3.3.2 62
328 Meaning of obtains for div 3.3.2 63
329 Intention of permanently depriving—div 3.3.2 63
330 Money transfers 64
331 General deficiency for div 3.3.2 65
Division 3.3.3 Other indictable offences for pt 3.3
332 Obtaining financial advantage by deception 65
333 General dishonesty 65
334 Conspiracy to defraud 67
Division 3.3.4 Summary offences for pt 3.3
335 Obtaining financial advantage from the Territory 69
336 Passing valueless cheques 70
Part 3.4 False or misleading statements, information and documents
336A Making false statements on oath or in statutory declarations 72
337 Making false or misleading statements 72
338 Giving false or misleading information 74
339 Producing false or misleading documents 76
Part 3.5 Blackmail
340 Meaning of menace for pt 3.5 77
341 Meaning of unwarranted demand with a menace for pt 3.5 77
342 Blackmail 78
Part 3.6 Forgery and related offences
Division 3.6.1 Interpretation for pt 3.6
343 Definitions—pt 3.6 79
344 Meaning of false document etc for pt 3.6 79
345 Inducing acceptance that document genuine 80
Division 3.6.2 Offences for pt 3.6
346 Forgery 81
347 Using false document 81
348 Possessing false document 82
349 Making or possessing device etc for making false document 82
350 False accounting 83
351 False statement by officer of body 85
Part 3.7 Bribery and related offences
Division 3.7.1 Interpretation for pt 3.7
352 Definitions—pt 3.7 86
353 Meaning of agent and principal for pt 3.7 86
354 Dishonesty for pt 3.7 87
355 Meaning of obtain for pt 3.7 87
Division 3.7.2 Offences for pt 3.7
356 Bribery 87
357 Other corrupting benefits 89
358 Payola 90
359 Abuse of public office 90
Part 3.8 Impersonation or obstruction of territory public officials
360 Impersonating territory public official 93
361 Obstructing territory public official 94
362 Impersonating police officer 95
363 Obstructing territory public official—minor offence 96
Part 3.8A Cheating at gambling
Division 3.8A.1 Interpretation—pt 3.8A
363A Definitions—pt 3.8A 97
363B Meaning of cause—pt 3.8A 98
363C Meaning of corrupts a betting outcome—pt 3.8A 98
363D Meaning of obtain—pt 3.8A 98
363E Proof of certain matters not required for offences against part 3.8A 98
Division 3.8A.2 Offences—pt 3.8A
363F Conduct that corrupts betting outcome 99
363G Bet with information about corrupt betting outcome 100
363H Bet with inside information 101
Part 3.9 Procedural matters for ch 3
Division 3.9.1 General—pt 3.9
364 Stolen property held by dealers etc—owners rights 103
365 Stolen property held by police—disposal 104
366 Procedure and evidence—theft, receiving etc 104
367 Certain proceedings not to be heard together 107
368 Indictment for offence relating to deeds, money etc 107
369 Theft of motor vehicle—cancellation of licence 108
Division 3.9.2 Alternative verdicts—ch 3
369A Alternative verdicts—aggravated robbery and robbery 108
369B Alternative verdicts—aggravated burglary and burglary 109
370 Alternative verdicts—theft and taking motor vehicle without consent 109
371 Alternative verdicts—theft or obtaining property by deception and receiving 109
372 Alternative verdicts—theft and obtaining property by deception 110
373 Verdict of ‘theft or receiving’ etc 111
374 Alternative verdicts—making false or misleading statements 111
Division 3.9.3 Forfeiture—ch 3
375 Going equipped offences—forfeiture 112
376 Unlawful possession offence—forfeiture 112
377 Unlawful possession offence—disposal of forfeited property by public trustee and guardian 113
378 Unlawful possession offence—return of or compensation for forfeited property 114
379 Forgery offences—forfeiture 114
Chapter 4 Property damage and computer offences
Part 4.1 Property damage offences
Division 4.1.1 Interpretation for pt 4.1
400 Definitions—pt 4.1 115
401 Person to whom property belongs 116
402 Meaning of threat for pt 4.1 116
Division 4.1.2 Offences—pt 4.1
403 Damaging property 116
404 Arson 117
405 Causing bushfires 118
406 Threat to cause property damage—fear of death or serious harm 118
407 Threat to cause property damage 119
408 Possession of thing with intent to damage property 119
Division 4.1.3 Defences—pt 4.1
409 Consent—pt 4.1 offences 120
410 Claim of right—pt 4.1 offences 120
411 Self-defence 121
Part 4.2 Computer offences
412 Definitions—pt 4.2 122
413 Limited meaning of access to data etc 123
414 Meaning of unauthorised access, modification or impairment 124
415 Unauthorised access, modification or impairment with intent to commit serious offence 124
416 Unauthorised modification of data to cause impairment 125
417 Unauthorised impairment of electronic communication 126
418 Possession of data with intent to commit serious computer offence 127
419 Producing, supplying or obtaining data with intent to commit serious computer offence 128
420 Unauthorised access to or modification of restricted data held in computer 128
421 Unauthorised impairment of data held in computer disc, credit card etc 129
Part 4.3 Sabotage
422 Definitions—pt 4.3 130
423 Sabotage 131
424 Threaten sabotage 132
Chapter 6 Serious drug offences
Part 6.1 Interpretation for ch 6
600 Definitions—ch 6 133
601 Meaning of trafficable quantity, commercial quantity and large commercial quantity 135
Part 6.2 Trafficking in controlled drugs
602 Meaning of trafficking 137
603 Trafficking in controlled drug 137
604 Trafficking offence—presumption if trafficable quantity possessed etc 138
605 Complicity, incitement and conspiracy offences do not apply to buyers of drugs 139
Part 6.3 Manufacturing controlled drugs and precursors
606 Meaning of manufacture 140
607 Manufacturing controlled drug for selling 140
608 Manufacturing offence—presumption if trafficable quantity manufactured 141
609 Manufacturing controlled drug 141
610 Selling controlled precursor for manufacture of controlled drug 142
611 Manufacturing controlled precursor for manufacture of controlled drug 142
612 Possessing controlled precursor 145
612A Possessing offence—presumption if controlled precursor possessed to manufacture controlled drug 146
613 Supplying substance, equipment or instructions for manufacturing controlled drug 146
614 Possessing substance, equipment or instructions for manufacturing controlled drug 147
614A Possessing tablet press 148
Part 6.4 Cultivating controlled plants
615 Meaning of cultivate 149
616 Cultivating controlled plant for selling 149
617 Cultivating offence—presumption if trafficable quantity cultivated 151
618 Cultivating controlled plant 151
619 Selling controlled plant 152
620 Supplying plant material, equipment or instructions for cultivating controlled plant 153
621 Possessing plant material, equipment or instructions for cultivating controlled plant 154
Part 6.4A Display of drug pipes
621A Display of drug pipes 155
Part 6.5 Drug offences involving children
622 Supplying controlled drug to child for selling 156
623 Supplying offence—presumption if trafficable quantity supplied etc 157
624 Procuring child to traffic in controlled drug 158
625 Supplying controlled drug to child 159
626 Children not criminally responsible for offences against pt 6.5 160
Part 6.6 General provisions for drug offences
627 Application—pt 6.6 161
628 Carrying on business of trafficking 161
629 Single offence for trafficking etc on different occasions 163
630 Single offence for different parcels trafficked etc on the same occasion 163
631 Single offence—working out quantities if different kinds of controlled drug etc involved 165
632 Knowledge or recklessness about identity of controlled drugs, plants and precursors 167
633 Alternative verdicts—mistaken belief about identity of controlled drug, precursor or plant 167
634 Alternative verdicts—mistaken belief about quantity of controlled drug, precursor or plant 168
635 Alternative verdicts—different quantities 169
636 Alternative verdicts—trafficking and obtaining property by deception 169
636A Alternative verdicts—trafficking in or possessing controlled drug 170
Part 6.7 Offences relating to property derived from drug offences
637 Meaning of drug offence 171
638 Property directly or indirectly derived from drug offence 171
639 Concealing etc property derived from drug offence 172
640 Receiving property directly derived from drug offence 173
Chapter 6AParticipation in criminal groups
650 Meaning of criminal activity—ch 6A 174
651 Meaning of criminal group—ch 6A 174
652 Participating in a criminal group 175
653 Participating in a criminal group—causing harm 175
654 Participating in a criminal group—property damage 176
655 Recruiting people to engage in criminal activity 177
Chapter 7 Administration of justice offences
Part 7.1 Interpretation for ch 7
700 Definitions—ch 7 179
701 Meaning of legal proceeding for ch 7 180
Part 7.2 Indictable offences for ch 7
Division 7.2.1 Perjury
702 Aggravated perjury 182
703 Perjury 183
704 Additional provisions about perjury or aggravated perjury 184
Division 7.2.2 Falsifying, destroying or concealing evidence
705 Making or using false evidence 186
706 Destroying or concealing evidence 187
Division 7.2.3 Protection of people involved in legal proceedings
707 Corruption in relation to legal proceedings 188
708 Deceiving witness, interpreter, intermediary or juror 190
709 Threatening etc witness, interpreter, intermediary or juror 190
709A Threatening etc participant in criminal investigation 191
710 Preventing attendance etc of witness, interpreter, intermediary or juror 191
711 Preventing production of thing in evidence 192
712 Reprisal against person involved in proceeding 192
712A Publishing identifying information about childrens proceedings 193
Division 7.2.4 Perverting the course of justice and related offences
713 Perverting the course of justice 196
714 Publication that could cause miscarriage of justice 196
715 False accusation of offence 197
716 Compounding of offence 198
717 Accessory after the fact 199
Part 7.3 Summary offences for ch 7
718 Pleading guilty in another’s name 202
719 Failing to attend 202
720 Failing to produce document or other thing 202
721 Failing to take oath 203
722 Failing to answer question or give information 203
723 Making etc false or misleading statements in legal proceeding 204
724 Obstructing etc legal proceeding 206
725 Obstructing or hindering investigation 206
Part 7.4 Procedural matters for ch 7
726 Consent required for certain prosecutions 207
727 Alternative verdicts—aggravated perjury and perjury 207
728 Alternative verdicts—perverting the course of justice and publication that could cause miscarriage of justice 208
Chapter 7AOther offences
Part 7A.1 Serious vilification
750 Serious vilification 209
Part 7A.2 Public display of Nazi symbols
751 Meaning of Nazi symbol—pt 7A.2 211
752 Public display of Nazi symbols 211
753 Direction to remove Nazi symbol from public display 213
Part 7A.3 Other offences
754 Unauthorised entry of motor vehicle 215
Chapter 8 Miscellaneous
800 Regulation-making power 216
801 Review of amendments made by Justice (Age of Criminal Responsibility) Legislation Amendment Act 2023 216
Schedule 1Crimes Act 1900—Offences for which children 12 years old and older but under 14 years old are criminally responsible 217
Dictionary218
Endnotes
1 About the endnotes 229
2 Abbreviation key 229
3 Legislation history 230
4 Amendment history 238
5 Earlier republications 263
Criminal Code 2002
An Act relating to the criminal law, and for other purposes
Chapter 1Preliminary
Name of Act
This Act is the Criminal Code 2002.
Dictionary
The dictionary at the end of this Act is part of this Act.
Note 1The dictionary at the end of this Act defines certain terms used in this Act, and includes references (signpost definitions) to other terms defined elsewhere in this Act.
For example, the signpost definition ‘conduct—see section 13.’ means that the expression ‘conduct’ is defined in that section.
Note 2A definition in the dictionary (including a signpost definition) applies to the entire Act unless the definition, or another provision of the Act, provides otherwise or the contrary intention otherwise appears (see Legislation Act, s 155 and s 156 (1)).
Notes
A note included in this Act is explanatory and is not part of this Act.
NoteSee the Legislation Act, s 127 (1), (4) and (5) for the legal status of notes.
Codification
(1)The only offences against territory laws are the offences created under this Act or any other Act.
NoteA reference to an Act includes a reference to the statutory instruments made or in force under the Act, including any regulation (see Legislation Act, s 104).
(2)This section does not apply until the application date.
(3)Subsection (2) and this subsection expire on the application date.
Chapter 2General principles of criminal responsibility
Part 2.1Purpose and application—ch 2
Purpose—ch 2
(1)The purpose of this chapter is to codify general principles of criminal responsibility under territory laws.
(2)It contains all the general principles of criminal responsibility that apply to any offence, irrespective of how the offence is created.
Application—ch 2
This chapter applies to all offences against this Act and all other offences against territory laws.
Delayed application of ch 2 to certain offences
(1)Despite section 7, the provisions of this chapter (other than the applied provisions) do not apply to a pre-2003 offence unless—
(a)the offence is omitted and remade (with or without changes); or
(b)an Act or subordinate law expressly provides for the provisions to apply to the offence.
(2)To remove any doubt, a power to make subordinate laws for an Act includes power to make subordinate laws applying this chapter to, or displacing the application of subsection (1) to, offences against subordinate laws under that Act.
(3)In interpreting the applied provisions in relation to an offence, the other provisions of this Act may be considered.
(4)In this section:
omitted and remade—an offence is not omitted and remade if it is amended without being omitted and remade.
pre-2003 offence means an offence in force before 1 January 2003.
(5)This section expires on the application date.
Definitions—applied provisions and application date
(1)In this Act:
application date means a date declared by the Minister.
applied provisions means the following provisions of this chapter:
· section 15 (5) (which deals with evidence of self-induced intoxication)
· division 2.3.1 (Lack of capacity—children)
· division 2.3.2 (Lack of capacity—mental impairment)
· division 2.3.3 (Intoxication)
· part 2.4 (Extensions of criminal responsibility)
· part 2.5 (Corporate criminal responsibility)
· part 2.6 (Proof of criminal responsibility)
· part 2.7 (Geographical application).
NoteDiv 2.3.2 and s 66 (2) (d) became applied provisions on the commencement of the Criminal Code (Mental Impairment) Amendment Act 2006. Pt 2.5 became an applied provision on 9 April 2004. The other applied provisions have been applied provisions since the commencement of the Code on 1 January 2003.
(2)A declaration under subsection (1) is a notifiable instrument.
(3)This section expires on the application date.
Part 2.2The elements of an offence
Division 2.2.1 General—pt 2.2
Elements
(1)An offence consists of physical elements and fault elements.
(2)However, the law that creates the offence may provide that there is no fault element for some or all of the physical elements.
(3)The law that creates the offence may provide different fault elements for different physical elements.
Establishing guilt of offences
(1)A person must not be found guilty of committing an offence unless the following is proved:
(a)the existence of the physical elements that are, under the law creating the offence, relevant to establishing guilt;
(b)for each of the physical elements for which a fault element is required—the fault element or 1 of the fault elements for the physical element.
Note 1See pt 2.6 on proof of criminal responsibility.
Note 2See pt 2.7 on geographical jurisdiction.
(2)However, unless the law creating the offence otherwise expressly provides, a person can be found guilty of committing the offence even though, when carrying out the conduct required for the offence, the person is mistaken about, or ignorant of, the existence or content of a law that creates the offence.
NoteCreate, in relation to an offence, is defined in the dictionary.
Division 2.2.2 Physical elements
Definitions—conduct and engage in conduct
In this Act:
conduct means an act, an omission to do an act or a state of affairs.
NoteSection 363A (Definitions—pt 3.8A) affects the meaning of conduct.
engage in conduct means—
(a)do an act; or
(b)omit to do an act.
Physical elements
A physical element of an offence may be—
(a)conduct; or
(b)a result of conduct; or
(c)a circumstance in which conduct, or a result of conduct, happens.
Voluntariness
(1)Conduct can only be a physical element if it is voluntary.
(2)Conduct is voluntary only if it is a product of the will of the person whose conduct it is.
Examples of conduct that is not voluntary
1 a spasm, convulsion or other unwilled bodily movement
2 an act done during sleep or unconsciousness
3 an act done during impaired consciousness depriving the person of the will to act
(3)An omission to do an act is voluntary only if the act omitted is an act that the person can do.
(4)If the conduct required for an offence consists only of a state of affairs, the state of affairs is voluntary only if it is a state of affairs over which the person is capable of exercising control.
(5)Evidence of self-induced intoxication cannot be considered in deciding whether conduct is voluntary.
NoteFor when intoxication is self-induced, see s 30.
Omissions
An omission to do an act can only be a physical element if—
(a)the law creating the offence makes it a physical element; or
(b)the law creating the offence impliedly provides that the offence is committed by an omission to do an act that there is a duty to do under a territory law or a law of a State or the Commonwealth.
NoteLaw, of the Territory, includes the common law (see Legislation Act, dict, pt 1).
Division 2.2.3 Fault elements
Fault elements
(1)A fault element for a particular physical element may be intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence.
(2)Subsection (1) does not prevent a law that creates an offence from providing other fault elements for a physical element of the offence.
Intention
(1)A person has intention in relation to conduct if the person means to engage in the conduct.
(2)A person has intention in relation to a result if the person means to bring it about or is aware that it will happen in the ordinary course of events.
(3)A person has intention in relation to a circumstance if the person believes that it exists or will exist.
Knowledge
A person has knowledge of a result or circumstance if the person is aware that it exists or will exist in the ordinary course of events.
Recklessness
(1)A person is reckless in relation to a result if—
(a)the person is aware of a substantial risk that the result will happen; and
(b)having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk.
(2)A person is reckless in relation to a circumstance if—
(a)the person is aware of a substantial risk that the circumstance exists or will exist; and
(b)having regard to the circumstances known to the person, it is unjustifiable to take the risk.
(3)The question whether taking a risk is unjustifiable is a question of fact.
(4)If recklessness is a fault element for a physical element of an offence, proof of intention, knowledge or recklessness satisfies the fault element.
Negligence
A person is negligent in relation to a physical element of an offence if the person’s conduct merits criminal punishment for the offence because it involves—
(a)such a great falling short of the standard of care that a reasonable person would exercise in the circumstances; and
(b)such a high risk that the physical element exists or will exist.
Offences that do not provide fault elements
(1)If the law creating an offence does not provide a fault element for a physical element that consists only of conduct, intention is the fault element for the physical element.
(2)If the law creating an offence does not provide a fault element for a physical element that consists of a circumstance or a result, recklessness is the fault element for the physical element.
Division 2.2.4 Cases where fault elements are not required
Strict liability
(1)If a law that creates an offence provides that the offence is a strict liability offence—
(a)there are no fault elements for any of the physical elements of the offence; and
(b)the defence of mistake of fact under section 36 (Mistake of fact—strict liability) is available.
(2)If a law that creates an offence provides that strict liability applies to a particular physical element of the offence—
(a)there are no fault elements for the physical element; and
(b)the defence of mistake of fact under section 36 is available in relation to the physical element.
(3)The existence of strict liability does not make any other defence unavailable.
Absolute liability
(1)If a law that creates an offence provides that the offence is an absolute liability offence—
(a)there are no fault elements for any of the physical elements of the offence; and
(b)the defence of mistake of fact under section 36 (Mistake of fact—strict liability) is not available.
(2)If a law that creates an offence provides that absolute liability applies to a particular physical element of the offence—
(a)there are no fault elements for the physical element; and
(b)the defence of mistake of fact under section 36 is not available in relation to the physical element.
(3)The existence of absolute liability does not make any other defence unavailable.
Part 2.3Circumstances where there is no criminal responsibility
Division 2.3.1 Lack of capacity—children
Children under 14—criminal responsibility
(1)A child under 14 years old is not criminally responsible for an offence.
(2)However, a child who is 12 years old or older, but under 14 years old, can be criminally responsible for an offence mentioned in schedule 1 (a schedule offence) but only if the child knows that their conduct is wrong.
(3)A reference to a schedule offence does not include a reference to—
(a)an offence against part 2.4 (Extensions of criminal responsibility) that relates to the schedule offence other than section 46 (Commission by proxy); or
(b)an offence against section 717 (Accessory after the fact) that relates to the schedule offence.
Children 12 and over but under 14—knowledge that conduct wrong
(1)The question of whether a child who is 12 years old or older, but under 14 years old, knows that their conduct is wrong is a question of fact.
(2)The burden of proving that a child knows that their conduct is wrong is on the prosecution.
Division 2.3.2 Lack of capacity—mental impairment
Definition—mental impairment
(1)In this Act:
mental impairment includes senility, intellectual disability, mental illness, brain damage and severe personality disorder.
(2)In this section:
mental illness is an underlying pathological infirmity of the mind, whether of long or short duration and whether permanent or temporary, but does not include a condition (a reactive condition) resulting from the reaction of a healthy mind to extraordinary external stimuli.
(3)However, a reactive condition may be evidence of a mental illness if it involves some abnormality and is prone to recur.
Mental impairment and criminal responsibility
(1)A person is not criminally responsible for an offence if, when carrying out the conduct required for the offence, the person was suffering from a mental impairment that had the effect that—
(a)the person did not know the nature and quality of the conduct; or
(b)the person did not know that the conduct was wrong; or
(c)the person could not control the conduct.
(2)For subsection (1) (b), a person does not know that conduct is wrong if the person cannot reason with a moderate degree of sense and composure about whether the conduct, as seen by a reasonable person, is wrong.
(3)The question whether a person was suffering from a mental impairment is a question of fact.
(4)A person is presumed not to have been suffering from a mental impairment that had an effect mentioned in subsection (1).
(5)The presumption is displaced only if it is proved on the balance of probabilities (by the prosecution or defence) that the person was suffering from a mental impairment that had an effect mentioned in subsection (1).
(6)The prosecution may rely on this section only if the court gives leave.
(7)If the trier of fact is satisfied that a person is not criminally responsible for an offence only because of mental impairment, it must—
(a)for an offence dealt with before the Supreme Court—return or enter a special verdict that the person is not guilty of the offence because of mental impairment; or
(b)for any other offence—find the person not guilty of the offence because of mental impairment.
Mental impairment and other defences
(1)A person cannot rely on a mental impairment to deny voluntariness or the existence of a fault element, but may rely on mental impairment to deny criminal responsibility.
(2)If the trier of fact is satisfied that a person carried out conduct because of a delusion caused by a mental impairment, the delusion itself cannot be relied on as a defence, but the person may rely on the mental impairment to deny criminal responsibility.
Division 2.3.3 Intoxication
Intoxication—interpretation
(1)In this Act:
fault element of basic intent means a fault element of intention for a physical element that consists only of conduct.
intoxication means intoxication because of the influence of alcohol, a drug or any other substance.
(2)For this Act, intoxication is self-induced unless it came about—
(a)involuntarily; or
(b)because of fraud, sudden or extraordinary emergency, accident, reasonable mistake, duress or force; or
(c)from the use of a drug for which a prescription is required and that was used in accordance with the directions of the doctor or dentist who prescribed it; or
(d)from the use of a drug for which no prescription is required and that was used for a purpose, and in accordance with the dosage level, recommended by the manufacturer.
(3)However, subsection (2) (c) and (d) does not apply if the person using the drug knew, or had reason to believe, when the person took the drug that the drug would significantly impair the person’s judgment or control.
Intoxication—offences involving basic intent
(1)Evidence of self-induced intoxication cannot be considered in deciding whether a fault element of basic intent exists.
NoteA fault element of intention in relation to a result or circumstance is not a fault element of basic intent (see s 30 (1), def fault element of basic intent).
(2)This section does not prevent evidence of self-induced intoxication being considered in deciding whether conduct was accidental.
(3)This section does not prevent evidence of self-induced intoxication being considered in deciding whether a person had a mistaken belief about facts if, when carrying out the conduct making up the physical element of the offence, the person considered whether or not the facts existed.
(4)A person may be taken to have considered whether or not facts existed when carrying out conduct if—
(a)the person had considered, on a previous occasion, whether the facts existed in the circumstances surrounding that occasion; and
(b)the person honestly and reasonably believed that the circumstances surrounding the present occasion were the same, or substantially the same, as the circumstances surrounding the previous occasion.
Intoxication—negligence as fault element
(1)If negligence is a fault element for a particular physical element of an offence, in deciding whether the fault element exists for a person who is intoxicated, regard must be had to the standard of a reasonable person who is not intoxicated.
(2)However, if intoxication is not self-induced, regard must be had to the standard of a reasonable person intoxicated to the same extent as the person concerned.
Intoxication—relevance to defences
(1)If any part of a defence is based on actual knowledge or belief, evidence of intoxication may be considered in deciding whether the knowledge or belief exists.
(2)However, if—
(a)each physical element of an offence has a fault element of basic intent; and
(b)any part of a defence is based on actual knowledge or belief;
evidence of self-induced intoxication cannot be considered in deciding whether the knowledge or belief exists.
(3)If any part of a defence is based on reasonable belief, in deciding whether the reasonable belief exists, regard must be had to the standard of a reasonable person who is not intoxicated.
(4)If a person’s intoxication is not self-induced, in deciding whether any part of a defence based on reasonable belief exists, regard must be had to the standard of a reasonable person intoxicated to the same extent as the person concerned.
Involuntary intoxication
A person is not criminally responsible for an offence if the person’s conduct making up the offence was as a result of intoxication that was not self-induced.
Division 2.3.4 Mistake and ignorance
Mistake or ignorance of fact—fault elements other than negligence
(1)A person is not criminally responsible for an offence that has a physical element for which there is a fault element other than negligence if—
(a)when carrying out the conduct making up the physical element, the person is under a mistaken belief about, or is ignorant of, facts; and
(b)the existence of the mistaken belief or ignorance negates a fault element applying to the physical element.
(2)In deciding whether a person was under a mistaken belief about facts, or was ignorant of facts, the trier of fact may consider whether the mistaken belief or ignorance was reasonable in the circumstances.
Mistake of fact—strict liability
(1)A person is not criminally responsible for an offence that has a physical element for which there is no fault element if—
(a)when carrying out the conduct making up the physical element, the person considered whether or not facts existed, and was under a mistaken but reasonable belief about the facts; and
(b)had the facts existed, the conduct would not have been an offence.
(2)A person may be taken to have considered whether or not facts existed when carrying out conduct if—
(a)the person had considered, on a previous occasion, whether the facts existed in the circumstances surrounding that occasion; and
(b)the person honestly and reasonably believed that the circumstances surrounding the present occasion were the same, or substantially the same, as the circumstances surrounding the previous occasion.
NoteSection 24 (Absolute liability) prevents this section applying to offences of absolute liability.
Claim of right
(1)A person is not criminally responsible for an offence that has a physical element relating to property if—
(a)when carrying out the conduct required for the offence, the person is under a mistaken belief about a proprietary or possessory right; and
(b)the existence of the right would negate a fault element for any physical element of the offence.
(2)A person is not criminally responsible for any other offence arising necessarily out of the exercise of a proprietary or possessory right that the person mistakenly believes to exist.
(3)This section does not negate criminal responsibility for an offence relating to the use of force against a person.
Division 2.3.5 External factors
Intervening conduct or event
A person is not criminally responsible for an offence that has a physical element to which absolute or strict liability applies if—
(a)the physical element is brought about by someone else over whom the person has no control or by a non-human act or event over which the person has no control; and
(b)the person could not reasonably have been expected to guard against the bringing about of the physical element.
Duress
(1)A person is not criminally responsible for an offence if the person carries out the conduct required for the offence under duress.
(2)A person carries out conduct under duress only if the person reasonably believes that—
(a)a threat has been made that will be carried out unless an offence is committed; and
(b)there is no reasonable way to make the threat ineffective; and
(c)the conduct is a reasonable response to the threat.
(3)However, the person does not carry out conduct under duress if the threat is made by or on behalf of a person with whom the person is voluntarily associating to carry out conduct of the kind required for the offence.
Sudden or extraordinary emergency
(1)A person is not criminally responsible for an offence if the person carries out the conduct required for the offence in response to circumstances of sudden or extraordinary emergency.
(2)This section applies only if the person reasonably believes that—
(a)circumstances of sudden or extraordinary emergency exist; and
(b)committing the offence is the only reasonable way to deal with the emergency; and
(c)the conduct is a reasonable response to the emergency.
Self-defence
(1)A person is not criminally responsible for an offence if the person carries out the conduct required for the offence in self-defence.
(2)A person carries out conduct in self-defence only if—
(a)the person believes the conduct is necessary—
(i)to defend himself or herself or someone else; or
(ii)to prevent or end the unlawful imprisonment of himself or herself or someone else; or
(iii)to protect property from unlawful appropriation, destruction, damage or interference; or
(iv)to prevent criminal trespass to land or premises; or
(v)to remove from land or premises a person committing criminal trespass; and
(b)the conduct is a reasonable response in the circumstances as the person perceives them.
(3)However, the person does not carry out conduct in self-defence if—
(a)the person uses force that involves the intentional infliction of death or serious harm—
(i)to protect property; or
(ii)to prevent criminal trespass; or
(iii)to remove a person committing criminal trespass; or
(b)the person is responding to lawful conduct that the person knows is lawful.
(4)Conduct is not lawful for subsection (3) (b) only because the person carrying it out is not criminally responsible for it.
Lawful authority
A person is not criminally responsible for an offence if the conduct required for the offence is justified or excused under a law.
Division 2.3.6 Lawful purpose
43ALawful possession
(1)A person is not criminally responsible for an offence of possessing a particular material or thing if—
(a)the person is—
(i)employed by, or appointed as a member of, a law enforcement or justice agency; or
(ii)required to provide technical, professional or expert services to a law enforcement or justice agency; or
(iii)a legal practitioner, or a person employed by or required to provide technical, professional or expert services to a legal practitioner; and
(b)the possession is—
(i)for a law enforcement purpose; and
(ii)reasonable in the circumstances for that purpose.
(2)Possession of a particular material or thing is for a law enforcement purpose if the possession is necessary for, or of assistance in, any of the following:
(a)enforcing a law of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory;
(b)monitoring compliance with, or investigating a contravention of, a law of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory;
(c)the administration of justice.
Examples—law enforcement purpose
1 police investigation
2 giving legal advice or providing legal representation
3 carrying out analyses or tests for forensic reasons
4 judicial service
(3)In determining a person’s criminal responsibility, the question of whether a person’s possession of a particular material or thing is for a law enforcement purpose is a question of fact.
Part 2.4Extensions of criminal responsibility
Attempt
(1)If a person attempts to commit an offence, the person commits the offence of attempting to commit that offence.
(2)However, a person commits the offence of attempting to commit an offence only if the person carries out conduct that is more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence attempted.
(3)The question whether conduct is more than merely preparatory is a question of fact.
(4)A person may be found guilty of attempting to commit an offence even though—
(a)it was impossible to commit the offence attempted; or
(b)the person committed the offence attempted.
(5)For the offence of attempting to commit an offence, intention and knowledge are fault elements for each physical element of the offence attempted.
NoteOnly 1 of the fault elements of intention or knowledge needs to be established for each physical element of the offence attempted (see s 12 (Establishing guilt of offences)).
(6)However, any special liability provisions that apply to an offence apply also to the offence of attempting to commit the offence.
(7)Any defence, procedure, limitation or qualifying provision applying to an offence applies to the offence of attempting to commit the offence.
(8)If a person is found guilty of attempting to commit an offence, the person cannot later be charged with committing the offence.
(9)The offence of attempting to commit an offence is punishable as if the offence attempted had been committed.
(10)This section does not apply to an offence against section 45 or section 48 (Conspiracy).
Complicity and common purpose
(1)A person is taken to have committed an offence if the person aids, abets, counsels, procures, or is knowingly concerned in or a party to, the commission of the offence by someone else.
(2)However, the person commits the offence because of this section only if—
(a)either—
(i)the person’s conduct in fact aids, abets, counsels, or procures the commission of the offence by the other person; or
(ii)as a result of the person’s conduct, the person in fact is knowingly concerned in or a party to the commission of the offence by the other person; and
(b)when carrying out the conduct, the person either—
(i)intends the conduct to aid, abet, counsel, procure, or result in the person being knowingly concerned in or a party to, the commission of any offence (including its fault elements) of the type committed by the other person; or
(ii)intends the conduct to aid, abet, counsel, procure, or result in the person being knowingly concerned in or a party to, the commission of an offence by the other person and is reckless about the commission of the offence (including its fault elements) in fact committed by the other person.
(3)To remove any doubt, the person is taken to have committed the offence only if the other person commits the offence.
(4)Despite subsection (2), any special liability provisions that apply to an offence apply also to the offence of aiding, abetting, counselling, procuring, or being knowingly concerned in or a party to, the commission of the offence.
(5)A person must not be found guilty of aiding, abetting, counselling, procuring, or being knowingly concerned in or a party to, the commission of an offence if, before the offence was committed, the person—
(a)ended the person’s involvement; and
(b)took all reasonable steps to prevent the commission of the offence.
(6)A person may be found guilty of aiding, abetting, counselling, procuring, or being knowingly concerned in or a party to, the commission of an offence even if the person who committed the offence is not prosecuted or found guilty.
(7)To remove any doubt, if a person is taken to have committed an offence because of this section, the offence is punishable as if, apart from the operation of this section, the person had committed the offence.
(8)If the trier of fact is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that a defendant committed an offence because of this section or otherwise than because of this section but cannot decide which, the trier of fact may nevertheless find the defendant guilty of the offence.
45AJoint commission
(1)A person is taken to have committed an offence if—
(a)the person and at least 1 other person enter into an agreement to commit an offence; and
(b)either—
(i)an offence is committed in accordance with the agreement; or
(ii)an offence is committed in the course of carrying out the agreement.
(2)For subsection (1) (b) (i), an offence is committed in accordance with an agreement if—
(a)the conduct of 1 or more parties in accordance with the agreement makes up the physical elements consisting of conduct of an offence (the joint offence) of the same type as the offence agreed to; and
(b)to the extent that a physical element of the joint offence consists of a result of conduct—the result arises from the conduct engaged in; and
(c)to the extent that a physical element of the joint offence consists of a circumstance—the conduct engaged in, or a result of the conduct engaged in, happens in the circumstance.
(3)For subsection (1) (b) (ii), an offence is committed in the course of carrying out an agreement if a person is reckless about the commission of an offence (the joint offence) that another person in fact commits in the course of carrying out the agreement.
(4)A person commits an offence because of this section only if the person and at least 1 other party to the agreement intend that an offence will be committed under the agreement.
(5)An agreement—
(a)may consist of a non-verbal understanding; and
(b)may be entered into before, or at the same time as, the conduct making up any of the physical elements of the joint offence was engaged in.
(6)A person must not be found guilty of an offence because of this section if, before the conduct making up any of the physical elements of the joint offence concerned was engaged in, the person—
(a)ended the person’s involvement; and
(b)took all reasonable steps to prevent the conduct from being engaged in.
(7)A person may be found guilty of an offence because of this section even if—
(a)another party to the agreement is not prosecuted or found guilty; or
(b)the person was not present when any of the conduct making up the physical elements of the joint offence was engaged in.
(8)Any special liability provisions that apply to the joint offence apply also for the purposes of deciding whether a person commits the offence because of the operation of this section.
(9)To remove any doubt, if a person is taken to have committed an offence because of this section, the offence is punishable as if, apart from the operation of this section, the person had committed the offence.
Commission by proxy
(1)A person is taken to have committed an offence if—
(a)the person procures someone else to engage in conduct that (whether or not together with conduct engaged in by the person) makes up the physical elements of the offence consisting of conduct; and
(b)any physical element of the offence consisting of a circumstance exists; and
(c)any physical element of the offence consisting of a result of the conduct happens; and
(d)when the person procured the other person to engage in the conduct, the person had a fault element applying to each physical element of the offence.
(2)To remove any doubt, if a person is taken to have committed an offence because of this section, the offence is punishable as if, apart from the operation of this section, the person had committed the offence.
Incitement
(1)If a person urges the commission of an offence (the offence incited), the person commits the offence of incitement.
Maximum penalty:
(a)if the offence incited is punishable by life imprisonment—imprisonment for 10 years, 1 000 penalty units or both; or
(b)if the offence incited is punishable by imprisonment for 14 years or more (but not life imprisonment)—imprisonment for 7 years, 700 penalty units or both; or
(c)if the offence incited is punishable by imprisonment for 10 years or more (but less than 14 years)—imprisonment for 5 years, 500 penalty units or both; or
(d)if the offence incited is punishable by imprisonment for less than 10 years, either or both of the following:
(i)the lesser of the maximum term of imprisonment for the offence incited and imprisonment for 3 years;
(ii)300 penalty units; or
(e)if the offence incited is not punishable by imprisonment—the number of penalty units equal to the maximum number of penalty units applying to the offence incited.
(2)A person also commits the offence of incitement if the person urges another person to aid, abet, counsel, procure, be knowingly concerned in or a party to, the commission of an offence (the offence incited) by someone else.
(3)However, the person commits the offence of incitement only if the person intends that the offence incited be committed.
(4)Despite subsection (3), any special liability provisions that apply to an offence apply also to the offence of incitement to commit the offence.
(5)A person may be found guilty of the offence of incitement—
(a)even if it was impossible to commit the offence incited; and
(b)whether or not the offence incited was committed; and
(c)even if the person incited was under the age of criminal responsibility for the offence incited.
(6)Any defence, procedure, limitation or qualifying provision applying to an offence applies to the offence of incitement in relation to the offence.
(7)This section does not apply to an offence against section 44 (Attempt), section 48 (Conspiracy) or this section.
(8)In this section:
under the age of criminal responsibility—a person is under the age of criminal responsibility for an offence if the person is not criminally responsible under section 25 for the offence.
Conspiracy
(1)If a person conspires with someone else to commit an offence (the offence conspired) punishable by imprisonment for longer than 1 year or by a fine of 200 penalty units or more (or both), the person commits the offence of conspiracy.
(2)However, the person commits the offence of conspiracy only if—
(a)the person entered into an agreement with at least 1 other person; and
(b)the person and at least 1 other party to the agreement intend that an offence be committed under the agreement; and
(c)the person or at least 1 other party to the agreement commits an overt act under the agreement.
(3)Despite subsection (2), any special liability provisions that apply to an offence apply also to the offence of conspiracy to commit the offence.
(4)The offence of conspiring to commit an offence is punishable as if the offence conspired had been committed.
(5)A person may be found guilty of the offence of conspiracy even though—
(a)it was impossible to commit the offence conspired; or
(b)the person and each other party to the agreement is a corporation; or
(c)each other party to the agreement is—
(i)a person who is not criminally responsible; or
(ii)a person for whose benefit or protection the offence exists; or
(d)all other parties to the agreement are acquitted of the conspiracy (unless to find the person guilty would be inconsistent with their acquittal).
(6)A person must not be found guilty of the offence of conspiracy to commit an offence if, before the commission of an overt act under the agreement, the person—
(a)withdrew from the agreement; and
(b)took all reasonable steps to prevent the commission of the offence conspired.
(7)A person for whose benefit or protection an offence exists cannot be found guilty of conspiracy to commit the offence.
(8)Any defence, procedure, limitation or qualifying provision applying to an offence applies to the offence of conspiracy to commit the offence.
(9)A court may dismiss a charge of conspiracy if it considers that the interests of justice require it to dismiss the charge.
(10)A proceeding for an offence of conspiracy must not be begun without the consent of the Attorney-General or the director of public prosecutions.
(11)However, a person may be arrested for, charged with, or remanded in custody or on bail in relation to, an offence of conspiracy before the consent has been given.
Part 2.5Corporate criminal responsibility
General principles
(1)This Act applies to corporations as well as individuals.
NoteA law that creates an offence applies to a corporation as well as to an individual (see Legislation Act, s 161).
(2)The Act applies to corporations in the same way as it applies to individuals, but subject to the changes made by this part and any other changes necessary because criminal responsibility is being imposed on a corporation rather than an individual.
Physical elements
A physical element of an offence consisting of conduct is taken to be committed by a corporation if it is committed by an employee, agent or officer of the corporation acting within the actual or apparent scope of his or her employment or within his or her actual or apparent authority.
Earlier republications
Some earlier republications were not numbered. The number in column 1 refers to the publication order.
Since 12 September 2001 every authorised republication has been published in electronic pdf format on the ACT legislation register. A selection of authorised republications have also been published in printed format. These republications are marked with an asterisk (*) in column 1. Electronic and printed versions of an authorised republication are identical.
Republication No and date Effective Last amendment made by Republication for R1
1 Jan 20031 Jan 2003–
1 July 2003not amended new Act R2
31 July 20032 July 2003–
31 Oct 2003not amended commenced provision R3 (RI)
29 July 20251 Nov 2003–
18 Dec 2003A2003‑47 amendments by A2003‑47
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R4 (RI)
29 July 202519 Dec 2003–
8 Apr 2004A2003‑56 amendments by A2003‑56
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R5 (RI)
29 July 20259 Apr 2004
5 Mar 2005A2004‑15 amendments by A2004‑15
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R6 (RI)
29 July 20256 Mar 2005–
22 Nov 2005A2004‑56 amendments by A2004‑56
reissue of printed version for textual correction in s 30 (3)R7 (RI)
29 July 202523 Nov 2005–
6 Apr 2006A2005‑53 amendments by A2005‑53
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R8 (RI)
29 July 20257 Apr 2006–
23 Nov 2006A2006‑14 amendments by A2006‑14
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R9 (RI)
29 July 202524 Nov 2006–
5 Sept 2007A2006‑14 commenced expiry
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R10 (RI)
29 July 20256 Sept 2007–
13 Feb 2009A2007‑22 amendments by A2007‑22
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R11 (RI)
29 July 202514 Feb 2009–
26 Feb 2009A2008‑44 amendments by A2008‑26
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R12 (RI)
29 July 202527 Feb 2009–
29 May 2009A2008‑44 amendments by A2008‑19
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R13 (RI)
29 July 202530 May 2009–
1 June 2009A2008‑44 amendments by A2008‑44
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R14 (RI)
29 July 20252 June 2009–
3 Sept 2009A2008‑44 default application date under s 10 prescribed by SL2009‑25
reissue of printed version for textual correction in s 30 (3)R15 (RI)
29 July 20254 Sept 2009–
6 Mar 2010A2009‑24 amendments by A2009‑24
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R16 (RI)
29 July 20257 Mar 2010–
8 July 2010A2009‑24 commenced expiry
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R17 (RI)
29 July 20259 July 2010–
24 Nov 2010A2010‑25 amendments by A2010‑25
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R18 (RI)
29 July 202525 Nov 2010–
16 Mar 2011A2010‑44 amendments by A2010‑44
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R19 (RI)
29 July 202517 Mar 2011–
30 June 2011A2011‑7 amendments by A2011‑7
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R20 (RI)
29 July 20251 July 2011–
29 Jan 2012A2011‑22 amendments by A2011‑22
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R21 (RI)
29 July 202530 Jan 2012–
29 Feb 2012A2011‑22 amendments by A2010‑15
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R22 (RI)
29 July 20251 Mar 2012–
4 June 2012A2011‑48 amendments by A2011‑48
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R23 (RI)
29 July 20255 June 2012–
23 Apr 2013A2012‑21 amendments by A2012‑21
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R24 (RI)
29 July 202524 Apr 2013–
9 May 2013A2013‑12 amendments by A2013‑12
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R25 (RI)
29 July 202510 May 2013–
13 June 2013A2013‑12 default application date under s 10 prescribed by SL2013‑10
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R26 (RI)
29 July 202514 June 2013–
20 Aug 2013A2013‑19 amendments by A2013‑19
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R27 (RI)
29 July 202521 Aug 2013–
9 Dec 2013A2013‑26 amendments by A2013‑26
reissue of printed version for textual correction in s 30 (3)R28 (RI)
29 July 202510 Dec 2013–
2 Mar 2015A2013-50 amendments by A2013-50
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R29 (RI)
29 July 20253 Mar 2015–
20 Apr 2015A2015-3 amendments by A2015-3
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R30 (RI)
29 July 202521 Apr 2015–
1 June 2015A2015‑10 amendments by A2015‑10
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R31 (RI)
29 July 20252 June 2015–
7 Oct 2015A2015‑10 amendments by A2015‑3
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R32 (RI)
29 July 20258 Oct 2015–
8 Dec 2015A2015‑10 republication for updated endnotes as amended by A2015-38
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R33 (RI)
29 July 20259 Dec 2015–
29 Feb 2015A2015‑50 amendments by A2015‑50
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R34 (RI)
29 July 20251 Mar 2016–
31 Mar 2016A2015‑50 republication for amendments by A2014‑51 and A2015‑38
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R35 (RI)
29 July 20251 April 2016–
23 Aug 2016A2016‑13 amendments by A2016‑13
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R36 (RI)
29 July 202524 Aug 2016‑
2 Apr 2017A2016‑49 amendments by A2016‑49
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R37 (RI)
29 July 20253 Apr 2017‑
5 Apr 2017A2016‑49 amendments by A2016‑49
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R38 (RI)
29 July 20256 Apr 2017‑
30 Apr 2017A2017-9 amendments by A2017-9
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R39 (RI)
29 July 20251 May 2017‑
23 May 2017A2017‑10 amendments by A2016‑42 as amended by A2017‑10
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R40 (RI)
29 July 202524 May 2017‑
14 Aug 2017A2017‑14 amendments by A2017‑14
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R41 (RI)
29 July 202515 Aug 2017–
1 Mar 2018A2017-21 amendments by A2017-21
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R42 (RI)
29 July 20252 Mar 2018–
21 Nov 2018A2018-6 amendments by A2018-6
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R43 (RI)
29 July 202522 Nov 2018–
14 Aug 2019A2018‑42 amendments by A2018‑42
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R44 (RI)
29 July 202515 Aug 2019–
30 Nov 2019A2019‑23 amendments by A2019‑23
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R45 (RI)
29 July 20251 Dec 2019–
30 Jan 2020A2019‑23 amendments by A2018-52 as amended by A2019-18
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R46 (RI)
29 July 202531 Jan 2020–
8 Mar 2020A2019‑41 amendments by A2019-34 and A2019‑41
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R47 (RI)
29 July 20259 Mar 2020–
27 Aug 2020A2019‑41 amendments by A2019‑41
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R48 (RI)
29 July 202528 Aug 2020–
8 Apr 2021A2020-42 amendments by A2020-42
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R49 (RI)
29 July 20259 Apr 2021–
10 Dec 2021A2021‑6 amendments by A2021‑6
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R50 (RI)
29 July 202511 Dec 2021–
12 Sept 2023A2021‑33 amendments by A2021‑33
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R51 (RI)
29 July 202513 Sept 2023–
29 Sept 2023A2023‑33 amendments by A2023‑33
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R52 (RI)
29 July 202530 Sept 2023–
21 Nov 2023A2023‑37 amendments by A2023‑37
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R53 (RI)
29 July 202522 Nov 2023–
26 Mar 2024A2023‑45 amendments by A2023‑45
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R54 (RI)
29 July 202527 Mar 2024–
30 June 2024A2023‑45 amendments by A2023‑45
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R55 (RI)
29 July 20251 July 2024–
30 June 2025A2024‑3 amendments by A2023‑49 as amended by A2024‑3
reissued for textual correction in s 30 (3)R56
1 July 20251 July 2025–
15 Nov 2025A2024‑3 amendments by A2023-45
and textual correction in s 30 (3)
© Australian Capital Territory 2025
0
0
0