Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act 2006 (NSW)
An Act to amend the Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 with respect to the carrying out of forensic procedures; and for other purposes.
This Act is the Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act 2006.
This Act commences on a day or days to be appointed by proclamation.
The Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 is amended as set out in Schedule 1.
The Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 is amended as set out in Schedule 2.
This Act is repealed on the day following the day on which all of the provisions of this Act have commenced.
The repeal of this Act does not, because of the operation of section 30 of the Interpretation Act 1987, affect any amendment made by this Act.
(Section 3)
Omit the definitions of
Omit “section 355 of the Crimes Act 1900” from paragraph (b).
Insert instead “the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002”.
Omit “or” from paragraph (b) and omit paragraph (c).
Insert after paragraph (b) of the definition:
an untested former offender—is defined in section 75F, and
Omit the definition. Insert instead:
(a) an external examination of a person’s private parts,
(b) the carrying out on a person of an other-administered buccal swab,
(c) the taking from a person of a sample of the person’s blood,
(d) the taking from a person of a sample of the person’s pubic hair,
(e) the taking from a person of a sample of any matter, by swab or washing, from the person’s private parts,
(f) the taking from a person of a sample of any matter, by vacuum suction, scraping or lifting by tape, from the person’s private parts,
(g) the taking from a person of a dental impression,
(h) the taking of a photograph of the person’s private parts,
(i) the taking from a person of an impression or cast of a wound from the person’s private parts.
Omit the definition. Insert instead:
(a) an external examination of a part of a person’s body, other than the person’s private parts, that requires touching of the body or removal of clothing,
(b) the carrying out on a person of a self-administered buccal swab,
(c) the taking from a person of a sample of the person’s hair, other than pubic hair,
(d) the taking from a person of a sample (such as a nail clipping) of the person’s nails or of matter from under the person’s nails,
(e) the taking from a person of a sample of any matter, by swab or washing, from any external part of the person’s body, other than the person’s private parts,
(f) the taking from a person of a sample of any matter, by vacuum suction, scraping or lifting by tape, from any external part of the person’s body, other than the person’s private parts,
(g) the taking from a person of the person’s hand print, finger print, foot print or toe print,
(h) the taking of a photograph of a part of a person’s body, other than the person’s private parts,
(i) the taking from a person of an impression or cast of a wound from a part of the person’s body, other than the person’s private parts,
(j) the taking of a person’s physical measurements (whether or not involving marking) for biomechanical analysis of an external part of the person’s body, other than the person’s private parts.
Insert in alphabetical order:
Omit “75” from paragraph (d) of the definition. Insert instead “74A”.
Insert after paragraph (d) of the definition:
order of a court under section 75L, 75M or 75N, or
Insert in alphabetical order:
Insert in alphabetical order:
Insert “declared by the regulations to be the person” after “the person”.
Insert in alphabetical order:
Omit the subsection. Insert instead:
For the purposes of this Act, a person who is required to destroy forensic material is required not only to destroy the material but also to ensure that any information that relates any such DNA profile to a person whose DNA it describes is removed from the DNA database system.
Omit “if the suspect or offender is” from section 4 (2) (c).
Insert instead “if the suspect or offender identifies as”.
Omit “is an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered”.
Insert instead “identifies as an Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander, and is not covered”.
Omit “
Insert “person identifying as” before “Aboriginal person” wherever occurring in the Table to section 6.
Omit the section. Insert instead:
Before asking a suspect to consent to a forensic procedure under this Part, a police officer must ask the suspect whether the suspect identifies as an Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander.
Omit section 9 (1) (b). Insert instead:
the suspect does not identify as an Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander.
Omit section 10 (1) (b). Insert instead:
the suspect identifies as an Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander.
Omit the subsection. Insert instead:
The police officer is not required to comply with subsection (4) if he or she is aware that the suspect:
(a) has arranged for a legal representative to be present, or
(b) has expressly and voluntarily waived his or her right to have a legal representative present,
while the suspect is being asked to consent to the forensic procedure.
Omit sections 11 and 12. Insert instead:
A police officer may not ask a suspect to undergo a forensic procedure unless satisfied:
(a) that section 8, and section 9 or 10, as the case requires, have been complied with, and
(b) that the circumstances referred to in subsection (2) or (3) exist, and
(c) that the suspect is neither a child nor an incapable person, and
(d) that the request for consent is justified in all the circumstances.
In the case of an intimate forensic procedure, or a non-intimate forensic procedure involving the taking of a sample of the suspect’s hair or the carrying out of a self-administered buccal swab:
(a) the act or omission in respect of which the suspect is a suspect must constitute a prescribed offence, and
(b) there must be reasonable grounds to believe that the procedure might produce evidence tending to confirm or disprove:
(i) that the suspect has committed the prescribed offence referred to in paragraph (a), or
(ii) that the suspect has committed some other prescribed offence.
In the case of a non-intimate forensic procedure (other than a procedure involving the taking of a sample of the suspect’s hair or the carrying out of a self-administered buccal swab):
(a) the act or omission in respect of which the suspect is a suspect must constitute an offence, and
(b) there must be reasonable grounds to believe that the procedure might produce evidence tending to confirm or disprove:
(i) that the suspect has committed the offence referred to in paragraph (a), or
(ii) that the suspect has committed some other offence.
Omit “if the police officer believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect is” from section 13 (1) (h).
Insert instead “if the suspect identifies as”.
Omit “(4), (5), (6) or (7)”. Insert instead “(4) or (5)”.
Insert “, including that the information may be compared with information from the DNA database systems of other participating jurisdictions” after “disclosure and use”.
Omit the subsection. Insert instead:
In the case of:
(a) an intimate forensic procedure, or
(b) a non-intimate forensic procedure that involves the taking of an impression or cast of a wound from a part of the suspect’s body,
the police officer must inform the suspect that the suspect may ask that a medical practitioner or dentist (depending on the kind of procedure) of his or her choice be present while the procedure is being carried out.
Omit “and the forensic procedure is a non-intimate forensic procedure or an intimate forensic procedure”.
Omit the subsections.
Omit section 15 (2) and the note appearing after that subsection. Insert instead:
If the recording of the giving of the information and the suspect’s responses (if any) by electronic means is not practicable:
(a) an independent person who is not a police officer must be present while the information is given and while any responses are made, and
(b) a police officer must make a written record of the information that is given and any responses that are made, and
(c) the police officer by whom the record is made must ensure that a copy of the record is made available to the suspect.
Part 13 contains provisions about making copies of material (including copies of tapes) available to the suspect.
Subsection (2) (a) does not apply if the suspect expressly and voluntarily waives his or her right to have an independent person present, but such a person may nevertheless be present if the investigating police officer so directs.
Omit “or 19” wherever occurring in section 17 (1) and (5).
Omit “section 356D of the Crimes Act 1900”.
Insert instead “section 115 of that Act”.
Insert at the end of the section:
If the senior police officer needs to decide between taking a sample of the suspect’s hair or the carrying out of a self-administered buccal swab, an order for the taking of a sample of hair may not be made unless, following inquiry by the police officer:
(a) the suspect has indicated that he or she prefers the taking of a sample of hair, or
(b) the suspect has failed to indicate that he or she will carry out a self-administered buccal swab.
Omit the section.
Omit the section. Insert instead:
A senior police officer may not order the carrying out of a non-intimate forensic procedure under section 18 (1) unless satisfied:
(a) that the suspect is under arrest, and
(b) that the circumstances referred to in subsection (2) or (3) exist, and
(c) that the suspect is neither a child nor an incapable person, and
(d) that the carrying out of such a procedure is justified in all the circumstances.
In the case of a non-intimate forensic procedure involving the taking of a sample of the suspect’s hair or the carrying out of a self-administered buccal swab:
(a) the act or omission in respect of which the suspect is a suspect must constitute a prescribed offence, and
(b) there must be reasonable grounds to believe that the procedure might produce evidence tending to confirm or disprove:
(i) that the suspect has committed the prescribed offence referred to in paragraph (a), or
(ii) that the suspect has committed some other prescribed offence.
In the case of a non-intimate forensic procedure (other than a procedure involving the taking of a sample of the suspect’s hair or the carrying out of a self-administered buccal swab):
(a) the act or omission in respect of which the suspect is a suspect must constitute an offence, and
(b) there must be reasonable grounds to believe that the procedure might produce evidence tending to confirm or disprove:
(i) that the suspect has committed the offence referred to in paragraph (a), or
(ii) that the suspect has committed some other offence.
Omit “or 19” wherever occurring in section 21 (1) and (4).
Insert “
Omit section 23 (c). Insert instead:
the suspect is a child or an incapable person.
Omit sections 24 and 25. Insert instead:
A Magistrate may order the carrying out of a forensic procedure if satisfied on the balance of probabilities:
(a) that the circumstances referred to in subsection (2) or (3) exist, and
(b) that the carrying out of such a procedure is justified in all the circumstances.
In the case of an intimate forensic procedure, or a non-intimate forensic procedure involving the taking of a sample of the suspect’s hair or the carrying out of a self-administered buccal swab:
(a) the act or omission in respect of which the suspect is a suspect must constitute a prescribed offence, and
(b) there must be reasonable grounds to believe that the procedure might produce evidence tending to confirm or disprove:
(i) that the suspect has committed the prescribed offence referred to in paragraph (a), or
(ii) that the suspect has committed some other prescribed offence.
In the case of a non-intimate forensic procedure (other than a procedure involving the taking of a sample of the suspect’s hair or the carrying out of a self-administered buccal swab):
(a) the act or omission in respect of which the suspect is a suspect must constitute an offence, and
(b) there must be reasonable grounds to believe that the procedure might produce evidence tending to confirm or disprove:
(i) that the suspect has committed the offence referred to in paragraph (a), or
(ii) that the suspect has committed some other offence.
In determining whether or not the carrying out of the forensic procedure is justified in all the circumstances, the Magistrate must balance the public interest in obtaining evidence as to whether or not the suspect committed the alleged offence against the public interest in upholding the suspect’s physical integrity, having regard to the following:
(a) the gravity of the alleged offence,
(b) the seriousness of the circumstances in which the offence is alleged to have been committed,
(c) the degree to which the suspect is alleged to have participated in the commission of the offence,
(d) the age, cultural background and physical and mental health of the suspect, to the extent to which they are known,
(e) in the case of a suspect who is a child or an incapable person, the best interests of the child or person,
(f) such other practicable ways of obtaining evidence as to whether or not the suspect committed the alleged offence as are less intrusive,
(g) such reasons as the suspect may have given for refusing to consent to the carrying out of the forensic procedure concerned,
(h) in the case of a suspect who is in custody, the period for which the suspect has been in custody and the reasons for any delay in the making of an application for an order under this section,
(i) such other matters as the Magistrate considers relevant to the balancing of those interests.
Omit section 26 (2) (b). Insert instead:
be supported by evidence on oath, or by affidavit, in relation to the matters as to which the Magistrate must be satisfied, as referred to in section 24 (1), and
Insert “or subsequent” after “second” wherever occurring.
Insert “or procedures” after “procedure”.
Insert “or those forensic procedures” after “that forensic procedure”.
Omit section 30 (2)–(4). Insert instead:
A suspect who is a child or an incapable person, or who identifies as an Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander:
(a) must have an interview friend present, and
(b) may be represented by a legal representative.
Subsection (2) (a) does not apply to a suspect who identifies as an Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander if the suspect expressly and voluntarily waives his or her right to have an interview friend present.
At the beginning of any hearing in relation to proceedings on an application for an order under this Division, the suspect must be asked whether he or she identifies as an Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander.
Omit “subsections (2) and (3)”. Insert instead “subsection (2)”.
Omit “of the existence of the matters referred to in section 25” from section 32 (1) (c).
Insert instead “, as referred to in section 24 (1),”.
Omit “of the matters set out in section 25”.
Insert instead “as referred to in section 24 (1)”.
Omit section 33 (5) and (6). Insert instead:
If the suspect (being a child or an incapable person, or being a person who identifies as an Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander) is in the presence of the authorised applicant when an application for an interim order is made:
(a) the suspect’s interview friend, or
(b) the suspect’s legal representative,
must also be present if reasonably practicable.
At the beginning of any hearing in relation to proceedings on an application for an order under this Division, the suspect (if present) must be asked whether he or she identifies as an Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander.
Omit “or (6)”.
Omit “subsections (5) and (6)”. Insert instead “subsection (5)”.
Insert after section 47 (2):
This section applies only to a forensic procedure that is carried out pursuant to an order under Part 4, 5, 7 or 7A.
Omit section 49 (a). Insert instead:
the person takes only so much hair as the person believes is necessary for the analysis of the sample or other examination of the hair, and
Omit the section.
Omit section 50 (4).
Insert “other-administered” before “buccal swab” in the first column of item 3.
Insert after section 51:
A self-administered buccal swab may be carried out by the suspect in the presence or view of another person, whether of the same sex as the suspect or of the opposite sex.
Insert after section 52 (3):
Subsection (3) applies only in relation to a forensic procedure that is carried out pursuant to an order under Part 4, 5, 7 or 7A.
Omit section 53 (1). Insert instead:
A suspect is entitled to request a medical practitioner or dentist (
(a) an intimate forensic procedure, or
(b) a non-intimate forensic procedure that involves the taking of an impression or cast of a wound from a part of the suspect’s body,
is being carried out.
Section 99 provides that the request may be made by the suspect’s legal representative or interview friend.
Omit section 55 (1). Insert instead:
This section applies if the suspect (not being a child or an incapable person) identifies as an Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander.
For the purpose of determining whether this section applies to a suspect, the investigating police officer must ask the suspect if the suspect identifies as an Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander.
Omit “(other than the taking of a hand print, finger print, foot print or toe print)” from section 57 (1).
Insert after section 57 (1):
Subsection (1) does not apply to:
(a) the taking of a hand print, finger print, foot print or toe print, or
(b) the taking of a photograph, but only if the taking of such a photograph constitutes a non-intimate forensic procedure.
Omit “an Aboriginal person or a Torres Strait Islander not covered by section 54”.
Insert instead “a person who identifies as an Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander, and is not a child or an incapable person,”.
Omit the subsection. Insert instead:
Subsection (4) does not apply if the suspect expressly and voluntarily waives his or her right to have an independent person present, but such a person may nevertheless be present if the investigating police officer so directs.
Omit the section. Insert instead:
If material from a sample taken from a suspect is analysed in relation to the investigation of an offence, the investigating police officer must ensure that, if the suspect so requests in writing:
(a) a copy of the suspect’s DNA profile that has been derived from the sample, and
(b) a statement as to whether or not a match has been found, in relation to the investigation, between the suspect’s DNA profile and any other DNA profile,
are made available to the suspect.
A suspect is to be informed of his or her right to make such a request.
The requirements of subsection (1) need not be complied with in a manner that would, or at a time when to do so would:
(a) prejudice the investigation of any offence, or
(b) be a source of embarrassment to a victim of any offence.
Despite subsection (3), the requirements of subsection (1) must be complied with a reasonable time before evidence of the suspect’s DNA profile, or of any match between the suspect’s DNA profile and any other DNA profile, is adduced in any prosecution of the suspect for the offence.
Part 13 contains provisions about making copies of material available to the suspect.
Omit section 61 (1). Insert instead:
This Part applies to the following intimate forensic procedures:
(a) the taking of a sample of blood,
(b) the carrying out of an other-administered buccal swab.
Insert after section 61 (2) (b):
the carrying out of a self-administered buccal swab.
Omit the subsection.
Insert at the end of section 62 (1) (b):
, or
by order of a court under section 74.
Omit section 63 (2).
Omit the section.
Insert before section 65:
Before asking a serious indictable offender to consent to a forensic procedure under this Part, a person must ask the offender whether the offender identifies as an Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander.
Omit “section 62, 63 or 64” from section 65 (2).
Insert instead “section 62 or 63”.
Omit “(2), (3) or (4)” from section 69 (1) (h). Insert instead “(2) or (3)”.
Insert “and, in particular, that the information may be compared with information from the DNA database systems of other participating jurisdictions” after “Part 11 or 12”.
Omit “if the senior police officer has taken into account the matters set out in section 71”.
Omit the subsection.
Omit “has not consented, and” from section 70 (1) (b).
Insert instead “has not consented.”.
Omit the paragraph.
Omit the subsection. Insert instead:
If the senior police officer needs to decide between taking a sample of the offender’s hair or the carrying out of a self-administered buccal swab, an order for the taking of a sample of hair may not be made unless, following inquiry by the police officer:
(a) the offender has indicated that he or she prefers the taking of a sample of hair, or
(b) the offender has failed to indicate that he or she will carry out a self-administered buccal swab.
Omit the section.
Omit section 74 (1)–(3). Insert instead:
A police officer may apply to any court for an order for the carrying out of a forensic procedure to which this Part applies on a serious indictable offender who is serving a sentence of imprisonment in a correctional centre or other place of detention.
Omit the subsection.
Omit section 75. Insert instead:
If a court orders the carrying out of a forensic procedure to which this Part applies on a serious indictable offender, the court may order that a police officer, together with a person who, under Part 6 as applied by section 65, may carry out the forensic procedure, be permitted to attend on the offender to enable the forensic procedure to be carried out.
A serious indictable offender in respect of whom a forensic procedure is ordered to be carried out under section 74 must not, without reasonable excuse, refuse or fail to permit the forensic procedure to be carried out.
Maximum penalty: 50 penalty units or 12 months imprisonment, or both.
Insert after Part 7:
This Part applies to the following intimate forensic procedures:
(a) the taking of a sample of blood,
(b) the carrying out of an other-administered buccal swab.
This Part applies to the following non-intimate forensic procedures:
(a) the taking of a sample of hair other than pubic hair,
(b) the carrying out of a self-administered buccal swab.
This Part applies to any person:
(a) who has served a sentence of imprisonment for a serious indictable offence in a correctional centre or other place of detention, and
(b) who is served with a court attendance notice in respect of an indictable offence,
if it appears that the person’s DNA profile is not contained in the offenders index of the DNA database system (an
A person is authorised to carry out a non-intimate forensic procedure to which this Part applies on an untested former offender:
(a) with the informed consent of the former offender, or
(b) by order of a senior police officer under section 75I, or
(c) by order of a court under section 75L.
A person is authorised to carry out an intimate forensic procedure to which this Part applies on an untested former offender:
(a) with the informed consent of the former offender, or
(b) by order of a court under section 75L.
Before asking an untested former offender to consent to a forensic procedure under this Part, a police officer must ask the former offender whether the former offender identifies as an Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander.
Part 6 applies to the carrying out of a forensic procedure on an untested former offender under this Part as if the references to the suspect in Part 6 were references to an untested former offender.
A person is authorised by section 75B or 75C to carry out a forensic procedure in accordance with Part 6 as applied by this section and not otherwise.
An untested former offender gives informed consent to the carrying out of a forensic procedure under this Part if the former offender consents to the carrying out of the procedure after a police officer:
(a) requests the former offender to consent to the forensic procedure under section 75G, and
(b) informs the former offender about the forensic procedure in accordance with section 75H, and
(c) gives the former offender the opportunity to communicate, or attempt to communicate, with an Australian legal practitioner of the former offender’s choice.
The police officer must allow the former offender to communicate, or attempt to communicate, with the Australian legal practitioner in private unless the police officer suspects on reasonable grounds that the former offender might attempt to destroy or contaminate any evidence that might be obtained by carrying out the forensic procedure.
Section 103 states that the burden lies on the prosecution to prove on the balance of probabilities that a police officer had a belief on reasonable grounds.
A police officer may request an untested former offender (other than a child or an incapable person) to consent to a forensic procedure to which this Part applies being carried out on the former offender.
The police officer must (personally or in writing) inform the untested former offender of the following:
(a) the purpose for which the forensic procedure is required,
(b) if the police officer wants the forensic procedure carried out in relation to an offence—the offence concerned,
(c) the way in which the forensic procedure is to be carried out,
(d) that the forensic procedure may produce evidence against the former offender that might be used in a court of law,
(e) that the forensic procedure will be carried out by a person who may carry out the procedure under Part 6 as applied by section 75E,
(f) if the forensic procedure is the taking of a sample of blood—that the former offender may request that a medical officer be present while the blood is taken,
(g) that the former offender may refuse consent to the carrying out of the forensic procedure,
(h) the consequences of not consenting, as specified in subsection (2) or (3) (whichever is applicable),
(i) the effect of section 84 (if applicable),
(j) that information obtained from the analysis of forensic material obtained from the carrying out of the forensic procedure may be placed on the DNA database system of this State, or become part of a national DNA matching scheme, or both, and, in particular, that the information may be compared with information from the DNA database systems of other participating jurisdictions.
The police officer must (personally or in writing) inform an untested former offender requested to undergo a non-intimate forensic procedure to which this Part applies that, if the former offender does not consent, a senior police officer may order the carrying out of the forensic procedure under section 75I.
The police officer must (personally or in writing) inform an untested former offender requested to undergo an intimate forensic procedure to which this Part applies that, if the former offender does not consent, an application may be made to a court for an order authorising the carrying out of the forensic procedure.
A senior police officer may order the carrying out of a non-intimate forensic procedure on an untested former offender if:
(a) the former offender has been requested under section 75G to consent to the carrying out of the forensic procedure, and
(b) the former offender has not consented, and
(c) the former offender is under arrest or otherwise in custody.
If the senior police officer needs to decide between taking a sample of the former offender’s hair or the carrying out of a self-administered buccal swab, an order for the taking of a sample of hair may not be made unless, following inquiry by the police officer:
(a) the former offender has indicated that he or she prefers the taking of a sample of hair, or
(b) the former offender has failed to indicate that he or she will carry out a self-administered buccal swab.
The consent of an untested former offender to the carrying out of a forensic procedure under this Part is not effective unless:
(a) the consent is in writing and in a form containing the particulars prescribed by the regulations, and
(b) the consent is signed by the former offender, and
(c) the signature is witnessed by a person other than a police officer, and
(d) the former offender is given a copy of the consent as soon as practicable after it is signed and witnessed.
At the time of, or as soon as practicable after, making an order under section 75I, a senior police officer must make a record of:
(a) the order, and
(b) the date and time when the order was made, and
(c) the reasons for making it,
and must sign the record.
The senior police officer must ensure that a copy of the record is made available to the untested former offender as soon as practicable after the record is made.
A police officer may apply to any court for an order for the carrying out of a forensic procedure to which this Part applies on an untested former offender.
A court may order the carrying out of a forensic procedure under this section if satisfied that the carrying out of the forensic procedure is justified in all the circumstances.
If a court makes an order for the carrying out of a forensic procedure on an untested former offender, the court must:
(a) specify the forensic procedure authorised to be carried out, and
(b) give reasons for making the order, and
(c) ensure that a written record of the order is kept, and
(d) order the former offender (if present) to attend for the carrying out of the forensic procedure, and
(e) inform the former offender (if present) that reasonable force may be used to ensure that he or she complies with the order for the carrying out of the forensic procedure.
The court may give directions as to the time and place at which the procedure is to be carried out.
If a court orders the carrying out of a forensic procedure to which this Part applies on an untested former offender, the court may order that a police officer, together with a person who, under Part 6 as applied by section 75E, may carry out the forensic procedure, be permitted to attend on the former offender to enable the forensic procedure to be carried out.
An untested former offender in respect of whom a forensic procedure is ordered to be carried out under section 75L must not, without reasonable excuse, refuse or fail to permit the forensic procedure to be carried out.
Maximum penalty: 50 penalty units or 12 months imprisonment, or both.
Omit section 76 (1) and (2). Insert instead:
In this Act,
(a) a person (other than a child or an incapable person) who consents to a request by a police officer for the person to undergo a forensic procedure, or
(b) a child who consents, and whose parent or guardian consents, to a request by a police officer for the child to undergo a forensic procedure, or
(c) an incapable person whose parent or guardian consents to a request by a police officer for the person to undergo a forensic procedure,
but does not include a suspect or an excluded volunteer.
A person is authorised to carry out a forensic procedure on a volunteer (other than a child or an incapable person) with the informed consent of the volunteer given in accordance with section 77.
A person is authorised to carry out a forensic procedure on a volunteer who is a child:
(a) with the informed consent of the child’s parent or guardian, given in accordance with section 77, or
(b) if the informed consent of the child’s parent or guardian cannot be obtained, by order of a Magistrate under section 80,
and, in either case, with the informed consent of the child.
A person is authorised to carry out a forensic procedure on a volunteer who is an incapable person:
(a) with the informed consent of the person’s parent or guardian given in accordance with section 77, or
(b) if the informed consent of the person’s parent or guardian cannot be obtained, by order of a Magistrate under section 80.
Omit “Subsection (2) (b) (i) does not”.
Insert instead “Subsections (2A) and (2B) do not”.
Insert after section 76A:
Before asking a person to consent to a forensic procedure under this Part, a police officer must ask the person whether he or she identifies as an Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander.
Insert before section 77 (1) (a):
the purpose for which the forensic procedure is required,
the offence in relation to which the police officer wants the forensic procedure to be carried out,
Insert after section 77 (1) (c):
that the forensic procedure will be carried out by an appropriately qualified police officer or person,
Insert after section 77 (1) (f):
the effect of section 84 (if applicable).
Insert “and, in particular, that the information may be compared with information from the DNA database systems of other participating jurisdictions” after “system”.
Insert after section 77 (2):
Any requirement of this section for a volunteer to be given information is taken, in the case of a volunteer who is a child, to be a requirement for the child to be given information in a way that is comprehensible to the child, having regard to his or her age and level of understanding.
Omit section 80 (1) (b) (i). Insert instead:
the parent or guardian is a suspect, and
Omit the section. Insert instead:
This section applies if, after a forensic procedure is carried out on a person who is:
(a) a serious indictable offender under Part 7, or
(b) an untested former offender under Part 7A,
the conviction by virtue of which he or she is such a person (or, if there is more than one such conviction, each of them) is quashed.
As soon as practicable after the expiry of the time limited for appealing against the quashing of the conviction or convictions, the police officer in charge of the investigation of the offence must ensure that any forensic material obtained as a result of the carrying out of the procedure is destroyed.
Insert “or 7A” after “Part 7” in paragraph (a) of the definition of
Insert “, untested former offender” after “offender”, and “, 7A” after “Part 7”, in paragraph (c) of the definition of
Insert “for the time being” after “authorised” in section 92 (2).
Omit “must remove any identifying information relating to a DNA profile of an offender on the offenders index of the system” from section 94 (3).
Insert instead “must ensure that any identifying information relating to a DNA profile of an offender on the offenders index is removed”.
Omit the definitions of
Insert instead:
(a) a law of the Commonwealth, or of a State or Territory, that substantially corresponds to Part 11, or
(b) such provisions of a law of the Commonwealth, or of a State or Territory, as are declared by the regulations to be a corresponding law for the purposes of this Act.
Omit “DNA database system that is kept under” from paragraph (b).
Insert instead “database of DNA profiles that is kept in accordance with”.
Omit “responsible Ministers” from section 96 (1).
Insert instead “responsible authorities”.
Omit section 97 (1) and (1A). Insert instead:
The Minister may enter into arrangements with a responsible authority of a participating jurisdiction under which:
(a) information from the DNA database of this State is to be transmitted to that authority for the purposes of:
(i) the investigation of, or the conduct of proceedings for, an offence against the law of this State or the law of the participating jurisdiction, or
(ii) the identification of missing or deceased persons, and
(b) information from a DNA database of the participating jurisdiction is to be transmitted to the Commissioner of Police for the purposes of:
(i) the investigation of, or the conduct of proceedings for, an offence against the law of this State or the law of the participating jurisdiction, or
(ii) the identification of missing or deceased persons.
Without limiting subsection (1), the Minister may enter into arrangements with a responsible authority of the Commonwealth under which information from the DNA database of this State (
(a) comparing the information so transmitted with information supplied to it from the DNA database of a participating jurisdiction (
the participating jurisdiction’s information ), and(b) identifying to the Commissioner of Police or to the responsible person for the DNA database of this State, and to that authority, any matches that are found as a result of the comparison, and
(c) transmitting this State’s information with respect to those matches to that authority or to the responsible person (however described) for the DNA database of the participating jurisdiction, and
(d) transmitting the participating jurisdiction’s information with respect to those matches to the Commissioner of Police or to the responsible person for the DNA database of this State.
Such an arrangement may not authorise the comparison of information so as to match DNA profiles in a manner that would contravene section 93 were the information contained wholly within the DNA database of this State.
Omit “or offender” wherever occurring in section 98 (2) (a)–(e).
Insert instead “, offender or untested former offender”.
Omit “or 7” wherever occurring. Insert instead “, 7 or 7A”.
Omit “if the investigating police officer concerned believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect or offender is” from section 99 (1) (c).
Insert instead “if the suspect or offender identifies as”.
Omit “if the investigating police officer believes on reasonable grounds that the suspect, offender or volunteer is” from section 100 (2) (c).
Insert instead “if the suspect, offender or volunteer identifies as”.
Insert “a person who identifies as” after “prove that” in section 106 (a).
Omit “30 (4),”. Insert instead “15 (3), 30 (3),”.
Omit the heading to the section. Insert instead:
Insert at the end of clause 1 (1):
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act 2006
Insert after Part 3 of Schedule 2:
In this Part,
Part 7A applies to and in respect of any person who, after the commencement of that Part, is served with a court attendance notice referred to in section 75A (3) (b), and so applies regardless of when the person served the sentence of imprisonment referred to in section 75A (3) (a).
The amendments to section 97 that are made by the 2006 amending Act do not affect any arrangement that was in force under that section immediately before the commencement of those amendments.
The amendments to this Act that are made by the 2006 amending Act do not affect any consent that had been given for the purposes of this Act before the commencement of those amendments.
(Section 4)
Insert after section 117 (1) (m):
any time that is reasonably required to carry out a forensic procedure on the person under the Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000, or to prepare, make and dispose of an application for an order for the carrying out of such a procedure.
Insert after section 133 (2):
This section does not authorise a police officer to take from any person, or to require any person to provide, any sample of the person’s hair, blood, urine, saliva or other body tissue or body fluid.
Subsection (3) does not affect a police officer’s power to take any such sample, or to require the provision of any such sample, for the purposes of, and in accordance with the requirements of, any other Act or law.
See, for example, the powers conferred by the Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000.
0
0
0