Crimes Amendment Act 2007 (NSW)
An Act to amend the Crimes Act 1900 to increase penalties for the reckless infliction of grievous bodily harm, to replace malicious as a fault element of offences, to modernise blackmail offences and to make other reforms of the criminal law.
This Act is the Crimes Amendment Act 2007.
Sections 1–6, Schedule 1 [7], Schedule 2 and Schedule 3.1 (except item [2]) commence on the date of assent to this Act.
This Act commences on a day or days to be appointed by proclamation, except as provided by subsection (1).
The Crimes Act 1900 is amended as set out in Schedules 1 and 2.
The Acts specified in Schedule 3 are amended as set out in that Schedule.
The matter appearing under the heading “Explanatory note” in any of the Schedules does not form part of this Act.
This Act is repealed on the day following the day on which all of the provisions of this Act have commenced.
The repeal of this Act does not, because of the operation of section 30 of the Interpretation Act 1987, affect any amendment made by this Act.
(Section 3)
Insert at the end of the definition of
, and
any grievous bodily disease (in which case a reference to the infliction of grievous bodily harm includes a reference to causing a person to contract a grievous bodily disease).
The amendment extends the definition to make it clear that causing harm to a person includes causing a person to contract a disease. As a consequence, item [9] omits the separate offence under section 36.
Omit the section.
This section (which defines “malicious” for the purposes of offences under the Act) is being repealed as a result of the replacement of that term in offences under the Act with the modern fault element of “intention” or “recklessness”.
Omit “maliciously” wherever occurring.
Insert instead “intentionally or recklessly”.
This item makes consequential amendments on the omission of the concept of “malicious” by item [2].
Omit the section. Insert instead:
A person who:
(a) wounds any person, or
(b) causes grievous bodily harm to any person,
with intent to cause grievous bodily harm to that or any other person is guilty of an offence.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 25 years.
A person who:
(a) wounds any person, or
(b) causes grievous bodily harm to any person,
with intent to resist or prevent his or her (or another person’s) lawful arrest or detention is guilty of an offence.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 25 years.
If on the trial of a person charged with an offence against this section the jury is not satisfied that the offence is proven but is satisfied that the person has committed an offence against section 35, the jury may acquit the person of the offence charged and find the person guilty of an offence against section 35. The person is liable to punishment accordingly.
The amendment recasts the offences under section 33 as a consequence of the omission of the concept of “malicious” by item [2] and separates the offence relating to intention to cause grievous bodily harm from the offence relating to resisting or preventing arrest or detention. The offence relating to discharging firearms is to be transferred to the related offences in section 33A.
Omit the section. Insert instead:
A person who:
(a) discharges any firearm or other loaded arms, or
(b) attempts to discharge any firearm or other loaded arms,
with intent to cause grievous bodily harm to any person is guilty of an offence.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 25 years.
A person who:
(a) discharges any firearm or other loaded arms, or
(b) attempts to discharge any firearm or other loaded arms,
with intent to resist or prevent his or her (or another person’s) lawful arrest or detention is guilty of an offence.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 25 years.
The amendment recasts the offences under section 33A as a consequence of the omission of the concept of “malicious” by item [2] and separates the offence relating to intention to cause grievous bodily harm from the offence relating to resisting or preventing arrest or detention. The revised section also covers offences transferred from section 33 dealing with related offences concerning firearms. The offences currently in section 33A that carry a lesser penalty than the virtually identical offences in section 33 have not been carried forward.
Omit the section.
The section is omitted as a consequence of the transfer of the alternative verdict provision to section 33 (3).
Omit the section. Insert instead:
A person who, in the company of another person or persons, recklessly causes grievous bodily harm to any person is guilty of an offence.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 14 years.
A person who recklessly causes grievous bodily harm to any person is guilty of an offence.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
A person who, in the company of another person or persons, recklessly wounds any person is guilty of an offence.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
A person who recklessly wounds any person is guilty of an offence.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 7 years.
If on the trial of a person charged with an offence against any subsection of this section the jury is not satisfied that the offence is proven but is satisfied that the person has committed an offence against any other subsection of this section (that carries a lesser maximum penalty), the jury may acquit the person of the offence charged and find the person guilty of an offence against that other subsection. The person is liable to punishment accordingly.
The amendment recasts the offences under section 35 as a consequence of the omission of the concept of “malicious” by item [2]. In addition, the maximum penalty for reckless causing of grievous bodily harm is increased from 7 years to 10 years (and from 10 years to 14 years in the case of an offence committed in company).
Omit section 35A (1) and (2). Insert instead:
A person who:
(a) has control of a dog, and
(b) does any act that causes the dog to inflict grievous bodily harm on another person, and
(c) is reckless as to the injury that may be caused to a person by the act,
is guilty of an offence.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
A person who:
(a) has control of a dog, and
(b) does any act that causes the dog to inflict actual bodily harm on another person, and
(c) is reckless as to the injury that may be caused to a person by the act,
is guilty of an offence.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years.
The amendment recasts the offences under section 35A as a consequence of the omission of the concept of “malicious” by item [2]. In addition, the maximum penalty for recklessness in causing a dog to inflict grievous bodily harm is increased from 7 years to 10 years (consistently with the proposed increase for the general offence of reckless infliction of grievous bodily harm by item [10]).
Omit the section.
This item omits the offence as a result of the extension of the meaning of “grievous bodily harm” by item [1] to cover diseases and the consequent extension of the offence under section 33 of inflicting grievous bodily harm.
Omit the sections. Insert instead:
A person is guilty of an offence if:
(a) the person administers to another person, or causes another person to take, any poison or other destructive or noxious thing, and
(b) the poison or other thing endangers the life of, or inflicts grievous bodily harm on, the other person, and
(c) the person intends to injure, or is reckless about injuring, the other person.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
If on the trial of a person charged with an offence against this section the jury is not satisfied that the offence is proven but is satisfied that the person has committed an offence against section 41 or 41A, the jury may acquit the person of the offence charged and find the person guilty of an offence against section 41 or 41A. The person is liable to punishment accordingly.
A person is guilty of an offence if:
(a) the person administers to another person, or causes another person to take, any poison or other destructive or noxious thing, and
(b) the person intends to injure, or to cause distress or pain to, the other person.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years.
A person is guilty of an offence if:
(a) the person introduces any poison or other destructive or noxious thing into a supply of water, and
(b) the person intends to injure any person or persons.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years.
The amendment recasts the offences under sections 39, 41 and 41A relating to poisoning etc as a consequence of the omission of the concept of “malicious” by item [2]. The alternative verdict provision of section 40 is transferred to section 39 (2) and applied to the offence under section 41A in addition to the offence under section 41.
Omit “or maliciously does, or causes to be done, any bodily harm to any wife, apprentice or servant, or to any insane person”.
The amendment omits the second limb to this offence as a result of the omission of the concept of “malicious” by item [2]. The matter is covered by the general assault offences under the Act.
Omit “maliciously” wherever occurring.
This item makes a consequential amendment on the omission of the concept of “malicious” by item [2].
Omit “maliciously” wherever occurring. Insert instead “recklessly”.
This item makes a consequential amendment on the omission of the concept of “malicious” by item [2].
Omit the heading to the Subdivision. Insert instead:
The amendment is consequential on the enactment of a general blackmail offence in item [22].
Insert at the end of the section:
It is immaterial whether any such menace is of violence or injury by the offender or by any other person.
The amendment is consequential on the repeal of section 105 by item [16].
Omit the sections.
The amendment is consequential on the enactment of a general blackmail offence in item [22].
Insert in alphabetical order in section 105A (1):
The amendment is consequential on the proposed repeal of sections 106 and 107.
Omit the sections.
This item omits offences that will be covered by the proposed extension of the offences in sections 112 and 113.
Omit section 112 (1). Insert instead:
A person who:
(a) breaks and enters any dwelling-house or other building and commits any serious indictable offence therein, or
(b) being in any dwelling-house or other building commits any serious indictable offence therein and breaks out of the dwelling-house or other building,
is guilty of an offence and liable to imprisonment for 14 years.
The amendment extends the offence to all dwelling-houses and other buildings. At present the offence applies to dwelling-houses, buildings within the curtilage of a dwelling-house, school house, shop, warehouse, or counting-house, office, store, garage, pavilion, factory or workshop, or any building belonging to Her Majesty or to any Government department, or to any municipal or other public authority.
Omit section 113 (1). Insert instead:
A person who breaks and enters any dwelling-house or other building with intent to commit any serious indictable offence therein is guilty of an offence and liable to imprisonment for 10 years.
The amendment extends the offence to all dwelling-houses and other buildings. At present the offence applies to dwelling-houses, buildings within the curtilage of a dwelling-house, school house, shop, warehouse, or counting-house, office, store, garage, pavilion, factory or workshop, or any building belonging to Her Majesty or to any Government department, or to any municipal or other public authority.
Omit “shall be taken not to have been done maliciously” from section 194 (3).
Insert instead “does not constitute an element of any offence under this Division”.
The amendment makes a consequential change as a result of the omission of the concept of “malicious” by item [2] and the amendments to sections 195–198.
Insert before Part 5:
A person who makes any unwarranted demand with menaces:
(a) with the intention of obtaining a gain or of causing a loss, or
(b) with the intention of influencing the exercise of a public duty,
is guilty of an offence.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
A person is guilty of an offence against this subsection if the person commits an offence against subsection (1) by an accusation, or a threatened accusation, that a person has committed a serious indictable offence.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 14 years.
For the purposes of this Part, a demand with menaces is
The demand need not be a demand for money or other property.
For the purposes of this Part,
(a) an express or implied threat of any action detrimental or unpleasant to another person, and
(b) a general threat of detrimental or unpleasant action that is implied because the person making the unwarranted demand holds a public office.
A threat against an individual does not constitute a menace unless:
(a) the threat would cause an individual of normal stability and courage to act unwillingly in response to the threat, or
(b) the threat would cause the particular individual to act unwillingly in response to the threat and the person who makes the threat is aware of the vulnerability of the particular individual to the threat.
A threat against a Government or body corporate does not constitute a menace unless:
(a) the threat would ordinarily cause an unwilling response, or
(b) the threat would cause an unwilling response because of a particular vulnerability of which the person making the threat is aware.
It is immaterial whether the menaces relate to action to be taken by the person making the demand.
For the purposes of this Part:
(a) a
gain means gain in money or other property, whether temporary or permanent, and includes keeping what one has, andobtaining a gain means obtaining a gain for oneself or for another, and(b) a
loss means loss in money or other property, whether temporary or permanent, and includes not getting what one might get, andcausing a loss means causing a loss to another.
For the purposes of this Part, a
(a) that is conferred on a person as the holder of a public office, or
(b) that a person holds himself or herself out as having as the holder of a public office.
Proposed Part 4B replaces existing blackmail/extortion offences (sections 100–103) with an offence based on the Model Criminal Code and the Commonwealth Criminal Code. The proposed Part extends the existing offences to influencing the exercise of public duties (and not merely to obtain a gain or cause a loss) and to threats of any kind. The maximum penalty for the offence is the current penalty of imprisonment for 10 years, or imprisonment for 14 years if a person is accused or threatened to be accused of a serious indictable offence (the Model Criminal Code provides a penalty of imprisonment for 12 years in both cases).
Omit “Maliciously destroying” wherever occurring.
Insert instead “Destroying”.
This amendment is consequential on other amendments made in this Schedule.
Omit the matter relating to sections 36, 100A, 101, 102 and 103 in the Table to section 428B and revise the headings to other sections in that Table to reflect the headings inserted by other items of this Schedule.
The amendment is consequential on other amendments in this Schedule.
Omit the section.
The amendment repeals an outdated summary offence (carrying a maximum penalty of $220) of killing, taking or wounding house-doves or pigeons in circumstances not amounting to common law larceny. To the extent that any killing or wounding amounts to unnecessary cruelty, proceedings may be taken under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979.
Insert at the end of the Schedule, with appropriate Part and clause numbers:
The repeal of section 5 of this Act by the Crimes Amendment Act 2007 does not affect the operation of any provision of this Act (including a repealed provision) that refers to “malicious” or “maliciously” or of any indictment or charge in which malice is by law an ingredient of the crime.
(Section 3)
Omit the section.
This section is now spent.
Omit “The sections mentioned in the Second Schedule”.
Insert instead “The Parts and sections mentioned in Schedule 2”.
Omit the section.
This expression is defined in the Interpretation Act 1987.
Omit “the Eleventh Schedule” from section 63 (2).
Insert instead “Schedule 11”.
Insert before section 93A:
Omit the section.
This provision, relating to the abolition of common law offences, is being transferred to Schedule 3.
Omit the heading. Insert instead:
Omit the heading. Insert instead:
Renumber the sections as sections 93J–93P.
Omit the heading. Insert instead:
Renumber the sections as sections 93Q and 93R.
Omit the heading. Insert instead:
Renumber the sections as sections 93S–93U.
Omit “this Part” wherever occurring. Insert instead “this Division”.
Omit “93IB, 93IC or 93ID” wherever occurring.
Insert instead “93K, 93L or 93M”.
Omit “93IB or 93IC” wherever occurring. Insert instead “93K or 93L”.
Omit “93IK” wherever occurring. Insert instead “93T”.
Insert before Part 4:
Omit section 344 and insert the section (renumbered as section 93V) in Division 6 of Part 3A.
The existing offence relating to unlawful gambling is being transferred to the Part of the Act containing public order offences.
Renumber as section 94AA.
Omit the section.
This provision relating to the abolition of a common law offence of forgery is being transferred to Schedule 3.
Insert at the end of the section:
In this section:
This amendment incorporates the separate offence in section 358C which is being omitted by this Schedule.
Omit the heading.
Omit the Part.
The Part only contains an offence relating to harbouring interstate escapees, which is being transferred to the general offence in section 310G.
Omit the heading.
Omit the section.
This provision relating to the abolition of a common law presumption is being transferred to Schedule 3.
Omit “the Tenth Schedule” wherever occurring. Insert instead “Schedule 10”.
Omit the Part.
This Part is now spent.
Insert before section 581:
Schedule 3 has effect.
Omit “The Eleventh Schedule”. Insert instead “Schedule 11”.
Omit the heading to the Schedule. Insert instead:
Omit “Sections 547A–547C (in Part 14).”.
Insert after the Second Schedule:
(Section 580H)
The common law offence of arson is abolished.
This clause does not apply to an offence committed before the commencement of section 3 of the Crimes (Criminal Destruction and Damage) Amendment Act 1987.
The common law offence of forgery is abolished.
This clause does not apply to an offence committed before 16 July 1989 (the date of commencement of the Crimes (Computers and Forgery) Amendment Act 1989).
The common law offences of riot, rout and affray are abolished.
This clause does not apply to an offence committed before 19 February 1989 (the date of commencement of the Crimes (Amendment) Act 1988).
Any presumption of law that an offence committed by a wife in the presence of her husband is committed under coercion of the husband is abolished.
This clause does not apply to an offence committed before 1 October 1924 (the date of commencement of the Crimes (Amendment) Act 1924).
Rename the Schedule as Schedule 10.
Insert at the end of the Schedule:
A reference in this Schedule to a provision of this Act is a reference to the provision as in force immediately before the commencement of the Crimes Amendment Act 2007.
Omit the heading to the Schedule. Insert instead:
(Section 4)
Criminal Procedure Act 1986 No 209Omit section 272 (2) and (3).
Insert after item 12 in Part 3 of Table 1:
An offence under section 249K of the Crimes Act 1900.
Insert “(or section 93K, 93L or 93M)” after “93ID”.
Insert “(or section 93Q or 93R)” after “93II”.
Insert “(or section 93T (2) or (3))” after “93IK (2) or (3)”.
Insert “(or section 93T (1))” after “section 93IK (1)”.
Fire Brigades Act 1989 No 192Omit “maliciously”.
Insert instead “intentionally or recklessly”.
Pipelines Act 1967 No 90Omit “maliciously”. Insert instead “intentionally”.
0
0
0