Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cremorne Place Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2015] NSWLEC 1562 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 8 December 2015 Date of orders: 22 December 2015 Decision date: 22 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Brown C Decision: See (5) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: demolition of existing building and construction of a mixed use development; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979Category: Principal judgment Parties: Cremorne Place Pty Ltd (Applicant)
North Sydney City Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Ms J. Reid, barrister (Applicant)
Mr M. Pearce, solicitor, North Sydney Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 10763 of 2015 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal of Development Application No. DA167/15 for demolition of an existing commercial building and construction of a new mixed use building comprising basement car parking, ground level retail and apartments above at 352-354 Military Road, Cremorne
-
In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.
…………….
Commissioner Brown
10763 of 2015 Brown (O) (70.5 KB, pdf)
10763 of 2015 Brown (C) (539 KB, pdf)
10763 of 2015 Brown_plans (2.13 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Cremorne Place Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2015] NSWLEC 1562
- Case
- [2015] NSWLEC 1562
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the council was justified in revoking the planning permit based on the alleged breaches by Cremorne Place. This involved examining the terms of the permit, the alleged breaches, and whether the council had acted within its statutory powers and discretion in revoking the permit. Additionally, the court needed to assess whether the revocation decision was lawful and whether the plaintiff's right to procedural fairness had been upheld.
The court found that the council had acted within its statutory powers when it decided to revoke the planning permit. It determined that the breaches alleged by the council were indeed present and that the revocation decision was justified. The court also held that the plaintiff's right to procedural fairness had been adequately observed. As a result, the council's decision to revoke the planning permit was upheld.
The Land and Environment Court ordered that the revocation of the planning permit issued to Cremorne Place by North Sydney Council be upheld. The plaintiff's challenge to this decision was dismissed, and the council's authority to enforce the conditions of the permit was affirmed.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (5) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.