CRC16 v Minister for Home Affairs

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

CRC16

v

MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS & ANOR

[2019] HCASL 320
M88/2019

  1. The applicant requires an extension of time to enable this application for special leave to appeal to proceed. The application does not provide any reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Federal Court of Australia. An appeal would enjoy no prospects of success. Accordingly, it would be futile to grant an extension of time. The application should be dismissed.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

P.A. Keane J.J. Edelman
16 October 2019
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read CRC16 v Minister for Home Affairs and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] HCASL 320
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

CRC16, an Australian citizen, sought an extension of time for an application for special leave to appeal against the Minister for Home Affairs. The Federal Court had earlier dismissed the applicant's claims regarding an alleged breach of natural justice in the context of visa cancellation and deportation proceedings. The High Court was tasked with considering whether the application for an extension of time should be granted to allow the special leave to appeal to proceed.

The primary legal issue before the High Court was whether the application for an extension of time should be granted. The Court had to consider whether the application provided any reason to doubt the correctness of the Federal Court's decision and if the appeal had any prospects of success. The Court also had to determine whether granting an extension of time would be futile.

The High Court found that the application for an extension of time did not provide any reason to doubt the correctness of the Federal Court's decision. The Court concluded that an appeal would enjoy no prospects of success and that it would be futile to grant an extension of time. As a result, the application was dismissed. The Court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.