Craig Ronald Cairns v Aussie Access Pty Ltd

Case [2023] FWC 166


[2023] FWC 166

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Craig Ronald Cairns
v

Aussie Access Pty Ltd

(U2022/12411)

COMMISSIONER BISSETT

MELBOURNE, 19 JANUARY 2023

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy – unpaid application – dismissal under s.587 at the Commission’s initiative.

  1. On 31 December 2022 Mr Craig Ronald Cairns made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

  1. The application was incomplete in that Mr Cairns did not pay the required fee or file a completed waiver form.

  1. On 6 January 2023 the Commission emailed correspondence to Mr Cairns’s nominated email address advising that his application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if he wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment was not made or a waiver form was not received within 7 calendar days the application may be dismissed.

  1. On 11 January 2023 the Commission emailed correspondence to Mr Cairns’s nominated email address reminding that his application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if he wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment was not made or a waiver form was not received, the application may be dismissed. 

  1. A final attempt to contact Mr Cairns on his nominated telephone number was made by the Commission on 12 January 2023 to obtain payment or a completed waiver form. The call was not answered. A voicemail message was left advising Mr Cairns that payment of the required fee was still outstanding.

  1. To date there has been no response from Mr Cairns, the required fee has not been paid and a completed waiver form has not been received.

  1. Section 395 of the FW Act, which deals with application fees, provides as follows:

395 Application fees

(1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.

(2) The regulations may prescribe:

(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and

(b) a method for indexing the fee; and

(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.

  1. Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides as follows:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.

  1. I am satisfied that, as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the FW Act, the application was not made in accordance with the FW Act. As such, I order that the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the FW Act.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR749816>

Details
AGLC
Craig Ronald Cairns v Aussie Access Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 166
Case
[2023] FWC 166
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Craig Ronald Cairns applied to the Fair Work Commission (FWC) for an unfair dismissal remedy, but the application was incomplete as it did not include the required fee or a completed waiver form. The FWC notified Cairns of the insufficiency on multiple occasions and warned him that failure to address the issue could result in dismissal of the application. Despite these notifications, Cairns did not respond or rectify the application. The Commission, under section 587 of the Fair Work Act 2009, dismissed the application as it was not made in accordance with the Act due to the missing fee. The Commissioner determined that the application was not frivolous or vexatious and had a reasonable prospect of success if properly filed, but the procedural default led to the dismissal.

The central legal issue was whether the FWC had the authority to dismiss the application due to non-compliance with the Act's fee requirements. The Commissioner considered the provisions of section 395, which mandates that applications be accompanied by prescribed fees, and section 587, which allows the FWC to dismiss applications not made in accordance with the Act. The Commissioner concluded that the application was procedurally flawed due to the lack of the required fee and thus fell within the dismissal criteria of section 587(1)(a). The fairness of the dismissal was further assessed based on the repeated notifications to Cairns and the explicit warnings provided, indicating that the dismissal was both justified and procedurally sound.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.