CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union v Commonwealth Government (represented by and acting through the Department of Immigration and Citizenship)

[2011] FWA 5035

[2011] FWA 5035

FAIR WORK AUSTRALIA

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union
v
Commonwealth Government (represented by and acting through the Department of Immigration and Citizenship)
(B2011/3219)

COMMISSIONER DEEGAN CANBERRA, 1 AUGUST 2011

Proposed protected action ballot by employees of the Department of Immigration and Citizenship.

[1] This is an application for a protected action ballot of members of the CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU) employed by the Commonwealth Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC). The application is made pursuant to s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). The CPSU seeks to ballot employees of DIAC who are CPSU members and who would be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement.

[2] This application follows an earlier s.437 application filed by the CPSU on 20 June 2011 in respect of its agreement negotiations with DIAC. A protected action ballot order [PR510745] was issued on 23 June 2011. That order extended the notice period under s.443(5) of the Act, to a period of 5 days.

[3] This application was listed for hearing in Canberra on 1 August 2011. A witness statement 1 was filed for the CPSU by an industrial officer, Mr Richard Muffatti.

[4] At the hearing of the application the representative of DIAC advised the Tribunal that DIAC would not oppose the application subject to an extension of the notice period for the taking of industrial action.

[5] In considering this matter I must apply s.443 of the Act which provides as follows:

443 When FWA must make a protected action ballot order

(1) FWA must make a protected action ballot order in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement if:

(a) an application has been made under section 437; and

(b) FWA is satisfied that each applicant has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach an agreement with the employer of the employees who are to be balloted.

(2) FWA must not make a protected action ballot order in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement except in the circumstances referred to in subsection (1).

(3) A protected action ballot order must specify the following:

(a) the name of each applicant for the order;

(b) the group or groups of employees who are to be balloted;

(c) the date by which voting in the protected action ballot closes;

(d) the question or questions to be put to the employees who are to be balloted, including the nature of the proposed industrial action.

(4) If FWA decides that a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission is to be the protected action ballot agent for the protected action ballot, the protected action ballot order must also specify:

(a) the person that FWA decides, under subsection 444(1), is to be the protected action ballot agent; and

(b) the person (if any) that FWA decides, under subsection 444(3), is to be the independent advisor for the ballot.

(5) If FWA is satisfied, in relation to the proposed industrial action that is the subject of the protected action ballot, that there are exceptional circumstances justifying the period of written notice referred to in paragraph 414(2)(a) being longer than 3 working days, the protected action ballot order may specify a longer period of up to 7 working days.

Note: Under subsection 414(1), before a person engages in employee claim action for a proposed enterprise agreement, a bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by the agreement must give written notice of the action to the employer of the employee.

Application made in accordance with s.437

[6] I am satisfied for the purposes of s.443(1)(a) that the application has been made in accordance with s.437 of the Act.

Genuinely trying to reach agreement

[7] The only other prerequisite for the making of the order is that I must be satisfied that the applicant has been, and presently is, genuinely trying to reach an agreement with the employer of the employees who are to be balloted.

[8] In order to demonstrate that the CPSU has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach an agreement with DIAC the statement of Mr Muffatti attested to:

• The outcome of an All Staff EA vote initiated by DIAC which resulted in DIAC’s proposed agreement being voted down by a majority of 65 per cent;



• The meetings between the parties which had taken place since the formal resumption of negotiations on 6 July 2011;



• The outcome of the protected action ballot conducted pursuant to the order [PR510745] issued in relation to the first application as a result of which the protected action proposed in the ballot was not approved on the basis that less than 50 per cent of the employees balloted cast a valid vote.

DIAC’s application under s.443(5) to increase to the notice period

[9] At the hearing of the application DIAC made an application to extend the notice period required for any resulting industrial action from three to five working days. In considering whether or not to require a longer period of written notice prior to taking protected industrial action under a protected action ballot I must apply s.443(5) of the Act which provides as follows:

443 When FWA must make a protected action ballot order

...

(5) If FWA is satisfied, in relation to the proposed industrial action that is the subject of the protected action ballot, that there are exceptional circumstances justifying the period of written notice referred to in paragraph 414(2)(a) being longer than 3 working days, the protected action ballot order may specify a longer period of up to 7 working days.

[10] The DIAC representative made a comprehensive submission in support of the application for the extension of the time period for the giving of notice of industrial action. The DIAC application was not opposed by the CPSU.

[11] I am satisfied, for the purposes of s.443(5), that exceptional circumstances exist which justify the period required for written notice of industrial action being increased from 3 to 5 working days.

The Order

[12] As I am satisfied that s.443(1)(a) and (b) have been complied with, I am required to make the protected action ballot order as sought by the CPSU. The order, which issues separately, will specify that the period of notice required to be given before the taking of industrial action is five (5) working days.

COMMISSIONER

 1   Exhibit CPSU 1

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR512719>