CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions

Case

[2011] FWA 7169

19 OCTOBER 2011

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2011] FWA 7169


FAIR WORK AUSTRALIA

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union
v
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions
(B2011/3747)

COMMISSIONER DEEGAN

CANBERRA, 19 OCTOBER 2011

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions.

[1] This is an application, filed on 18 October 2011, for a protected action ballot of members of the CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union (Union) employed by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Employer). The application is made pursuant to s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).

[2] The matter was initially listed for hearing on Thursday, 20 October 2011 but, prior to the hearing, the Employer advised the Tribunal that it did not intend to oppose the application. The hearing was vacated and I have determined the matter on the basis of the documents filed.

[3] The Union seeks to ballot specified employees of the Employer who are members of the Union, for whom the Union is a bargaining agent, and who would be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement.

[4] The relevant section of the Act, section 443, provides as follows:

443 When FWA must make a protected action ballot order

    (1) FWA must make a protected action ballot order in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement if:

      (a) an application has been made under section 437; and

      (b) FWA is satisfied that each applicant has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach an agreement with the employer of the employees who are to be balloted.

    (2) FWA must not make a protected action ballot order in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement except in the circumstances referred to in subsection (1).

    (3) A protected action ballot order must specify the following:

      (a) the name of each applicant for the order;

      (b) the group or groups of employees who are to be balloted;

      (c) the date by which voting in the protected action ballot closes;

      (d) the question or questions to be put to the employees who are to be balloted, including the nature of the proposed industrial action.

    (4) If FWA decides that a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission is to be the protected action ballot agent for the protected action ballot, the protected action ballot order must also specify:

      (a) the person that FWA decides, under subsection 444(1), is to be the protected action ballot agent; and

      (b) the person (if any) that FWA decides, under subsection 444(3), is to be the independent advisor for the ballot.

    (5) If FWA is satisfied, in relation to the proposed industrial action that is the subject of the protected action ballot, that there are exceptional circumstances justifying the period of written notice referred to in paragraph 414(2)(a) being longer than 3 working days, the protected action ballot order may specify a longer period of up to 7 working days.

[5] I am satisfied that the application has been made in accordance with s.437 of the Act.

[6] In support of the application the Union filed a statement affirmed by Mr Glenn Blackmore, Union organiser, dated 18 October 2011. Mr Blackmore’s statement described the negotiations that have been occurring between the parties since February 2011 when the CPSU first approached the Employer setting out the first part of its claims for a proposed agreement.

[7] It was Mr Blackmore’s evidence that the Union has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Employer on the terms of a new agreement and that at all times during the negotiations the Union has given serious consideration to all proposals put forward by the Employer.

[8] For the purposes of s.443(1)(b) of the Act I am satisfied, on the basis of the unchallenged evidence brought by the Union, that the applicant has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach an agreement with the employer of the employees who are to be balloted.

[9] As s.443(1)(a) and (b) have been complied with I must make a protected action ballot order, as sought by the Union. My Order [PR515869] is issued separately.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR515870>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0