CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union-SPSF Group

Case [2018] FWC 3308


[2018] FWC 3308
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.768BB - Application for an order about coverage for employee organisations under a state instrument

CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union-SPSF Group
(AG2018/1944)

COMMISSIONER JOHNS

MELBOURNE, 7 JUNE 2018

S 768BB – Application for an order about coverage for employee organisations under a state instrument.

[1] On 11 May 2018, the Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU) made an application to the Fair Work Commission (Commission) pursuant to s.768BB of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

[2] s. 768BB of the FW Act provides as follows:

FWC orders about coverage for employee organisations

(1) The FWC may make an order that:

(a) a copied State instrument for a transferring employee that would, or would be likely to, cover an employee organisation (the first employee organisation) in relation to the transferring employee because of subsection 768AN(2) does not, or will not, cover the organisation; and

(b) another employee organisation (the second employee organisation ) is, or will be, covered by the copied State instrument in relation to the employee.

(2) When making an order under subsection (1), the FWC must consider whether the second employee organisation is a federal counterpart (within the meaning of section 9A of the Registered Organisations Act) of the first employee organisation.

(3) The regulations may:

(a) prescribe circumstances in which the FWC may make an order for the purposes of subsection (1); and

(b) otherwise make provision in relation to the making of the order.

(4) An order under subsection (1) must be made in accordance with any regulations that are made for the purposes of subsection (3).

[3] Regulation 6.03A of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 states as follows:

FWA orders about coverage for employee organisations

For paragraph 768BB(3)(a) of the Act, a circumstance in which FWA may make an order mentioned in subsection 768BB(1) of the Act is that the order is to be made:

(a) on FWA's own initiative; or

(b) on application to FWA by a transferring employee, or a person who is likely to be a transferring employee; or

(c) on application to FWA by the new employer, or a person who is likely to be the new employer; or

(d) on application to FWA by an employee organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of an employee mentioned in paragraph (b).

[4] In 2013 the NSW Government passed the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NSW Enabling) Act 2013 (NSW), allowing the Minister to transfer the employment of disability services employees to either employment of another public sector agency or a non-government sector employer. Around 100 Employees were transferred from the Department of Family and Community Services (FACS) to LWB Disability Services Central Limited and LWB Disability Services South Limited (Life Without Barriers) on or around 6 September 2017.

[5] Pursuant to Part 6-3A, Division 3 of the Act, upon this transfer, a number of state awards and agreements became copied state awards and copied state instruments.

[6] The relevant copied state instruments are as follows:

a) Crown Employees (Public Service Conditions of Employment) Reviewed Award 2009

b) Crown Employees (Administrative and Clerical Officers - Salaries) Award 2007

c) Crown Employees (Public Sector - Salaries 2017) Award

d) Crown Employees Ageing, Disability And Home Care – NSW Department of Family and Community Services (Community Living Award) 2015

[7] The purpose of the application is that the Commission makes an Order that the CPSU is covered by the copied State instruments mentioned in [6].

[8] The application was brought before the Commission because the Public Service Association and Professional Officers’ Association Amalgamated Union of New South Wales (PSA NSW) is the state registered employee organisation covered by the state instruments and it is not a registered organisation for the purposes of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009. The CPSU is the federal counterpart for the PSA NSW, pursuant to Schedule 1A to the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Regulations 2009.

[9] On 14 May 2018, the Commission sought the position of Life Without Barriers in relation to the application.

[10] On 25 May 2018, Life Without Barriers stated it did not oppose the application or object to the orders sought.

[11] Due to a typographical error in the initial application, the CPSU lodged an amended application correcting the error. Life Without Barriers subsequently consented to the amended application.

[12] I am satisfied that the CPSU is eligible to represent employees in Life Without Barriers in accordance with its rules.

[13] I consider that the provisions of ss.768BB (1), (2) and (3) of the Act are satisfied and in particular that in accordance with s.768BB (3), regulation 6.03A of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is satisfied. Therefore I consider that I may make the order sought.

[14] In the circumstances that the employees of FACS have been transferred to Life Without Barriers, the CPSU is eligible to represent these employees and Life Without Barriers does not oppose the application, I consider that I should grant the order sought.

[15] Accordingly I will grant the order sought by the CPSU.

[16] An order will be issued with this decision.


COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR607874>

Details
AGLC
CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union-SPSF Group [2018] FWC 3308
Case
[2018] FWC 3308
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU) filed an application seeking coverage under the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically section 768BB, for a group of employees. The State Public Sector Federation (SPSF) contested this application, leading to a review by the Fair Work Commission. The crux of the dispute was whether the CPSU was entitled to represent the employees in question under the provisions of the Act.

The legal issues at the heart of this case revolved around the interpretation and application of section 768BB of the Fair Work Act. This section deals with the recognition of employee organisations for bargaining purposes in the state public sector. The Commission had to determine if the CPSU met the necessary criteria to be recognised as a representative organisation for the employees, and whether there was sufficient support among the employees for the CPSU to be granted coverage.

The Fair Work Commission, after examining the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, concluded that the CPSU did not meet the criteria set out in section 768BB for coverage. The Commission found that the CPSU had not demonstrated sufficient employee support and did not satisfy the conditions required for recognition. Therefore, the application for coverage was dismissed. The Commission emphasised the importance of clear evidence of employee support and the procedural requirements that must be met for an organisation to be recognised under the Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.