| [2016] FWCA 6068 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
CPB Contractors Pty Ltd and Ors
(AG2016/4327)
WESTCONNEX NEW M5 / AWU TUNNELLING WORKS GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2016-2020
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 29 AUGUST 2016 |
Application for approval of the WestConnex New M5 / AWU Tunnelling Works Greenfields Agreement 2016-2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the WestConnex New M5 / AWU Tunnelling Works Greenfields Agreement 2016-2020 (Agreement). The application was made by CPB Contractors Pty Ltd; Dragados Australia Pty Ltd and Samsung C&T Corporation pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).
[2] This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of section 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that The Australian Workers’ Union are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[3] Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with The Australian Workers’ Union and that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 5 September 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 28 August 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE420777 PR584701>
- AGLC
- CPB Contractors Pty Ltd and Ors [2016] FWCA 6068
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 6068
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the agreement was made in good faith, whether it provided for a fair and efficient system for resolving disputes, and if it complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the court considered whether the agreement adequately addressed the needs of the employees and the business and if it was free from any improper influence or coercion. The fairness and appropriateness of the agreement's provisions regarding wages, working conditions, and other employment terms were also scrutinised.
The court found that the agreement was made in good faith and provided for a fair and efficient system for resolving disputes. The provisions of the agreement were deemed fair and reasonable, taking into account the interests of both the employees and the employers. The court concluded that the agreement complied with all relevant statutory requirements and was therefore appropriate for approval. The agreement was approved, allowing it to come into effect and govern the employment terms for the specified period.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.