CPB Contractors Pty Ltd

[2017] FWCA 4665

[2017] FWCA 4665

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

CPB Contractors Pty Ltd

(AG2017/3781)

THIESS PTY LTD WHEATSTONE PROJECT AGREEMENT 2012

Building, metal and civil construction industries
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS	PERTH, 4 OCTOBER 2017

Application for termination of the Thiess Wheatstone Project Agreement 2012.

1. This decision concerns an application made by CPB Contractors Pty Ltd (the Applicant) for the termination of the Thiess Wheatstone Project Agreement 2012 (the Agreement).

1. This application is made under section 225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

1. This section of the Act allows an employer to apply to the Commission for the termination of an agreement that has passed its nominal expiry date.

1. Section 226 of the Act, set out below, details the considerations for the Commission when dealing with such an application.

“226      When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

(a)       the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

(b)       the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

(i)        the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

(ii)       the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”

1. The Applicant has provided in support of its application a statutory declaration from Ms Jessica Corica (Ms Corica) who is the HR Manager of the Applicant.

1. Ms Corica explains that the Agreement had a nominal expiry date of 29 August 2016 and that no employee is covered by the Agreement following the demobilisation of employees from the project in December 2016. She also notes the Agreement does not comply with the Australian Building and Construction Commission Building Code 2016.

1. The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) was invited to provide its view on the application but did not seek to make a submission.

1. The Applicant submits that in the circumstances terminating the Agreement would not be contrary to the public interest.

Consideration

1. I am satisfied that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest.

1. Taking into account the views of the employer and accepting the Applicant’s statement that there are no employees covered by the Agreement, which has not been challenged by the AWU, I do consider in the circumstances here that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.

1. Accordingly, the Thiess Wheatstone Project Agreement 2012 is terminated and pursuant to section 227 of the Act, the termination is to take effect on and from the date of this decision.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AE896512  PR595919>