Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cox v Newcastle City Council [2020] NSWLEC 1081 Hearing dates: 22-23 January 2020 Date of orders: 26 February 2020 Decision date: 26 February 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: The orders of the Court are:
(1) The appeal is dismissed;
(2) Modification application DA 2015/0298.02 for construction of external additions to the ground floor porch and addition of two Velux roof windows at 65 Frederick Street, Merewether (Lot 200 DP 88297065) is refused.
(3) The exhibits are returned with the exception of Exhibits 1 and 3.Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION – Heritage Item – whether the works have a detrimental impact on the significance of the heritage item – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Newcastle Local Environmental Plan 2012
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005Cases Cited: Jonah Pty Limited v Pittwater Council (2006) 144 LGERA 408; [2006] NSWLEC 99 Texts Cited: Newcastle Development Control Plan 2012 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jason Cox (Applicant)
Newcastle City Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
J Cox (Litigant in person) (Applicant)
A Pickles SC (Respondent)
Newcastle City Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2019/133476 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: The Applicant seeks consent for alterations and additions to the existing building at 65 Frederick Street, Merewether. Approval is sought via a modification application pursuant to s 4.55(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act). The alterations consist of the construction of external additions to the ground floor verandah comprising:
Construction of a masonry surfboard store to the southern end of the verandah;
An enveloping timber screen north of the surfboard store;
A ‘hit and miss’ brick screen to the north of the entry door that extends to the living room doors; and
A timber screen on the northern edge of the verandah to the driveway
(Statement of Environmental Effects, Class 1 Application, filed 30 April 2019)
-
The application was refused by Council and the Applicant appeals that refusal pursuant to s 8.9 of the EPA Act.
-
The appeal was subject to mandatory conciliation on 22 January 2020 (s 34AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act)), however agreement was not reached and conciliation was terminated. The proceedings were dealt with as a hearing. The parties consented to the admission of evidence given during the conciliation conference in the hearing (s 34AA(2)(b)(ii) LEC Act).
-
Council maintains that the development warrants refusal on the following grounds:
That the proposed alterations and additions have an unreasonable detrimental impact on the subject building, which is listed as a heritage item in the Newcastle Local Environmental Plan 2012 (LEP 2012);
With respect to the proposed installation of two Velux roof windows, the application does not provide sufficient information for Council to adequately assess their suitability.
Site and locality
-
The subject property is known as 65 Frederick Street, Merewether (Lot 200 DP 88297065). It contains a single dwelling which is listed as a local…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Cox v Newcastle City Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2020] NSWLEC 1081
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
The orders of the Court are:
(1) The appeal is dismissed;
(2) Modification application DA 2015/0298.02 for construction of external additions to the ground floor porch and addition of two Velux roof windows at 65 Frederick Street, Merewether (Lot 200 DP 88297065) is refused.
(3) The exhibits are returned with the exception of Exhibits 1 and 3.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.