Administrative Appeals Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2008] AATA 368
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No N2005/1341
VETERANS’ APPEALS DIVISION ) Re DIANE VIOLET COX Applicant
And
REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Ms Robin Hunt, Senior Member
Dr Maxwell Thorpe, MemberDate6 May 2008
PlaceSydney
Decision The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review and substitutes a decision that the late Mr Cox's death was war-caused and defence-caused. The matter is remitted to the respondent to assess the rate of war widows’ pension applicable to the applicant.
...................[Sgd]....................
Ms Robin Hunt
Senior Member
CATCHWORDS
Veterans’ Affairs – claim by widow – veteran performed operational service and eligible service – death by suicide – claim that suicide attributable to service – meaning of attributable to service – exposure to asbestos – reading of article triggering depression – adjustment disorder caused by fear of contracting asbestosis – disorder led to suicide – causation attributable to service – decision set aside.
Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 ss 6-6F, 7, 8(1)(b),13(1), 14, 120(4), 196B(14)
Statement of Principles concerning suicide or attempted suicide No. 71 of 1996, as amended by Instrument No. 177 of 1996
Statement of Principles concerning suicide or attempted suicide No. 72 of 1996, as amended by Instrument No. 178 of 1996
Statement of Principles concerning adjustment disorder No. 57 of 1996Statement of Principles concerning adjustment disorder No. 58 of 1996
Benjamin v Repatriation Commission (2001) 70 ALD 622
Crane and Repatriation Commission [2003] AATA 447
McKenna v Repatriation Commission (1999) 86 FCR 144
PMT Partners Pty Limited v Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service (1995) 184 CLR 301
Repatriation Commission v Bendy (1989) 18 ALD 144
Repatriation Commission v Hawkins (1993) 45 FCR 205
Repatriation Commission v Law (1980) 31 ALR 140
REASONS FOR DECISION
6 May 2008 Ms Robin Hunt, Senior Member
Dr Maxwell Thorpe, Membersummary
1. Mrs Diane Violet Cox is the widow of the deceased veteran, Mr Leslie Cox. Mr Cox was exposed to asbestos dust during periods of operational service and defence service which he performed in the Royal Australian Navy. Mrs Cox believes her late husband’s suicide was attributable to his fear of contracting an asbestos related disease due to his exposure to asbestos during service periods. Mr Cox, who already had a lung disease, committed suicide after reading an article about the fate of other servicemen who had died of asbestos related diseases. Mrs Cox is seeking the widow’s pension. We have found that the late Mr Cox’s death was both war-caused and defence-caused, following a chain of events starting with his exposure to asbestos dust during service, his lung disease, the reading of the article and his developing depression which led to his suicide. The date of effect of our decision is 3 December 2004.
issue
2. The issue for the Tribunal is whether the veteran’s “kind of death”, which was death by suicide, was related to his service in such manner that it was war-caused and/or defence-caused. The only…
Continue reading Cox and Repatriation Commission
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Cox and Repatriation Commission [2008] AATA 368
- Case
- [2008] AATA 368
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to decide whether Mr Cox's suicide could be attributed to his service, specifically considering the chain of causation linking his exposure to asbestos during service to his eventual suicide. The widow argued that Mr Cox's adjustment disorder, triggered by the fear of contracting asbestosis, directly led to his suicide, making it attributable to his service. The court examined relevant legislative provisions, including sections 6-6F, 7, 8(1)(b), 13(1), 14, 120(4), and 196B(14) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, and referred to statutory instruments and precedent cases such as Benjamin v Repatriation Commission, Crane and Repatriation Commission, and McKenna v Repatriation Commission.
The Federal Court found that Mr Cox's adjustment disorder, which arose from his exposure to asbestos during service, directly contributed to his suicide. The court acknowledged the clear chain of causation from the service-related exposure to asbestos, through the development of the adjustment disorder, to the eventual suicide. Based on this, the court ruled that Mr Cox's death was war-caused and defence-caused, thereby qualifying the widow for a war widows' pension. The decision of the Repatriation Commission was set aside, and the matter was remitted for reassessment of the applicable pension rate.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review and substitutes a decision that the late Mr Cox's death was war-caused and defence-caused. The matter is remitted to the respondent to assess the rate of war widows’ pension applicable to the applicant.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.