Couper v Valuer-General

Case [2013] QLC 49


LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION: Couper & Anor v Valuer-General [2013] QLC 49
PARTIES:

Dennis John Couper and Anita Claire Couper
(appellants)

v.

Valuer-General
(respondent)
FILE NOs: LVA703-11
LVA893-12
DIVISION: Land Court of Queensland
PROCEEDING: Appeals against valuations under the Land Valuation Act 2010
DELIVERED ON: 31 July 2013
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane

HEARD ON:

HEARD AT:

19 March 2013

Gympie

MEMBER: Mr PA Smith
ORDERS:

1.     The appeal in LVA703-11 is dismissed.

2.     The appeal in LVA893-12 is dismissed.

CATCHWORDS:

Practice and Procedure – onus of proof

Valuation – valuation methodology – use of relevant sales best evidence – relativity of valuations of other blocks only relevant if those valuations are shown to be correct – “top down” or “bottom up” valuation approach  – assessment of disabilities

Land Valuation Act 2010

Fairfax v Department of Natural Resources and Mines [2005] QLC 11
Donald Neil Meiers and Florence Myrtle Meiers v Valuer General [2012] QLC 0019
Spencer v The Commonwealth (1907) 5 CLR 418
Steers v Valuer-General [2012] QLC 12
Tow v The Valuer-General (1978) 5 QLCR 378

APPEARANCES:

Mrs Anita Couper for herself and her husband
Mrs Thea Johnson, Senior Lawyer for the Department of Natural Resources and Mines

Background

  1. This decision relates to two appeals by Mr and Mrs Couper (the appellants) against valuations by the respondent, the Valuer-General, pursuant to the Land Valuation Act2010, (the LVA), which valued the appellants’ property situated at 49 Collard Road, Mooloo via Gympie (the subject land), in the sum of $400,000 as at 1 October 2010 and 1 October 2011. The appellants contend for valuations of $150,000 and $200,000 respectively. It should be noted that the valuations of $400,000 arise as a consequence of a decision on objection relating to the 2011 valuation on 10 October 2012.

  2. The subject land has been valued and zoned as rural. The land is valued as unimproved land pursuant to the provisions of the LVA, which separates land valued as site value land and land valued as unimproved land.

The Subject Land

  1. The subject land is described as Lot 35 on LX 304, Parish of Amamoor, County of Lennox. It is located in Mooloo, approximately 16.5 kilometres south-west of Gympie.

  2. Access to the subject land is via Collard Road, which is a formed gravel rural road approximately 600 metres in length, then via various bitumen roads to Gympie. Access is subject to creek flooding during rain events which can make the access impassable.

  3. The subject land is severed on the western side by Miles Road, which has a gravel surface.

  4. Telephone, electricity, mail and refuse collection services are available to the subject land. Good amenities are available at Gympie which is the district’s urban centre.

  5. The subject land has an area of 73.769 hectares. It is of an irregular topography, ranging from creek flat fronting Pie Creek, to easy, then moderate and steep sloping country with ridge spurs. The property is mostly cleared and is used for grazing cattle. A residence is also located…

Continue reading Couper v Valuer-General

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Couper v Valuer-General [2013] QLC 49
Case
[2013] QLC 49
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Couper v Valuer-General involved the appellant, Mr. Couper, who challenged the valuation of his property by the Valuer-General for the purposes of rating. The dispute centred on the methodology employed by the Valuer-General in determining the value of Mr. Couper's property, specifically regarding the use of comparable sales and the approach taken in assessing the value. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

The central legal issue in this case was whether the Valuer-General's valuation of Mr. Couper's property was legally sound, particularly concerning the use of comparable sales and the approach taken in the valuation process. The court had to determine whether the Valuer-General correctly applied the relevant valuation methodology and whether the use of comparable sales was appropriate and correctly applied. The court also needed to assess whether the Valuer-General had appropriately considered any disabilities affecting the property.

The court found that the Valuer-General had correctly applied the valuation methodology, ensuring that the comparable sales used were relevant and correctly applied. The court held that the Valuer-General's approach to valuation was sound and that the use of comparable sales was appropriate. The court also determined that the Valuer-General had correctly assessed any disabilities affecting the property. Consequently, the court dismissed both appeals brought by Mr. Couper.

In light of the court's findings, the appeals brought by Mr. Couper were dismissed. The court confirmed the valuations determined by the Valuer-General, upholding the assessment of the property's value for rating purposes.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The appeal in LVA703-11 is dismissed.

2. The appeal in LVA893-12 is dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.