Council of the Law Society of the Act v Wearne (Occupational Discipline)

Case

[2015] ACAT 27

26 August 2014


ACT CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL



COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE ACT v WEARNE (Occupational Discipline) [2015] ACAT 27

OR 14/30

Catchwords:              OCCUPATIONAL DISCIPLINE – LEGAL PRACTITIONERS – unsatisfactory professional conduct - consent orders – purporting to witness statutory declaration when not done so

Legislation cited:      Legal Profession (Solicitors) Rules 2007

List of

Texts/Papers cited:    Legal Aid Commissioner (ACT) Enterprise Agreement 2011-2013

Tribunal:                   Mr G. Lunney SC – Senior Member

Date of Orders:           26 August 2014  

Date of Publication of orders:                     31 March 2015

ACT CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL       )          NO:     OR 14/30

RE:COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE ACT

Applicant

AND:NECIA WEARNE

Respondent

ORDERS

Tribunal:                   Mr G Lunney SC – Senior Member

Date of Order:          26 August 2014

By consent, the Tribunal orders that:

  1. A finding that the respondent has been guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct.

  2. An order publicly reprimanding the respondent.

  3. An order that the respondent pay the applicant’s costs on the Supreme Court scale on a party/party basis as agreed or as assessed.

Particulars:

(i)The respondent, in breach of Rule 1.2 of the Legal Profession (Solicitors) Rules 2007, failed to act with competence and diligence in the service of her client, by recklessly apply her signature in the place for a prescribed person to witness a statutory declaration, in circumstances where her client had not sighted, approved or signed the declaration as more particularly detailed in paragraphs 2 to 4 in the Agreed Statement of Facts, and by so doing engaged in conduct that fell short of the standard of competence and diligence that a member of the public is entitled to expect of a reasonably competent Australian Legal Practitioner.

Agreed statement of Facts:

  1. The Respondent was at all material times, including on 30 July 2013, a local legal practitioner employed by the Legal Aid Commission (Commission) and the holder of a restricted practising certificate.

  1. On or about 30 July 2013, the Respondent at about 5:00 pm on the afternoon immediately before she was to embark upon nine (9) weeks recreation leave, applied her signature to a Form 1410 Statutory Declaration in preparation for lodgement with    the Department of Immigration and Citizenship (Department) on behalf of a client, [name redacted] which form was completed in accordance with instructions provided by the client at an earlier conference.

  1. The Client had not sighted, approved nor signed the declaration and was not present when it was signed by the Respondent.

  1. The Respondent provided oral and handwritten instructions to an administrative officer to progress the matter. The Form 1410 was provided by an unknown employee of the Commission to the Client who, between 30 July 2013 and 6 August            2013, signed and returned it to the Commission, although the form was not further actioned and, in particular, was not submitted to the Department.

  1. The Commission appointed Clayton Utz to investigate the matter and provide a report which found on the balance of probabilities the Respondent was guilty of misconduct as defined by the Legal Aid Commissioner (ACT) Enterprise Agreement 2011-2013.

  1. On 17 December 2013, the Respondent resigned her employment at the Commission with effect from 29 January 2014.

  1. The matter was referred to the Society by the Commission on 28 January 2014.

    Signed ........................................

    Mr G Lunney SC

    Senior Member

HEARING DETAILS

FILE NUMBER:

OR 14/30

PARTIES, APPLICANT:

Council of the Law Society of the ACT

PARTIES, RESPONDENT:

Necia Wearne

COUNSEL APPEARING, APPLICANT

COUNSEL APPEARING, RESPONDENT

Ms T Warwick

SOLICITORS FOR APPLICANT

Phelps Reid Lawyers

TRIBUNAL MEMBERS:

Mr G. Lunney SC – Senior Member

DATES OF HEARING:

26 August 2014

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

1